12 Angry Men Analysis

824 Words4 Pages
12 Angry Men Daily there are thousands of people being found guilty for a crime they did not commit because of a prejudiced judge.Sidney Lumet and Reginald Rose the writers and directors of 12 Angry Men wrote and produced a play about 12 jurors that briefly discuss a trial and come to a verdict , personal issues develop which causes conflict and only makes the process more grueling. The accused boy is being found guilty for murdering his father, 12 jurors are put in a hot room in New York and spend hours briefly viewing the scenario. Although one might think that the justice system should be left in the hands of citizens ,the director and writer of 12 Angry Men , Sidney Lumet and Reginald Rose demonstrate that the United States justice system is unfair and is simply corrupt , inefficient , and injustice due to the jurors biases minds, ignorant attitude ,and the lack of time and energy put in the trial while trying to decide a verdict.
Lumet and Rose the director and writer of 12 Angry Men reveal that the justice system simply unfair,corrupt, inefficient, and injustice, as they show the justice system simply being unfair,corrupt, inefficient, and injustice ;when they demonstrate the prejudice , ignorant attitude , and lack of time put in deciding a verdict . Juror #7 choice to act short tempered , impatient , and ignorant conveys that he is callous towards the trial when he states ,” This better be fast I got tickets to-Hamilton- for tonight. I must be the only

More about 12 Angry Men Analysis

Get Access