To members of the board this is a letter to inform you that we gave Dr. Mishap a 4 months’ notice that we are not going to renew his contract, because we have decided to take his department in a new direction. In retaliation Dr. Mishap has informed us of his intention to sue for injury and damages. These are the three options that we would like for the board to consider and give your feedback on which course of action you would like to take.
Arbitration
This option deals with resolving disputes outside of the courtroom. They take their disputes to an arbitrator who looks over the evidence, listens to each parties’ side of the story and makes a decision. Process is not as formal as when attending a courtroom or trial and is less expensive, but more invasive than mediation or negotiation.
Advantages
- Avoids hostility- Both parties are encouraged to work together by participating fully and come up with a resolution without escalating anger and hostility toward each other as in litigation. Attorneys are hire to help through arbitration if the dispute involves $10,000 or less, most individuals choose to take this process on alone with just receiving guidance from the arbitrator.
- Usually cheaper than litigation- More lawyers are getting involved in arbitration cases and are charging $3,000 -$4,000 per day for their services.
- Faster than litigation- According the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services it takes approximately 475 days from filing to decision in an
Arbitration is the submission of a disputed matter to an impartial person (the arbitrator) for decision. Arbitration is typically an out-of-court method for resolving a dispute. The arbitrator controls the process, will listen to both sides and make a decision. Like a trial, only one side will prevail. Unlike a trial, appeal rights are limited.
What is the relationship between the costs of arbitration and the likelihood of parties negotiating their own settlement?
It is promoted as an avenue to resolve disputes efficiently. Arbitration avoids hostility. Parties in arbitration are more likely than not to work peacefully rather than inflate malice against each other. It is a much cheaper option to litigation, especially when the arbitrator chosen is a non-lawyer. It is conducted in a much quicker process, saving much time and stress on both parties in the long run. Scheduling for arbitration is flexible, and can be decided on by the parties rather than fitting in a schedule convenient for the courts. Rules of evidence and procedure are much more simple and lenient. Most importantly, arbitration is handled privately, with no information being released to the public unlike court
Alternative dispute resolution is a highly effective instrument in resolving conflict and attaining justice for individuals in relation to resource efficiency and timeliness through utilising mediation, conciliation and arbitration. Mediation is an exceptionally efficacious informal process of dispute resolution, usually confidential and conducted with the assistance of an
Although the arbitrator’s final awards are legally binding, an unhappy party of arbitration may still go to court under certain circumstances. As mentioned by Fallon & McConnell, “unless one party protests that there was a gross injustice, collusion, or fraud, arbitration that is specified by a contract can be converted into a legal judgment. This requires a petition to the appropriate court” (n.d., p. 388). As expected, this can become costly for the person who is seeking to appeal.
Lorena files a suit against Milton. Before going to trial, the parties, with their attorneys, meet to try to resolve their dispute. A third party suggests or proposes a resolution, which the parties may or may not decide to adopt. This is
“Grievance mediation is an alternative dispute resolution procedure which promises many of the advantages of arbitration in less time and at lower expense” (Roberts, Wolters, Holley, & Field, 1990). Mediation is less time consuming and the least expensive method of resolving a complaint than going forward with the arbitration process. If chosen by the complainant, grievance mediation is a completely voluntary step. This is the step prior to going forward to the arbitration process. The mediation step provides an opportunity for a
Mediation happens when a 3rd party comes in and helps improve the relationship, enhances communication, and uses effective problem solving techniques. Administrative or managerial approaches and procedures are used if conflict is between employees or members of an organization. The 3rd party, doing the mediation is allowed to make a decision if need be. This approach reminds me of how the military handles conflict within their ranks. Being in the military I have seen this process being conducted, they will allow the parties to try to resolve their own conflict, but if they cannot the authority figure does it for them. Arbitration is a private process still including a 3rd party that helps resolve the conflict. Arbitration comes in two forms med-arb and mediation then arbitration. Med-arb uses mediation as the first step to resolve the conflict, if mediation does not work they move on to arbitration, while the mediation then arbitration uses both with a different 3rd party for
Mediation happens when a 3rd party comes in and helps improve the relationship, enhances communication, and uses effective problem solving techniques. Administrative or managerial approaches and procedures used if conflict is between employees or members of an organization. The 3rd party, who does is allowed to make a decision is doing the mediation and is allowed to make a decision if need be. This approach reminds me of how the military handles conflict within their ranks. Being in the military I have seen this process conducted, they will allow the parties to try to resolve their own conflict, but if they cannot the authority figure does it for them. Arbitration is a private process still including a 3rd party that helps resolve the conflict. Arbitration comes in two forms med-arb and mediation then arbitration. Med-arb uses mediation as the first step to resolve the conflict, if mediation does not work they move on to arbitration, while the mediation then arbitration uses both with a different 3rd party for
Mediation involves a third party mediator to resolve the dispute. The third party mediator is unbiased and uninterested. This individual usually is a trained professional in mediation and is aware of legal principles that may affect the case. Arbitration is a form of ADR that utilizes a third party decision maker to resolve a dispute; this individual is considered an arbitrator. Advantages of arbitration are the use of decision makers that have expertise in the subject matter. This can help prevent ill decisions by the use of a jury and ensure that the case is being reviewed by a knowledgeable professional. Another advantage of using arbitration is that the resolution both parties lose control of the resolution process. This portrays an act of fairness that can be lost in litigation. In addition, the low costs and privacy involved with using an arbitrator to settle a dispute will save both parties money and prevent the public from seeking information on the topic; thus potentially avoiding negative reception from the public once the settle is complete. The end goal of the parties involved in an alternative dispute resolution is that a settlement is agreed upon. A Settlement involves two parties in a legal dispute that work out their differences and enter into an agreement to resolve the situation. Depending on the circumstances, an agreement could involve monetary reward or simply an
I learned a few things from the ARD web site. First, I learned that there are state and federal laws that support mediation and arbitration when it is needed, but negotiation almost always come first (Cornell University Law School, n.d.). I also learned that an arbitration panel is a process in which each side chooses and arbitrator and then the chosen arbitrators chose a third arbitrator to make up the panel (Cornell University Law School, n.d.). I believe having a better understanding how the process works will help me to establish the next steps beyond basic conflict resolution if needed. Darr (1994) discusses the effectiveness of ADR and that is can help maintain privacy better than civil litigation, lower cost and speedier results than litigation. Morreim (2015) discusses how and ethics mediator can positively affect the outcomes of conflict situations, especially in the hospital
1. The judge should let the arbitration proceed as Mr Groetsch has the right to pursue any action that he believes is necessary to advance his claim. Class action suits normally take longer to prosecute because attorneys want to find and represent as many claimants as possible. Attorneys handling the litigation receive a substantial fee from the compensation settlement whereas the cost of arbitration is minimal. Litigation also requires court fees as well as attorney costs while arbitration may only require the cost of a personal attorney and the fee for the arbitrator. Class action lawsuits are argued in a court of law and may require an extensive amount of
Beyond negotiation and mediation, there are a number of approaches that decrease the personal control the people involved have over the dispute outcome, increase the involvement of external decision makers, and rely increasingly on win-lose and either-or decision-making techniques. These approaches can be divided into public and private, and legal and extralegal.
Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants;
Arbitration is legal technique used to resolve any disputes outside of the courts. Arbitration allows for speedy and cheap resolution of any disputes, the parties involved in a dispute agree to appoint a third person (arbitrator) who will hear their testimonies, and look into the evidence they provide. The arbitrator's decision cannot be challenged in a law court as it is considered final and the parties involved have to accept the decision (Brams & Merrill, 1986). There are only very limited circumstances where the decision of an arbitrator can be challenged, and this is mostly if there can be proof from one of the parties showing that the arbitrator was biased in their decision or ruling. The chosen arbitrator will be an experienced person in the area of the dispute.