preview

Abstraction In Today's Society

Better Essays

“We must not see any person as an abstraction. Instead we must see in every person a universe with its own secrets, with its own treasures, with its own sources of anguish, and with some measure of triumph.” Elie Wiesel’s words ring true today more than ever. Often times, people are regarded as abstractions due to simplicity, especially in today’s contemporary media: for most people imagining one’s self in the living conditions of a starving child in a developing country may prove emotionally painful; victims of a natural disaster or terrorist attack are pitied, but fail to receive one’s action; and empathy for a person miles away who has lost a loved one it may may be an inconvenience. In today’s society, change proves infeasible if people …show more content…

Henrietta died shortly after giving birth to her fifth child, Joe. Her death left her husband, Day a widower; as a result, he would be solely responsible for the children. However, “because Day was working two jobs, Lawrence dropped out of school and spent most of his time taking care of his brothers and Deborah”(Skloot 110). Due to Day’s two jobs, Lawrence, their oldest son dropped out of school and raised three of his siblings--Sonny, Deborah, and Joe. Even though Henrietta’s cells went on to make millions of dollars, Day and Henrietta’s family received no monetary compensation for her contribution to the medical field. Unfortunately, Henrietta’s cousin Ethel stepped in to take care of the children when Lawrence departed for the military. Ethel starved the children, beat them, and her husband Galen physically abused Deborah for the remainder of her childhood. Because Day could not care for the children, due to him working two jobs, he unwillingly exposed his children to a poor childhood which continued to affect them later in life. Both Joe, who changed his name to Zakariyya, and Sonny, ended up in jail for various crimes because family influences lead them down the wrong path in life. Doing nothing caused this pattern to continue in the family, “And it looked like Deborah’s son Alfred was taking the same path as his …show more content…

At one point, an alleged lawyer by the name of Sir Lord Keenan Kester Cofield contacted the Lacks family. He mentioned he could help them sue Hopkins for monetary reimbursement for using Henrietta’s cells without any patient consent; however, did not catch on to his tainted motives, “In various court documents, judges described Cofield as a “con-artist”. . . By the time Cofield contacted the Lackses about suing Hopkins, he’d already been banned from filing lawsuits in at least two countries”(Skloot 227). Cofield, an expert con-artist, found it easy to appear as a lawyer and to convince them he was helping because the Lacks family was poverty-stricken. Henrietta’s family continued to be dehumanized, when they were seen as a profitable scam for Cofield rather than individuals who had lives outside of the HeLa cells. Due to a lack of punishment or media knowledge about this instance, the same thing that happened to Henrietta continued. For example, scientists unknowingly sampled a worker named John Moore, of his rare cells and his physician developed and patented them. Upon learning this, Moore told reporters, “‘It was very dehumanizing to be thought of as Mo, to be referred to as Mo in the medical records. All of a sudden, I was not the person Golde was putting his arm around, I was Mo, the cell line, like a piece of meat”(Skloot 201). Moore points out the malpractice in his situation,

Get Access