preview

Abuse Of Power In Animal Farm

Decent Essays

In the novella Animal Farm, George Orwell has skilfully allegorised the Russian Revolution and particularly the Communist dictator Joseph Stalin. The novella effectively satirises totalitarianism regimes and political corruption to convey the abuse of power. Orwell effectively uses character representations to show the abuse of power. The three characters that are satirised are Napoleon the corrupt leader, Squealer the propagandist and Boxer, the acquiescent worker. Orwell exaggerates Boxers loyalty and lack of intelligence to satirise the ways he enables other animals to abuse their power. Boxer is described as having a “stupid appearance” (2) and being “not of first-rate intelligence” (2), this is emphasised through his naivety in situations …show more content…

Squealers manipulative propagandist personality is foregrounded in the text to satirise the pigs’ abuse of power. When the “strange incident” (114), occurs and the commandment “No animal shall drink alcohol”(114) is ironically changed to “No animal shall drink alcohol to excess”(114). Squealer is covering for Napoleon and abusing his power as he is changing the commandments to suit himself and the other pigs. When the wording is changed and the word “excess” (114) is added the meaning is changed and Orwell does this to represent Squealers manipulative side and show how he can easily ridicule the other animals’. Orwell uses dramatic irony to highlight Squealer’s deception and persuasiveness. For example, the phrase “we pigs are brainworkers” (37) and “it is for your sake that we drink [this] milk and eat [these] apples”(37). These phrases are dramatically ironic as pigs aren’t “brainworkers”(37) and it is very deceptive and dishonest of Squealer to speak such an absurd lie to the animals that are supposed to be his friends. Also, Orwell uses the words “he [can] turn black into white”(16), which is a metaphor for how Squealer has power or magic in his words to persuade and change someone’s mind from “black to white”(16). Readers are positioned to dislike Squealer’s character because of his manipulative and deceptive traits, which allow him to take advantage of the other …show more content…

Orwell exaggerates Napoleon as a dictator to effectively satirise the abuse of power. Orwell uses diction such as “Father of all Animals, Terror of Mankind, Protector of the Sheepfold [and] Ducklings Friend” (67) in order to exaggerate and make fun of Napoleons power and power abusive dictators in general. Other words that Orwell uses to connote this idea are “Napoleon demanded”(62) and “our leader, comrade Napoleon”(68) all words from the text that have been purposely satirised to indicate Napoleons ‘superiority’ and power over all of the animals. When the animals ordered by Napoleon to “assemble in the yard” (87) they are gathered to see Napoleon enter with his entourage of “nine huge dogs frisking around him”(87). The dogs being his protectors and bodyguards is highly exaggerated, this signifies Napoleon as being insecure as he feels the need to be protected by these dogs around his ‘comrades’. The point of the gathering is clear as Napoleon “emerges”(87) wearing the medals he has ironically awarded himself with “’Animal Hero, First Class’ and ‘Animal Hero, Second Class’” (87). Orwell adds this to the text to help the readers understand what type of self-centred person Napoleon is and how he abuses his power in this case to make himself seem more

Get Access