Accounting Scandals And Enron Accounting Scandal

In 1987, the misappropriation of money by two traders of Enron Oil brought to light the Valhalla scandal. These traders created offshore accounts and phony books, thus betting on the price of oil for Enron on both sides. Despite the executive board’s attempt to bring this case to Lay’s attention, no action was taken against these traders. On the contrary, they were encouraged to keep making money. The traders bet all of Enron’s money

In 2001, Enron, the largest energy company in the U.S., collapsed after a vast creative-accounting scandal. Enron practiced a type of accounting called mark-to-market practice which it used to hide losses. Mark-to-market accounting it not illegal on its own but it was used improperly by Enron. The CFO and CEO of Enron were able to write off any losses to an off-the-book balance sheet and made the company appear financially healthy (Seabury, 2008). Investors lost $74 billion while thousands of employees lost their jobs and

Enron incurred massive debt as a result of the merger which led to it losing exclusive rights to its pipelines. Enron at this point had to come up with a new innovative business strategy in order to survive. CEO, Kenneth Lay hired services of McKinsey & Co. to aid in the process of developing a business strategy. Jeffrey Skilling, a young consultant was assigned with the responsibility. Skilling proposed a revolutionary solution to convert operations from energy supply to energy trading.

The predecessor of Enron Corporation was an Omaha-based natural gas company created in 1930; steady growth in profits and sales and numerous acquisitions allowed Enron to become the largest natural gas company in the United States by the mid-1980s.

As the management of Enron continued with their fake growth, Enron’s financial contracts started to became more and more complicated.

In 1985 after federal deregulation of natural gas pipelines Enron was formed through a merger of Houston Natural Gas, and Nebraska pipeline company Internorth. Enron went on to create energy derivatives and in 1990 formed Enron Finance Corp. By 1996 Enron had also formed Enron Capital and Trade Resources increasing their growth from $2 billion to $7 billion and increasing division employment from 200 to 2,000. In 1999 Enron entered the technology market by creating Enron Online (EOL). By August of 2000 Enron stock hit its zenith at $90.56/share and the firm was widely admired and emulated. Behind the scenes Enron faced increasing market competition and energy prices began to decline as the world economy entered into a recession. Enron began to use related party transactions and special purpose entities (SPEs) to obscure the firm’s leverage ratios in order to maintain their credit rating. It would be the use of the SPEs that eventually cause Enron to materially restate their financials resulting in their insolvency and demise in 2001 (Thomas, 2002).

In 1985, Houston Natural Gas Company and InterNorth, after federal deregulation of natural gas pipelines, merged to form a new company, Enron. Kenneth Lay had joined Houston Natural Gas before the merger as chairman and CEO. After the merger, Kenneth was appointed chairman and CEO of the newly formed company (Biography.com, n.d.).

Enron began by merger of two Houston pipeline companies in 1985, although as a new company Enron faced a lot of financial difficulties in the starting years, though the company was able to survive these financial problems (Enron Ethics, 2010). In 1988 the deregulation of the electrical power markets came into action and flipped the company from up to down, after deregulation company business updated from delivering energy to becoming an energy broker and soon after this Enron once a company struggling

On October 16, Enron announced a $638 million loss for the third quarter, and Wall Street reduced the value of stockholders’ equity by $1.2 billion. Enron announced November 8, that it had overstated earnings over the past four years by $586 million and that it was responsible for up to $3 billion in obligations to various partnerships. A $23 billion merger from rival Dynegy was dropped November 28 after lenders downgraded Enron’s debt to junk bond status.

Enron Corporation was formed as the result of the July 1985 merger of Houston National Gas and InterNorth of Omaha, Nebraska. Their headquarters were located in Houston, TX. In its earlier years, Enron was a

The Enron Scandal was an enormous controversy in 2001. This scandal went on for years until finally the government caught up with what was going on. In the Enron case, the company was stating that they were making profits from assets even though they were not making any money from it. They would also transfer any information to an off-the-books corporation if they were not making as much as they thought that they should be making. All this information would be unreported so that nobody would know that the company was losing money.

In light of the recent scandals that rose around big multinationals such as Enron and WorldCom, it has become evident that reform in the traditional corporate operations and objectives was to be encompassed in the organisations corporate strategies. Indeed throughout the years, companies main objectives were defined primarily as being economic objectives, Multinationals developed with sight of profit maximisations regardless to the other incentives, Friedman considered that to be the foundation for a well-managed company, it was further considered that the financing of any other sort of social corporate activities rather unnecessary. The expenses were regarded as expenditures for the owners and investors; this was a time where shareholders rights were regarded as conflicting with other constituents namely the employees, creditors, customers or the community in general. However this interpretation is seen as rather inadequate due to the nature of the amalgamated relation between both constituents. Stakeholders in modern corporate doctrine are considered as a core apparatus for the well functioning of a business. It is however often argued that the only way for a corporation to achieve better results and maximise its profits is to include other people in the process, individuals or organisations with direct or indirect interest in the well performance of the company, that is the reason why modern regulations and codes include a number of stakeholders other than the

Ethics in the business world can often times become a second priority behind the gaining of profits and success as a company. This is the controversial issue that led to the Enron scandal and ultimately the fall of this company. Enron Corporation was an energy company, and in the peaks of their success, they were the top supplier of natural gas and electricity throughout America. Enron Corporation came about from a merger between Houston Natural Gas and InterNorth. Houston Natural Gas was a gas providing company formed in Houston during the 1920’s. InterNorth was a company formed in Nebraska during the 1930’s and owned one of America’s largest pipeline networks. In 1985, Sam Segnar, the CEO of InterNorth bought out Houston Natural Gas for $2.4 billion. A year later in 1986, Segnar retired and was replaced by Kenneth Lay, who renamed the company and created Enron. Enron was the owner of the second largest pipeline in America that measured over 36,000 miles. The company was also the creator of the “Gas Bank”, which was a new way to trade and market natural gas and served as an intermediary between buyers and sellers. As the company continued to develop, it became more of a trader rather than a producer of gas. This trading extended into coal, steel, water and many other areas. One of Enron’s largest successes was their creation of a website called, “Enron Online” in 1999, which quickly became one of the top trading cites in the world. By the year 2000 Enron as a company was

The story of Enron begins in 1985, with the merger of two pipeline companies, orchestrated by a man named Kenneth L. Lay (1). In its 15 years of existence, Enron expanded its operations to provide products and services in the areas of electricity, natural gas as well as communications (9). Through its diversification, Enron would become known as a corporate America darling (9) and Fortune Magazine’s most innovative company for 5 years in a row (10). They reported extraordinary profits in a short amount of time. For example, in 1998 Enron shares were valued at a little over $20, while in mid-2000, those same shares were valued at just over $90 (10), the all-time high during the company’s existence (9).

Enron was formed through the merger of Houston Natural Gas of Houston (HNG), Texas and InterNorth. Houston natural gas covered the Florida and California market, their pipelines running from east to west and InterNorth catered the Iowa and Minnesota market, their pipelines running from north to south. HNG was formed in 1920, providing gas to retail customers in Houston. The company sold its retail gas business in 1920 and ventured into the gas exploration and production business. In the year 1984, HNG had $3.7 billion in assets, over $2 billion in sales and booked profits of $123 million. InterNorth was a natural pipeline company located in Omaha, Nebraska. In 1984 InterNorth had revenues of $7.5 billion. The reason behind the merger was that InterNorth faced the threat of a buyout by corporate raiders as it had low debt and high revenues. The conservative operations and low debt of InterNorth made it a target for corporate raiders who planned to use its cash reserves and borrowing capacity to extract funds for themselves. On the other hand HNG Company had borrowed heavily to expand its pipelines in the Florida and California markets. Therefore merging with Houston Natural Gas made perfect sense as it fended off corporate raiders. In May 1984 InterNorth acquired HNG for $2.4 billion, under the leadership of Sam Segnar who was the CEO of InterNorth at that time. The negotiations for HNG were handled by John Wing and he was able to negotiate a price for HNG shares which were