Act 2 Scene 1 Of William Shakespeare 's Macbeth Essay

Generally speaking the mind can react differently to the same prompt due to the structure which it was formed from. Phycologist 's say there are ways to trick the mind into seeing or feeling a certain way. Consequently, how people perceive an act changes depending how it was performed. Whereas Shakespeare 's plays brought about an emotional appeal to the readers. Granted , in society today it has become more complex yet easier to make an act retrieve an emotional response from watchers or readers. Furthermore, Williamson and Stewart both perform the same scene from Act 2 Scene 1 of William Shakespeare 's play Macbeth ; yet their setting, sound effect, tone, facial expressions and appearance differ.

going to go back on his word, he doesn't really love her, and he's a

Tony Robbins said, “To effectively communicate, we must realize that we are all different in the way we perceive the world and use this understanding as a guide to our communication with others”. Shakespeare’s writing has had many different ways of being presented because people perceive it in different ways. Whether it is a literal representation or a spin, directors like to show viewers the way they perceive the text. In the movie version of Hamlet the director, Kenneth Branagh, wanted the viewers to find Shakespeare interesting and full of action and drama. Kenneth chose the right direction to go in to keep the audience’s attention but it

In acts 1 and 2 of the play “Macbeth” by Shakespeare, the characters Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are presented to the audience through soliloquies and dialogue between the two. Macbeth is presented as brave, ambitious and guilty in Acts 1 and 2 of the play through the way others describe him, what he says and how he internally feels, and Lady Macbeth is presented as being determined and driven.

When comparing two different Hamlet movies I found that one scene in particular was obviously more different than the others. I compared Columbia pictures 1996 version with Kenneth Branagh playing the role of Hamlet versus BBC’s 2009 Hamlet in which David Tennant played the honorable role of Hamlet. When comparing both movies I found a lot of similarities but there was one major difference when I compared the “To be or not to be” scene. The scenes vary in multiple ways whether it is lighting, focus, camera movements, and even the actors that play Hamlet.

of this is the marriage scene. In the marriage scene of the play, Romeo and

One example is, during the character's monologues. This is especially true during Bennedick's monologue. During his monologue the actor speaks of his recent interaction with Beatrice, in which she criticizes him to his face thinking he was someone else. In the classic Kenneth Branagh version, the director uses paradigm3 filming techniques to create a simple importance to the emotion that the character/actor emotes. In the Branagh version, Bennedick is well directed to speak the word of Shakespeare, the director uses the close-up so the emotion is much bestowed unto the audience. So when he speaks of feeling shock and distaste towards Beatrice the audience easily connects to that. In the same instance, the BBC version uses film techniques that gloss over the raw emotion of Shakespeare. For instance, during Bennedick’s same monologue the director uses a neutral shot, at the eye-level angle. This causes distraction because the audience’s eye isn’t immediately drawn to the characters face. Instead it is drawn to the extras in costumes walking by or standing around, and to the overall aura of the character. This is much less intense, hence less effective. In like manner, the Joss Whedon uses a medium shot at a neutral angle during this monologue. Although, in the Joss Whedon version the monochromatic tint, and acting choices make the monologue seem very casual. This

Many people throughout the world have read and watched the Crucible. One may think the play is more accurate or that the movie is more accurate. In 1997 the movie was nominated for an Oscar, and the Golden Globes. The movie has won many awards, and had many award winning actors. The movie gives people a better picture of what life looked like during the Salem Witch Trials than the play.

In the movie they very graphically show the hangings of some specific characters. I consider this a big difference because they have a different view of importance on the event. the play apparently does not show enough dramatic emphasis on the hanging of innocent accused victims. The movie shows the hanging and very well emphasizes the hanging by showing graphic details such as the ropes around their necks and their feet hanging from the opened trap doors in the underneath stage the hanging takes place on. The director of the movie and the director and author of the play have different views on the hanging and it makes a big difference in the

Laurence Sterne once wrote, “No body, but he who has felt it, can conceive what a plaguing thing it is to have a man’s mind torn asunder by two projects of equal strength, both obstinately pulling in a contrary direction at the same time.” This passage embodies one of the over arching themes of Macbeth. The character Macbeth, in Shakespeare’s tragedy Macbeth, could easily identify with this passage due to the fact that he is pulled in opposite directions by both his desire to do what is right and his desire for power.

It Can Only Go Up (A Critical discussion of the Importance of Act Four Scene two in Macbeth.) Out of any of Shakespeare’s plays whether it be Romeo and Juliet, Julius Caesar, A Midsummer Night’s Dream and or Macbeth, each play has its own significant scene which reveals all the key themes and essential details that Shakespeare wants to get across. If you can only read one scene and still be able to gain all the essential details and themes portrayed in the playwright Hamlet, which would it be? This is a very debatable topic; although there obviously must be an answer. Act four scene two of Macbeth covers all three of the key ideas that say; the idea of going mad, manhood, and bad irony.

In the first scene, I prefered the way Branagh portrayed Horatio and Marcellus rather than Mel Gibson’s portrayal. However, the actors in Gibson’s version were far superior at acting. In Gibson’s, I also found that the actors chosen to be guards were more burly and bruting in comparison, and they were more believable to be guards.

In an interview Ethan Hawke (Hamlet in Hamlet 2000) stated “memorizing Shakespeare's dialogue for the first time, using the natural Iambic Pentameter. It works in a rhythm, and the rhythm perpetuates itself. It's easier than learning a volume of contemporary prose. Also, his ideas are very logical” making it sound as if memorizing his lines had been easy. Shakespeare is known for his rhythmic writing style. When Hamlet speaks it flows and sounds natural. Hawke also said “ the subtext of the characters is all right there in the writing. Everything they're thinking and feeling is presented to you” and you can see that in his acting. Hamlets offbeat manner and eccentrically passive style is what makes believable. The rest of the cast, however, seems to lack the ability to be as convincing.

Rather than using highly descriptive stage directions in his comedic play Twelfth Night, Shakespeare uses techniques like such as character development and dialogue to guide the audience’s response to major characters and their actions. The play includes characters who fulfill the responsibilities of a narrator, which helps the audience focus on broad lessons each character is supposed to learn. The audience’s ability to follow character action is also affected by the use of dialogue and asides to reveal character’s feelings and specific character relationships.

This is relevant to the original performance conditions as it had a direct effect on rehearsals and staging. Over time stage directions have become more descriptive and extensive, with the author having a much more detailed image of what they want a scene to look like or the characters to be like. When talking of the rehearsal process itself, the putting together of the piece, Shakespeare’s work was not like this – each actor received their own lines and small indications of cues, never actually setting their