preview

Adultery In The 1600s

Decent Essays

Adultery is commonly known from the Bible as a “conjugal infidelity. An adulterer was a man who had illicit intercourse with a married or a betrothed woman, and such a woman was an adulteress. Intercourse between a married man and an unmarried woman was fornication” (Elwell, “Entry for Adultery”.” Evangelical Dictionary of Theology). The idea of this very word isn’t taken quite serious or into consideration as a sin from the Bible nowadays. The 1600s was a time when the Puritan societies were based on the laws and concepts from the Bible, and that the very word “Adultery” was the worst thing that could have ever been done in these communities. In fact, people were rather sentenced to death if they ever did this. Nathaniel Hawthorne discussed …show more content…

They wanted to make sure they didn’t live a life of sin. Hester Prynne, the main character from the novel lived in one of these communities, where she aroused the public’s eye by copulating with the town’s minister, Rev. Dimmesdale in secrecy. Eventually leading to the birth of a baby girl named Pearl whom nobody knew who the actual father was. Leading to a series of rumors among her church community where all the women gossip about the statement, “‘This woman has brought shame upon us all, and ought to die; Is there not law for it?” (Pg. 79). Within in this society, the Puritans believed the church rules the government, so if anybody sinned they should be condemned to death. All sins in their eyes were punished, no exceptions. Yet, in the case of Hester, she couldn’t be sentenced to death because her refusal to identify the father of her newborn would halt the investigation of the father. In the community, to know who the father was of the newborn girl was essential for them to eliminate the corruption going on in the community; the idea was proven to be a …show more content…

For example, in the novel Hester who was no longer justified her as a pure person, but a dark enmity that spawned the devil’s child and corrupted her church’s system of power in the little community of Boston. Signifying how the church’s power was no longer effective or strong enough to dictate the best decisions that they felt were needed to keep the community in order. “This wave of “church planting” has been highest among nondenominational pastors, free to experiment outside traditional hierarchies.” (O’Leary, Building Congregations Around Art Galleries and Cafes as Spirituality Wanes). In other words, this explains how today’s churches have abandoned the traditional principles the church once had over the state. Churches rather mind their own business about marital affairs and instead advocate why it’s best, to be honest, and to not cheat rather than convict people. An article once stated, “Puritans were self-righteous and authoritarian, bent on making everyone conform to a rigid set of rules and ostracizing everyone who disagreed with them”.(Hall, Peace, Love, and Puritanism) Churches today aspire to branch out on their own principles they feel fit to bring the community together; not to single people out because of their beliefs or choices. The need to feel unity and peace where everybody

Get Access