Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Fixed Exchange Rate System

Making an absolute decision whether a stronger U.S. dollar is good or bad is tough call. I will have to agree with you that it can be good and bad for the U.S. economy. A stronger U.S. dollar would definitely enable U.S. citizens to purchase more of both domestic and imported products. You brought up valid point about the unaffordability of U.S. exports for other countries if the U.S. has a stronger dollar. Another factor to also consider is the possibility of a stronger US dollar having a negative effect on employment for those who work in export related industries. If other countries can't afford the products we make, our workers will be let go from their jobs. Now in a society without jobs, the US takes on the burden of more citizens unemployed.

Well it’s not good special for international student, we have to change more in our currency money to be US dollar. When U.S dollars stronger than national currency, import are less expensive. So American people can buy products good and services cheaper. In face it will lead to increase demand for the currency needed to purchase products and imported products because you can buy more products or the product is cheaper and it increase the economies in US. For example, we order clothes from china the same amount of money, we can buy more cloth and we won’t have to spend many money to do it. But for the business local currency becomes weak and down in valve, then the products in US are importing become more expensive. Also increase in the demand on the foreign change market more increases the price of its currency, Other country become demanding more US Dollars in order to pay for these services and commodities. International labor increase more if US dollars more strong so They can change US dollars more money in their countries, Changes in nationwide incomes in foreign countries as well as in the United States. On other hand export less because US dollars strong and other countries decrease demand products from US because US products good is more expensive. Also people buy foreign products rather than domestically produced goods and become to effect to US export. It capacity make business

The beneficial effects on the economy may take as much as two years to be fully felt. I Further, the UK should be careful not to rely on a weak currency in order to support its competitiveness. An Exchange rates tend to fluctuate in value over time and the strongest economies are usually those with high productivity and low production costs, or those which produce highly innovative products. The long term performance of the UK economy could be adversely affected if a weakening of the currency was allowed to distract from these more fundamental determinants of economic performance. An Overall, however, in the current context, a weakening of Sterling is likely to be seen as beneficial for the UK economy, helping to support it through a difficult time and aiding a rebalancing of the economy towards the export sector. Despite this, it should be remembered that in other contexts, for example when controlling inflation is a more pressing problem, a fall in the exchange rate could be damaging.

The US dollar is used in the majority of the international transactions and therefore that happens to the American economy, will influence the international financial resources. Dollars bring big consequences both for the USA and for other countries. The economy of many countries depends on currency dollar. The increase in its course reduces the volume of the income in dollars for the country. And change of US dollar more considerably, than change of an exchange rate of the country. On the

Before we look at these forces, we should sketch out how exchange rate movements affect a nation 's trading relationships with other nations. A higher currency makes a country 's exports more expensive and imports cheaper in foreign markets; a lower currency makes a country 's exports cheaper and its imports more expensive in foreign markets. A higher exchange rate can be expected to lower the country 's balance of trade, while a lower exchange rate would increase it.

Currency exchange rates can be categorised as floating, in which case they constantly change based on a number of factors, or they can subsequently be fixed to another currency, where they still float, but they additionally move in conjunction with the currency to which they are pegged. Floating rates are a reflection of market movement, demonstrating the principles of both demand and supply, as well as limit imbalances in the international financial system. Fixed exchange rates are predominantly used by developing countries as they are preferred for their greater stability. They grant further control to central banks to set currency values, and are often used to evade market abuse. (MacEachern, A. 2008; Simmons, P.

When the domestic currency goes up against a foreign currency, it makes imports of goods cheaper and exports more expensive. So domestic businesses that import a lot (i.e. retailers such as Debenhams) would be happy and exporters (i.e. coal miners) would be unhappy. As it will cost cheaper for domestic imports. This will not be a loss of profit for

Canada’s economy has to face many issues. One of these being the rate of exchange. The canadian dollar has been going up and down constantly throughout many years. “The first paper money issued in Canada nominated in dollars were British Army notes, issued through 1813, The Bank of Canada was created in 1934 and given responsibility, through an Act of Parliament.” Much has happened to the dollar throughout the years; the economy always varied depending on the dollar worth because it has always played a major role on the economy. Pertaining to the issues of the exchange rate, I will discuss two main ways of it and how it plays a big role on the economy in present times.

A macroeconomic policy is known at the government’s regulations to control or stimulate aggregate indicators for the economy. In other words, these are policies that focus on providing solutions to help stimulate economic growth and fight financial situations; in this case the recession. The macroeconomic policy that would be a legitimate solution to the recession would be Fiscal Policy, but more specifically, Expansionary Fiscal Policy. The reason why this would be a legitimate solution is because unlike Expansionary Monetary Policy, it has a more direct effect on aggregate demand. In other words, the government will aim to increase how much money is spent in order to stimulate aggregate demand. Furthermore, potential tax cuts will serve as a catalyst for spiking aggregate demand by granting people the capability to consume and invest (Forsythe, 2012). As an ultimate effect, the recession that America is going through will show more direct signs of economic growth, and will not have much of an influence in sparking inflation in the long

Strong is good. Weak is bad. These generalizations sound simple enough, but they can be very confusing when come to money. Is a "strong" U.S. dollar always good? Is a "weak" dollar always bad? Understanding of it is a necessary in marketplace. The term such as “Strong” and “weak” dollar is a “hot topic” which always bandied about by economist on a daily basis and also public. This issue is so important to almost every one. It seems like part and parcel of people who very concern about currency likes investors, economist, foreigners who study or working in the United State and so on.

During the financial crisis, the Fed’s monetary policy and the Treasury’s fiscal policy were both expansionary and thus essentially complementary to each other. Both policies aimed at stimulating the economic activities and stabilizing the credit market and the entire financial system. During the crisis, the inflation rate dropped significantly as the commodity prices plummeted, which freed the Fed from worrying about inflation risk. The foreign investors poured their money into the U.S. Treasury, allowing the U.S. government to borrow at extremely low interest rates. The various actions taken by the Treasury and the Fed served to work together to address the problems which were critical to save the U.S. financial system from collapse and to end the most severe recession since the Great Depression.

With the economy constantly changing, we are starting to see drastic changes in our dollar. A countries currency determines their strength in the market and their inflation rate. With a higher inflation rate, they are able to buy more and do more for a cheaper price. To help us better understand the difference between the weak dollar and the strong dollar, we will go in depth with both weak and strong dollars and its advantages and disadvantages, the currency monitor, the causes of the weak and strong dollar, and how it fluctuates and affects operations.

Consequences regarding the international businesses and the flow of trade and investment among the three countries are given below as benefits and drawbacks of holding fixed exchange rate system-

As interest rates bottomed out quickly after the onset of the recession, the Federal Reserve could no longer stimulate the economy with traditional and time-tested techniques. The controversial and unconventional method chosen by the Federal Reserve, and other central banks around the world, is known as “quantitative easing” (QE). QE functions by injecting large amounts of reserve capital into commercial banks with the hope that those banks will then be willing to lend the money at affordable interest rates. Ideally, the addition to economic activity affected by the influx of capital to banks should keep the value of the dollar relatively low, avoiding deflation and encouraging foreign investment by those wishing to take advantage of an affordable dollar. The cheaper dollar should also make American exports look more attractive to potential consumers in other countries. If interest rates stay low, and banks begin lending again, consumer and investor confidence should hopefully rise, leading to more spending and thus, economic growth.

Monetary policy effects the GDP inflation. “Between 1996 and 2000, real GDP in the United States expanded briskly and the price level rose only slowly. The economy experienced neither significant unemployment nor inflation. Some observes felt that the United States had entered a “new ear” in which business cycle was dead. But that wishful thinking came to an end in March 2001, when the economy entered its ninth recession since 1950. Since 1970, real GDP has declined in the United States in five periods: 1973-1975, 1980, 1981-1982, 1990-1991 and