Perhaps Americans take what they have for granted and forget that there are other countries with problems. Why does America care about what is happening in other countries like Columbia, when they have their own problems with drugs? The Untied States of America has a rather large drug trafficking problem but compared to Columbia it is fairly small. To help Columbia solve their problem the U.S. senate has decided to send troops over there and take control. This new involvement will have many consequences in and what can you make for instance the cost of a war, the loss and gain of jobs, and physical side effects.
Now war is a very serious subject to study for sociologists, this gives them a chance to study people and how they react to
…show more content…
According to Sociologists war is very interesting, it shows many different sides of people that are usually hidden by everyday rituals. In war the loss of money or the gain of it can be cauterized under the Structural-Functional paradigm because in war there are consequences. Some consequences of lost money are starving people, unclean because of no utilities, and deathly ill people. Now war has many upsides with money America can win the war and be reimbursed if they succeeded in against the drug lords and drugs all together.
The Positives of war for America and job gain is that people who do not have any jobs can get one either fighting in the war or helping the troops at base camp with cooking and cleaning. Also other interesting and less dangerous are jobs building guns and tanks and other machines, these provide the poor with jobs. Now the gain of jobs for Columbia are pretty much the same but they too employ or the drug lords do to help them cut package and deliver the drugs. With a war they need to do things quickly so they get can stop of the product before they are can. Also those who have dedicated their whole life into dealing or selling drugs will end up poor or homeless. There are many consequences when employing people for war because when the war is through they those people that were hired will lose
For many years, drugs have been the center of crime and the criminal justice system in the United States. Due to this widespread epidemic, President Richard Nixon declared the “War on Drugs” in 1971 with a campaign that promoted the prohibition of illicit substances and implemented policies to discourage the overall production, distribution, and consumption. The War on Drugs and the U.S. drug policy has experienced the most significant and complex challenges between criminal law and the values of today’s society. With implemented drug polices becoming much harsher over the years in order to reduce the overall misuse and abuse of drugs and a expanded federal budget, it has sparked a nation wide debate whether or not they have created more harm than good. When looking at the negative consequences of these policies not only has billions of dollars gone to waste, but the United States has also seen public health issues, mass incarceration, and violent drug related crime within the black market in which feeds our global demands and economy. With this failed approach for drug prohibition, there continues to be an increase in the overall production of illicit substances, high rate of violence, and an unfavorable impact to our nation.
Supposedly 90% of all U.S. dollars in circulation, including the $13,304,844,056 dollars spent by the U.S. to date in the War on Drugs have trace amounts of cocaine on them. Of the $13,304,844,056, $9 billion in foreign aid has been endowed to Colombia, where nearly 100% of the cocaine that is imported to the U.S. originates. The U.S. is as addicted to coke as coke is to it. The ongoing Colombian conflict between the Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia (FARC), the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), and the government of Colombia has been raging for nearly 52 years. Yet, the 1990-2015 era of the conflict is the most notable due to the mass proliferation of cocaine. After the cartels receded from preeminence in Colombia, the nation
War Is Not The Answer War is never the answer. People can never get anything out of it because in the end, there is just going to be more chaos. In the book, My Brother Sam Is Dead by James and Christopher Collier, a lot of the hard times for the American Revolution are presented with the Meeker Family. The main characters are Sam and Tim Meeker along with the supporting characters, Mr. and Mrs. Meeker. In My Brother Sam Is Dead, both sides of war are shown, author's Collier and Collier ultimately argue that war is not going to achieve anything.
The War on Drugs not only has many acts that have been in place due to it, but there has been a domino effect with other topics. The War on Drugs has become a complicated, yet important aspect of the U.S. as well as other countries. It was to be believed that the War on Drugs has influenced incarceration. This effect was the ability to imprison those who are using drugs, and the amount of crime will begin to decrease (Lloyd, 2015). Margaret Lloyd (2015), also discussed how a community that has less crime could be a better living area for children, in hopes they will not act in deviant behaviors.
The United States has a long history of intervention in the affairs of one it’s southern neighbor, Latin America. The war on drugs has been no exception. An investigation of US relations with Latin America in the period from 1820 to 1960, reveals the war on drugs to be a convenient extension of an almost 200 year-old policy. This investigation focuses on the commercial and political objectives of the US in fighting a war on drugs in Latin America. These objectives explain why the failing drug policy persisted despite its overwhelming failure to decrease drug production or trafficking. These objectives also explain why the US has recently exchanged a war on drugs for the war on
The War on Drugs, like the war on Terrorism, is a war that America may not be able to afford to win. For over forty years the United States has been fighting the War on Drugs and there is no end in sight. It has turned into a war that is about politics and economics rather than about drugs and criminals. The victims of this war are numerous; but perhaps they are not as numerous as those who benefit from the war itself.
On February 28, 2017, President Donald Trump delivered his first address to Congress, and among the key topics, the President focused on the ongoing War on Drugs and its relation to Mexico. In his a little over an hour-long speech, President Trump went from highlighting drug abuse as a major problem among Americans and proposed possible policies to aid in stopping the problem.
Furthermore, Colombia’s drug trafficking history has hindered its path to development also. The largest cocaine smuggling cartels were the Medellin Cartel led by the notorious drug lord Pablo Escobar and the Cali Cartel ran by the Rodriguez Orejuela brothers and Santacruz Londono. Pablo Escobar was a very violent man that let success go to his head. His quest for power within government created a lot of violence between his cartel and the government (Frontline, n.d.). Escobar was tracked down and killed by the Colombian police then the Cali Cartel took over. They ran their smuggling business with finesse and professionalism. They hired lawyers to study DEA laws, they sold cocaine to government officials and police officers, and gave donations to government officials as well. The list of officials included former president Ernesto Samper ( Frontiline,
The War on Drugs has been a common phrase in the United States for many decades. What exactly does this mean and how does it shape U.S. foreign policy? The War on Drugs can be defined as the systematic and aggressive policy that is determined to undermine and stop the flow of illegal drugs into the United States. This policy is backed by several U.S. institutions including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), U.S. Army, U.S. Coast Guard, and U.S. Customs. Also, included in this list are the numerous local law enforcement agencies across the country.
Sending more troops to end this war may be one solution for Mexico. Many Mexican soldiers work with drug lords and cartel members. Mexican soldiers can be seen riding around to gain trust from local citizens. Citizens often mistrust soldiers because of their long history of human right abuse. People who were suspected of dealing narcotics, or any affiliation with rival cartels made them a target for crooked Mexican soldiers. Any killings done by crooked soldiers, or hit men came from the orders of head cartel members. Sending out more crooked soldiers to fight, people they work for could fuel more violence. This is the only option the Mexican government has to try and defeat the mexican drug cartels. Other countries need to be more involved to bring this drug war to an end. The U.S sends soldiers to fight across the globe, and help with national crisis. Mexico shares close geographical, and also close cultural ties with the U.S. These mexican citizens are living in a country where everything going on is reported, but no action is taken to stop these incidents. Cartels are taking over parts of Mexico, and without a clear understanding of what they are doing, violence will only continue to increase. There have been an overwhelming amount of deaths because of this ongoing drug war. Would legalizing a portion of the cartels main revenue me beneficial to Mexico, or only fuel more violence? If the United States were to legalize marijuana in only a
Starting in 1914 the U.S introduced the first probation acts that prohibited the consumption of Opiates and Cocaine with the Harrison Narcotics act of 1914 Later this act was amended to include marijuana. This Act was the first use of federal criminal law in the United Sates to attempt to deal with the nonmedical use of drugs (wisegeek). The war of drugs started primarily in the 1971 when Nixon declared the war on drugs. He dramatically increased the size and presence of federal drug control agencies (Drug Policy). With the first major organized drug imports from Columbia from the Black Tuna Gang based in Miami, Florida Columbia was quickly growing into a drug superpower able to feed America’s growing addictions.
Nowadays, when someone thinks of Colombia, they unfortunately almost always think of two things, coffee and cocaine (with its associated guerilla warfare). It is true that during the last 50 years these two products, one legal, and the other not, have been great monetary contributors to the Colombian economy. Coffee is Colombia’s principal agricultural product, and it is also the country’s second largest export. The production of coffee uses 300,000 farms and employs almost one million people (Steiner 6). Conversely, cocaine is a completely illegal product, but it earns almost twice as much money as coffee (Steiner 6). Also, in contrast with the production of coffee, cocaine uses fewer employees but earns
Imagine a prison full of sick people, and what is their crime? The illness that they have. This is what is currently happening in the US because of the drug war. The US is imprisoning drug addicts instead of helping them recover. The drug war needs to reform its strategies and and laws to benefit America rather than tear it apart. The drug war has dragged on far to long on the same failing techniques. The drug war is having the same effect as prohibition in the early 20th century, and is costing us money, and the well being of our youth.
There was more information written about the aftermath of both world wars than past centuries. The research of war can be divided into various categories : philosophical , political, economic ,technological, and more. Theories of war are based on if it was afflicting by one nation towards another or towards humanity in general. The research of peace is reduced to the analysis of the international system and the empirical study of the phenomenon of war. Theorists argue that there are groups who benefit from wars economically. The groups that benefit the most from war are : Capitalists, financiers and individuals who are involved in industries who indulge in war. They do not see the bigger picture which is the amount of money that is being spent on individuals who are in the armed forces. This clearly states there are some individuals who do not think world peace is
A new report indicates that the economic cost of lost productivity from drug-related incarcerations is considerably higher than the cost associated with drug use. The Prime Minister of your country is weighing the option of proposing new legislation which experiments with models of legal regulation of certain illicit drugs, including the decriminalization of marijuana possession. The proposed policy has received sharp criticism from members of the law enforcement, as well as groups of parents and other constituencies who believe that the government should pursue the goal of a “drug-free” society.