preview

An Analysis Of Richard's Abbey

Decent Essays

Glimpses of monk societies are vastly present in Richard's (the chronicler) accounts of the Crusade and through his intimate knowledge of monastic life. Richard's monastery at Winchester and possibly others had access to ancient writers such as Ovid (3) and Vergil (12) to supplement their works. This shows a possible increase in fascination for the Roman Empire and its literary works. References to ancient authors and poets can be found throughout the chronicle when opportunities present themselves. Though mostly talking about monks that follow the Rule of St. Benedict, he begins by dedicating the chronicle to a former prior of the monastery who went to the Carthusian order of monks (1). This can show that some monks changed not only their …show more content…

Unfortunately it does not give an explanation for why the monks (as Richard was not allowed to go alone) went to another monastery following a different Rule (1). Richard then talks about the differences in the two societies and gives his thoughts on them. He points out a rule that he considers a mystery stating that “in each ... cell there is ... one door ... through which you may not go out, except in such a way that one foot always stays short of the threshold and inside the cell” (1). He might be taking this a bit literally. It could simply mean that they are not allowed to fully leave at certain times, or that they are not allowed to leave without another monk present (since most of them lived …show more content…

and yet you know everything that is done in the world as soon as it takes places, and sometimes ... in advance (2)”. This problem plagued many monasteries that set themselves up away from society to focus on their works, only to have a small city or village be created around them. This can show that the interaction between monks and laity was not as infrequent as some would believe. This can also show that some monks were not ones to shy away from the occasional gossip. To this he adds that the Carthusian monks (if they know of happenings outside of their walls) are not following their “rule of silence”(2). Richard again critiques the Carthusians saying that they “cut ... [their] charity to strangers in half, by giving them a blessing without a meal” (2). This shows another difference between the two groups of monks and their attitudes towards the needy. An interesting point to be made is that Richard says “strangers” not “anyone”. This can be taken to mean that the poor of their village were given meals and blessings while travellers would only receive a blessing without the meal. Another interesting point is that the monasteries were often used as hospices for

Get Access