An Elephant Crackup By Charles Siebert Essay

Elephant has long been known as one of man’s best friends, who have peacefully coexisted along with humanity for thousands of years. However, the relationship between the two is no longer in the equilibrium state. In “An Elephant Crackup?”, Charles Siebert discusses the downfall of the elephants. He gives a depiction of the recent raging and violent acts of the elephants among themselves and toward other species, including humans, and presents an educated and almost unexpected explanation to their

If you’re not paying attention, the mind can be a tricky labyrinth. The less you know about it, the more inexplicable and frightening it becomes. For example, why do seemingly benign elephants wreak havoc upon villages? In “An Elephant Crackup,” Charles Siebert explores the aberrant nature of these elephants and correlates them to their traumatizing upbringing, deprived of community and kinship. The biochemistry of the human mind, analyzed in Love 2.0 by Barbara Frederickson, serves as a worthy addendum

dramatic toll on the way animals’ function in the 21st century. Particularly, an account that focuses on this dramatic toll is that of Charles Siebert’s, an essayist whose observations bring a fascinating perspective to the correlation between wildlife habitat disruption and uninhibited human nature. Siebert’s essay for The New York Times Magazine, entitled, “An Elephant Crackup?” has raised many eyebrows over the past few years with regard to the destruction of a species that might suffer from something

convenient and inexpensive” (Moss 262). Whereas, in An Elephant Crackup?, by Charles Siebert, we assimilate the fact that “elephant behavior is entirely congruent with what we know about humans and other mammals” (Siebert 357). The dynamics of a “precipitous collapse of elephant culture” or “crackup” described by Charles Siebert, in An Elephant Crackup?, can be used to analyze and understand America’s relationship with processed food because elephants are observed through an anthropomorphized lens. It

between the psychology of an individual and groups? Collective and individual behavior is surprisingly similar, and depending on the circumstances, identical. In Charles Siebert essay “An Elephant Crackup,” he validates to readers, through social elephant narratives and herd mentality theory, that similarly to an individual elephant all elephants behave in similar ways. Furthermore, Sherry Turkle in selections from her work Alone Together accounts for individuals’ reactions to emerging robotic social

acts toward other species and human beings. In his article, “An Elephant Crackup,” Charles Siebert depicts the violence that humans have done toward the elephant culture and how humans should put a stop to these acts and save elephants from extinction. With his strong defense on elephants, Siebert gives the reader a better

If you’re not paying attention, the mind can be a tricky labyrinth. The less you know about it, the more inexplicable and frightening it becomes. For example, why do seemingly benign elephants wreak havoc upon villages? In “An Elephant Crackup,” Charles Siebert explores the aberrant nature of these elephants and correlates them to their traumatizing upbringing, deprived of community and kinship. The biochemistry of the human mind, analyzed in “Love2.0” by Barbara Frederickson, serves as a worthy

behavior claims that the small details that are present, such as the context, subconsciously plays a big part into our actions and behaviors more than the big picture. Two texts, “Project: Classroom Makeover” by Cathy Davidson, and “An Elephant Crackup?” by Charles Siebert provides further evidence to support Gladwell’s philosophy. In the text “The Power of Context”, Gladwell explains the importance of looking at the little

companies in Ethan Watters’ “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan” with various types of researchers and marketing scholars under their umbrella. The hegemony perpetuated by these systems are not just limited to humans, as in Charles Siebert’s “An Elephant Crackup?” the elephant society is severely oppressed by government agencies who acted as a direct consequence to the behaviors of hunters and poachers. In such institutions, there can exist two distinct groups of individuals: those who enter a larger

Zainab Jafri Mr. Ballinger ENG-101-ML 3 October, 2016 Intrusions Leading to Decays Although elephants and humans are different species, they share some important psychological and cultural tendencies from which we can learn. Elephants are not only known for being religious symbols, but they are also recognized for being a main source of income- much like processed foods in America. In The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food, Michael Moss reports on the role of the media and how major food