In my opinion, I don’t think that it is fair for professional athlete to have higher salaries than public servants. In today’s society, salaries are wages are supposed to be based on the value of one work. For example, teachers are those unique individual who have a have a direct influence on the society because our future economy depend on the education of its youth. Unlike other professions, they see the changes they affect and see their work in action. They have a direct interactions with the people who they are helping and inspire those they teach. Likewise, doctors saves lives and heal those who are ill. But athletes on the other hand only provide entertainment for the society. While most do go to college, it is nothing compare to the
Do you want to get paid for playing a sport in college? (http://www.experienceproject.com/question-answer.php) College players should receive some payment for playing for their schools. College athletes put their bodies on the line each game they play, paying college athletes would help to begin creating a sense of financial awareness, (https://smartasset.com/retirement/should-student-athletes-be-paid ) and some athletes don't have enough money to pay for food or stuff they need and with the money they have left over they can buy things.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has been rewarding University athletic programs across the nation for many years now. Allowing coaching staff and others to make money off of the athletes in these programs. Athletes, however, do not get any compensation for the hard work they put in to earn the National Collegiate Athletic Association the multi- million dollars of revenue each year. The athletes are expected to give an “all in” type effort while keeping up with their rigorous courses. A recent ruling that Northwestern University football players have the right to unionize and begin to receive that compensation from the NCAA proved many people wrong and stirred up the pot between supports and non supporters.
College athletics are incredibly popular today. College athletics bring great things to colleges around the United States. However, there have been problems that come with college athletics. There has been a huge discussion lately over if college athletes should be paid. College athletes put a lot of effort into their sport, earn money for their school, and skip many days of school. However, some of the lesser sports don't earn the big money that some sports make for the school, athletes would all pick one school depending on the salary they earn, and colleges already provide full scholarships towards students.
College athletes are taken advantage of on a daily basis. Student athletes have to spend all day in class having to meet vigorous academic requirements well also having to stay competitive in sports. For doing so much you think the NCAA would at least give them some money to live off. When students have no money they are more likely to sell their autographs or take money from boosters. When students accept money from boosters it not only affects the player but it affects the team. Some ways that it affects the whole team is by reducing the amount of scholarships a team can give out that year. It could also affect their college playoff hopes by not allowing them to participate in their college bowl games.
The question has been tosses around for a while now. Why should college athletes be paid? They should be paid only if the college can afford it. What this means is that if a division three college can only afford to supply scholarships to athletes that’s fine, but the problem comes in when division one colleges make millions and millions of dollars along with the NCAA while athletes only get scholarships around $40,000 dollars. Another example of inequality is that coaches not just colleges can be made multimillionaires within one season of coaching. One example of that is University of Kentucky Coach John Calipari.
Did you know that the average men’s basketball fair market value per player is $289,031 per year, and they don’t get not a thing from it, isn’t that crazy. This is very unfair because if the college athletes have to play their best even when they're sick or hurt and who is the real winner the NCAA because they’re the ones that get the money. College athletes should be paid because they work so hard in the classroom and it the gym because they have to do double what everyone else does. They need money to live because when you’re a college athlete you don’t have time for a job with your tight
The average annual salary for division 1 football coaches is $1.64 million. While the highest paid coach is making $7.6 million annually, the student athletes are not paid at all. The NCAA argues that the players are fully compensated because most have full-ride scholarships and are attending the school for free. But, college athletes spend an average of 43.3 hours per week training for their respective sport. So, they spend more time training for their sport than the average American spends working at a full-time job. The NCAA doesn’t even let the athletes advertise themselves. But, if the NCAA did begin legally paying college athletes they would not know where to draw the line. If division 1 athletes
Student athletes devote hours of time in universities all around the United States every year. They play many different sports, everything from water polo to football. It is really hard to be a college athlete for many reasons. These athletes play their respected sport multiple times a week, traveling a lot and miss many classes, which makes it much harder for them to take care of the education. The question, “Should college athletes get paid for playing their sport” is asked regularly. This has been a common argument over the last couple of years, and it seems it is here to stay. I wanted to find out what the people at Campbell think about that, so I went around campus and asked people that question. I asked 40 people, 27 said that they should get paid and on the opposite 13 people said that they should not get paid. I think that they should get paid. Athletes put their body on the line and some of them even make a huge amount of money for their schools.
As college in the U.S. gets more expensive on year to year basis, it seems to become more of need or a necessity for a student to get a good job. It almost as if colleges or the higher education system as a whole is taking advantage of students by constantly raising their tuition. At some universities there tuition has risen to nearly a quarter-million dollars for a four year education. College tuition has gone up 945 percent since 1980. It is almost impossible for the average day to day, four year college student to not come out of school without any type of debt at all. It is to the point now where the only people who do come out of college without any debt, are college athletes and the top tier of the students in their high school class,
College athletes should be paid because they bring in millions of dollars for their respected colleges every year. College athletes perform in front of millions of people. Colleges sell athletes jerseys or other merchandise of a player. College athletes put in hours upon hours of work on and off the field but they don't get anything for it. These are the reasons college athletes should be paid.
The question is should college athletes be paid to play? Many people say that college athletes should be paid; But also many say college athletes shouldn’t be paid. This subject can go both ways if you ask people. As we can see there are many ways people can view this. Athletes should be paid to play sports throughout their college years.
College sports are a big thing in America. Almost every student goes to college after high-school. In high-school most athletes play more than one sport. They play football, basketball and run track or play baseball as well. After the students get done with high-school they move over to college. College sports are way different than high-school sports. Athletes spend more time on college sports than they did on high-school sports. In College they play just one sport, not like in high-school where they play many different sports. College athletes spend about 40 hours per week on their sport and they also have to manage the academic part of college. That means college students are really busy during their season. Most of the time college athletes are there on a scholarship, which means that they don’t have to pay quite as much as normal students. So the athletes basically played sports so they don’t have to pay too much for college. Most college athletes don’t think a scholarship is enough, and therefore should be paid to play college sports because they don’t have time to work, the risks to get injured are high, it is not afforced for some students.
allowed to make a mere $1,200 to $2,500, an academic year, at a part time job
Since the species of human appearance, people realized how important function of the sport is acting for county’s development. No matter what is the east or the West, the administers pay attention to improving the citizen’s physique so that there are a great many of athletes as a variety of competitive sports were hold by country or business. Once the athletes was recognized as national sports personal, high income was accompanied at the same time.
There are various elements that demonstrate why student athletes should be paid. Interestingly, College sports play a vital role in boosting up the students to play sports, so they can expose them to a healthy life experience. Moreover, Students apply to college sports; Therefore, this helps reflect the university’s positive reputation on people, and appeal for recent high school graduates to register. Sports is where students deplete all their negative energy. In addition, college sports are a fair concept, because according to the college sports management, this position avails the pupil to discover and deepen their passion until they determine their favourite sport. Paying justice, supporting families, and longevity players are the three