preview

Analysis: Is Marriage Still A Useful Institution?

Better Essays

Is Marriage Still a Useful Institution? Our society is based on different institutions. These institutions were implemented to set rules for members of the society to be able to live together. Marriage is one of these institutions. People get engaged with one another to build a life together, but they rarely ask themselves an important question: What are the concrete impact of Quebec's rules and regulations associated with marriage on the couples that decide to get married? Why do so many people choose to be in a common-law relationship instead? This paper will explain why marriage, as a social institution, should be reformed because of the poor adequacy between the needs of today's families and the rules in place in term of commitment, …show more content…

A religious couple has to be married to have the right to have sex and, of course, children and build a family. Today, most of the population of the West is not religious and, if they are, do not consider marriage a necessary measure to be a couple and having children. In the civil counterpart, mostly in Western countries, it is widely accepted that marriage is a choice and not an obligation. However, some people are still religious and want willfully to get married. In Quebec, celebrants of religious marriage have the obligation to declare the marriage to the civil counterpart. Religious and civil marriages are however based on a different background. For example, catholic marriages are established on the fact that the marriage is eternal and cannot be dissolved. Civil marriage has a process to end it by divorce. Catholic marriage is a union between a man and a woman and the purpose of their union is to build a family. Civil union is a union between two persons, independently of their sex and they do not have any specific purpose other than the fact that the couple wants to be together and want to regulate the terms of their union by a contract that ties them together. The rules of the religious marriage are static and do not change over time, but the civil union evolves with time. It is two different matters and should be treated separately. For example, in Russia, religious marriage has no value in …show more content…

The objectives behind these rules when they were first put in place was to protect household wives, who stayed at home all her life raising the children, and ended up divorced with nothing left. Eventually, the stay-at-home wife was not able to get a well-paid job because she had never been on the employment market during her marriage. Financially, marriage is bound by rules that are very strict and people cannot opt-out easily, especially in Quebec. The family patrimony provisions specify that the belongings that are acquired during the marriage are separated between both spouses in the case of a divorce. It can be the family house, the car, RRSP, and savings. It has to be discussed before the marriage as it has an impact on the finance of both spouses during and after the marriage. Those rules are for every married couple and no one can be

Get Access