preview

Analysis Of Aristotle On The Good Life By Elliott Sober

Decent Essays

In “Aristotle on the Good life,” Elliott Sober begins the chapter by saying that there are various ethical theories that explains how people are obligated to follow several ethical principles that indicates how people should act in certain situations. Then, he introduces some ethical theories. One is called utilitarianism, which argues that whenever people act in one way and there is another way that they can achieve greater happiness, it is wrong to do that action. The second theory argues that people need to treat others morally and respectfully, which comes Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher who have a major influence on contemporary philosophy. Lastly, there is a theory that argues that people are free to act if they do not invade other …show more content…

According to him, these are not the same theories. In fact, being right does not guarantee that a person is living a good life. In that sense, Aristotle has a theory that describes how to live a good life. His theory begins by explaining what makes something good. For example, if people want to know what a good king is, they need to define is the role of a king. If a king’s role is to govern his country and make citizens happy, a good king is the king that satisfies that role. This example leads to a certain conclusion. People can decide whether something is good or not by looking at its function, and what makes it to be good depends on what that object or concept is. Therefore, Aristotle thinks that if people can find the function of human life, they can figure out what a good human life looks like. To define what the function of human life is, Aristotle explains that humans are goal-directed systems, meaning that people have goals to achieve as humans. That goals are to gain happiness, and this is the major difference between people and others such as trees and animals. Those living creatures think how they obtain food or shelter (refereed as the practical reasoning), but they do not question why are they doing so. On the other hand, people can question why they need such things like food or shelter (referred as the theoretical reasoning), and, for …show more content…

One of the reasons that I agree with Aristotle’s vision is that whenever people act something, there are purposes. For example, high school students try to get into one of the best universities in the country. University students try to get jobs that are well-paid. Those are their goals, but it is not their ultimate goals that they want to achieve for their entire lives. People are trying to achieve something to make themselves happy, and I think that this is the ultimate goal of human life, which corresponds to what Aristotle

Get Access