preview

Analysis Of Art By John Berger

Good Essays

Being of the Marxist persuasion, John Berger believed in the socialist concept of property being equally shared among the people. He points out that, historically, art has been reserved for those in power, possessing wealth and the societal position that have always allowed them to acquire and view art at their leisure. According to Berger, under this context, art is not an asset which should be adamantly concealed from the general public on account of personal circumstances. With his aforesaid statement on the lack of freedom resulting from missing history, he ultimately points out that being excluded from art, something that so beautifully reflects our human history, can be approximated to dehumanizing those who have been placed into a lower class. The incessant nature of this phenomenon is to suggest that the majority is utterly incapable of understanding and interpreting art. Moreover, it is preventive of their very attempt. In the essay, John Berger makes the following statement, "We only see what we look at. To look is an act of choice. As a result of this act, what we see is brought within our reach — though not necessarily within arm’s reach. To touch something is to situate oneself in relation to it. (Close your eyes, move round the room and notice how the faculty of touch is like a static, limited form of sight.) We never look at just one thing; we are always looking at the relation between things and ourselves." (Berger, 1972) This statement, in essence, is to

Get Access