preview

Analysis Of Bartleby The Scrivener

Good Essays

Herman Melville’s, “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” tells the tale of Bartleby, the new scrivener at a lawyer’s office on Wall-Street. In an office of industrious, distressed workers who endlessly perform mundane tasks due to the orders of the lawyer, Bartleby forms a mystifying exception. Bartleby baffles his boss and colleagues by responding to requests with his famous line, “I would prefer not to.” His response demonstrates an unwillingness to work and a willingness to do what he truly desires, which is extremely unusual to both his colleagues and their society and creates a massive social divide between them. Due to the abandonment of those around him resulting from their growing frustration with his inactivity, Bartleby ultimately faces a swift …show more content…

Individuality is essential to expressing our desires, passions, and talents to those around us, and the lives of Turkey and Nippers, two of the lawyer’s other scriveners, possess none. For example, in describing Nippers, the narrator includes he suffers from “a certain impatience of the duties of a mere copyist, an unwarrantable usurpation of strictly professional affairs.” Since the characters never express themselves, they can never begin to understand each other, a process that is essential to forming meaningful relationships. Furthermore, the lives of Turkey and Nippers, are dictated by submission to the rules and expectations of the Lawyer. Turkey even begins any questions addressing the narrator with the preface, “with submission, sir.” Working in an environment requiring one to solely follow the orders of a superior inevitably initiates dissatisfaction with one’s inability to ever voice their opinion and feel they’re a meaningful part of their community. As a result, the breakdown of the office community, or the nonexistence of community altogether, is …show more content…

Concerningly, the narrator expresses his contentment with the arrangement, stating, “Their fits relieved each other like guards. When Nippers’ was on, Turkey’s was off; and vice versa. This was a good natural arrangement under the circumstances.” Rather than seeing the arrangement as detrimental to his working community and looking to find a solution, the narrator finds their behaviors are convenient and appropriate. His acceptance of his employees mental standing emphasizes how a focus on solely economic performance robbed him of true sympathy or care for his employees. Turkey and Nippers’ are led to neglect their work because their work environment and community neglect who they truly are. The narrator tried to help Turkey by buying him a “highly respectable looking coat,” but he admits “I verily believe that buttoning himself up in so downy and blanket-like a coat had a pernicious effect upon him; upon the same principle that too much oats are bad for horses. By offering him a material item, the narrator believes he can ease Turkey’s problems. However, the action demonstrates the Narrator’s inclination to believe material gain will fix a frayed relationship instead of actually showing he cares for Turkey’s internal well-being. Healthy communities have leaders with vested interests in such well-being of those they

Get Access