preview

Analysis Of Lemony Snicket 's Series Of Unfortunate Events

Good Essays

Reader Response

I first read Lemony Snicket’s ‘Series of Unfortunate Events’ when I was 10 years old. Having little patience, I planned to just skim through but found myself immediately immersed in the story and the writing style. The author uses clever techniques to appeal to both children and older readers, which allowed me to remain engaged with the text. Snicket warns that, “if you are interested in books with happy endings, you would be better off reading some other book.” I found myself attracted to the gothic elements and darker nature of the text. I found it to be uniquely different to the traditional fairy tales with a cliché “happily ever after”. A Series of Unfortunate Events has no typical “happily ever after,” but the …show more content…

As a child, I often felt frustrated that adults would not always take me seriously. I felt empowered by the idea that perhaps I too was capable of solving my own problems as a self-reliant and independent being.

Snicket is a clever and humorous narrator. He assists the reader with more advanced words, explaining them in their given context. As a young reader, this was very educational and helpful and allowed me to further understand and enjoy the series. As an older reader, I came to realise that he did this in a comedic way. For example, Snicket writes, “It is now necessary for me to use the rather hackneyed phrase “meanwhile, back at the ranch.” The word “hackneyed” here means “used by so, so many writers that by the time Lemony Snicket uses it, it is a tiresome cliché.” Snicket also introduces children to important concepts and ideas. He notes, “your initial opinion of things may change over time,” and “the children knew, as I’m sure you know, that the worst surroundings can be tolerated if the people in them are interesting and kind.” He also addressed more serious issues, acting as a moral guide, but ensured these issues were not too overwhelming by maintaining a sense of humour. He writes, “stealing is not excusable if, for instance, you are in a museum and you decide that a certain painting would look better in your house… But if you were very very hungry, and you had no way of obtaining money, it might be excusable to grab the painting, take it

Get Access