In the text, entitled "Lifeboat Ethics," Garrett Hardin, phd, urges us to consider the hard facts of overpopulation and redistribution of wealth in a place of limited space and limited resources. He crudely divides the world, and delineates the wealthy, prosperous, affluent nations, from nations which he describes as poor, inept, and unsightly. He crowns America as the wealthiest and most prosperous nation, and uses the visual analogy to a continent being a lifeboat. Outside of Lifeboat America, Hardin explains to us in his analogy, that the countries outside of the United States are represented by the unfortunate people who are stranded, without a lifeboat, in the icy cold water. With limited space and limited resources, who shall we
Both Alfred Bester and Andre Norton make impassioned claims about the nature of American Exceptionalism, but these claims are very hard to assess objectively. Clearly the excerpt from Bester’s book comes from the Introduction, just as the excerpt from Norton’s article comes from the Conclusion. In both cases we are presented with general statements and are left to wonder if the evidence presented in the body of each work actually supports the claims being asserted.1
He explains that America is an “unrivaled global superpower” ( Rice-Oxley 163) because it distributes its culture on a massive scale compared to other countries. The American idea is spreading to other places through media, food, sports, language, and literature.
Throughout American history, idealists and materialists have changed the theme of exceptionalism. In our readings, we see the idea of american exceptionalism come to life from the writings of John Winthrop, Juan Jose Arevalo, and George W. Bush. Exceptionalism is when one depicts something, especially a nation, as unique and different from others. Winthrop expresses exceptionalism to his Puritan followers as the belief that they are special and above all others, while Arevalo, being a part of Latin America, offers an outsider’s perspective on the greed and corruption that comes with the idea of exceptionalism in the United States. Then Bush gives off the idea that America is exceptional and others were out to get
The author claims United States citizens see themselves as “special”. The author implies that Americans believe their practices and beliefs are superior to other countries. Walt then continues to comment on how Americans feel their power that originates from its intellectual, political and religious value is worthy of
Though America was established with honorable and heroic intentions, unforgivable historical events such as the American Genocide Trail of Tears have effectively portrayed America’s incapability to follow John Winthrop’s A Model of Christian Charity.
Everyone has a reason for their actions, and when humans act in ways they know to be wrong, in correct or immoral it is them conforming, bringing more or less attention to them or to a cause. In Asch’s Conformity Experiment, a group of 8 people were supposed to give answers to an obvious line length test. However one person, the test subject, was not aware that everyone else in the group was giving the wrong answers on purpose. Asch’s experiment was done on many different test subjects and showed a staggering 50% of the test subjects gave the same wrong answer as the others on more than half the trials. Another example, Milgram’s Obedience Experiment showed that when test subjects were ordered to shock another human being in order to see
Americans generally have feelings of exceptionalism from the rest of the world. This was especially prevalent during the late 19th and 20th centuries when the United States had completed its growth from coast to coast, and civilization and industry were booming. Patriotic pride is important to the growth and prosperity of a country because it provides a positive outlook on the future. Senator Albert Beveridge of Ohio declared in a speech to Congress that America was “[God’s] chosen people…to lead in the regeneration of the world” (Beveridge 1). This type of radical nationalism can lead to American imperialism simply because the American imperialists believe they have a right to colonize other nations. Rahul Varma, a Canadian playwright and essayist for the Playwrights Guild of Canada, wrote an article about the damaging effects of globalization. He writes that globalization is changing world policy and cultures into a monoculture not unlike that of the United States. The American culture, he continues, which the other unique cultures may fall victim to is one of rapid
Ok so Hardin from the lifeboat ethics his main argument was about the overpopulation and he warn others about the population dangers. For example if in a place and if there is double the population that could be a problem. How because if there is too many people then we will have to built more houses and especially get more resources since there is gonna be a lot of people that are not gonna be as far so when this happens you are gonna have to share the resources now resources could be anything but one of them is food so if there is people starving and people starving around the corner then you will probably get your food stolen or there can even be riots or people killing each other over food. So pretty much there would be chaos all around
There are laws that enforce morality, but that should not be the only thing driving a person to do what is morally right. Hit and runs are seen often, never the less a person should stop and check if the people in the other vehicle are safe because it is the right thing to do and not because a law enforces them to do so. Morals are what give reputations to people and their family. If a person has good morals they must have come from a good family. Therefore, is it a moral responsibility for Americans to give back to others?
Pushing the concept of justice, a degree higher to globalization, Rorty says Americans are more loyal to fellow Americans than to the people in Botswana, Africa. When it comes to matters affecting all, a man’s conduct will be in favor of his countrymen. An exception is the businessman who imports cheap labor from third world countries since the American labor is too costly. When faced with the accusation of disloyalty to his country, he feigns justice that necessitates fair treatment to all
Like Winthrop, Russell Conwell, author of Acres of Diamonds, stresses how great America is with emphasis that it somehow ordained from a higher power. However, Winthrop focuses maintaining this status through unselfish means while Conwell uses this as a way to establish individual success. “There never was a place on earth more adapted than the city of Philadelphia to-day, and never in the history of the world did a poor man without capital have such an opportunity . . . Because to make money honestly is to preach the gospel” (Conwell, 179). His argument that Philadelphia is the greatest city on earth ties in with the concept of American exceptionalism. The connection he makes with religion is contrasted to Winthrop since Winthrop argues that America will lose its exceptionality if it does not avoid selfish actions. Conwell argues that God is placing America in such a place that every person has the ability to acquire individual wealth. Though Conwell focuses on the city of Philadelphia, his arguments can be applied to a more general sense in America. His statement that
America’s role in the world is to advance the cause of a rising global middle class— free from oppression, free from want, free from fear. But after twelve years on the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan and after a global financial crisis and long recession that our people are still struggling to recover from it is understandable that many Americans would like to disengage from the world. Understandable, but not responsible. Because our country’s security—and our children’s prosperity—demand that we be more engaged with the world around us, not less. We do this primarily by making our nation more prosperous and secure here at home. And we do this by exercising our economic, diplomatic, military, and healing power around the world, in ways
Herzog’s masterpiece, as a critique of American society, begs some important questions. Does America really allow for prosperity or
Reed defines America as a place where the cultures of the world crisscross (Reed 66). In his article he states, “Does North America deserve
The way money is distributed within the United States is unbalanced, with the majority of the wealthy owning the bulk of the country’s wealth. Wealth can be defined as a person’s assets and monetary gains. This unequal distribution has caused numerous economic and geographical problems, such as how resources are divided among countries, how developed or industrialized a country is in relation to wealth distribution and the wide spread of disease and lack of medical attention due to an absence of money. In this paper I will address the negative and positive aspects associated with wealth distribution. I will explain how resource distribution contributes to an area’s economic growth. I will also discuss varying ways to measure wealth