Andrew Jackson Tyrant Essay

Andrew Jackson, seventh president of the United States of America, can be debated as either a good president or bad president. But if one were to weigh out the positives and negatives of Andrew Jackson’s presidency, one would realize that his positives outweigh his negatives for a variety of historic facts. Andrew Jackson was a good president because he represented the majority of America’s people by being a common, prevented a civil war when South Carolina threatened to secede from the nation, and because he technically found or instigated the two major parties used in America today (Democratic and Republican). Many Jackson oppositionists despise him because of he is a hypocrite, however America was founded on hypocrisy so as an

A tyrant is a ruler who exercises power in a harsh, cruel manner, who puts his own interests over the best interests of the general population which he governs or controls and whose authority lacks sanction of law or custom.

According to his enemies, Andrew Jackson behaved more like a dictator/king than a democratic president. Jackson and his followers became the basis of the Democratic-Republican party, later known as the Democratic party. He believed in the spoils system, supported the common man, and equality for all people regardless of their social class. Although he had such positive features, he had some negatives as well. Jackson removed Native Americans from their homeland by signing the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which created the “Trail of Tears,” vetoed the National Bank (B.U.S), and was pro-slavery. Although a common man himself, Jackson became successful as president. This was one of his biggest motives to support the common man, rather than the

Throughout Andrew Jackson’s eight years in office, many decisions he made were unsuccessful in helping our growing country continue to prosper. To this day, people still refer to him as King Andrew the First, seeing that many of his actions seemed like abuses of power. Though Jackson’s intentions had the common man in mind, the means by which he tried to please the common man, cast him as a king. Jackson’s abuse of power began when he passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. This act authorized him to negotiate land exchanges with the Natives and led to treaties that paved the way for reluctant and forcible emigration of the Indians from their native lands.

Andrew Jackson, born on March 15,1767 was the 7th president of the United States, who was a self made man, rising to money and power. He is viewed as a controversial historical figure in American history between being a hero or villain. Andrew Jackson is a villain due to his controversial decisions during his presidency, such as the spoils system, the nullification crisis, the Second Bank of the United States, and lastly the most impactful decision, the Indian Removal Policy. Jackson may have been seen as the common man leader,and did many things to benefit the people, but that can not justify his unacceptable actions.

In 1828 Andrew Jackson was elected President of the United States. The presidential election of was a victory for Andrew Jackson. Andrew’s Father died soon after his birth. He was raised by a single mother who wanted him to be a Presbyterian minister. When he was thirteen he and his brothers Hugh and Robert volunteered to fight the British. He later lost his brother Hugh to a heat stroke. He lost his brother Robert to smallpox they both got while in prison. He lost his mother at the age of 14 as well to a disease called cholera. Jackson then became an orphan. By the age of 20 Jackson became a lawyer. By the age of 21 Jackson was appointed as the district’s prosecuting attorney. He was known as a hot tempered. Andrew Jackson and the Democratic

After having the votes from the people and the Electoral College he wins against John Quincy Adams. Jackson emerged new political parties, the Whigs and the Democrats (Binkiewicz). During his presidency, Jackson had the second national bank, did not like the high tariffs but kept them, and the Indian Removal Act 1830 was passed by Congress. During this time Jackson vetoed twelve bills. One of these was the first "pocket veto" in American history. His messages were a direct link to the voters, because of the powerful language. In other ways, too, Jackson expanded the scope of presidential authority. He dominated his cabinet, forcing out members who would not execute his commands. Jackson was a matured politician and had great political philosophy. He cherished having the national debt because it meant having more credit for the country. Which is why he kept the tariff high, although he didn’t like it because it meant the debt was still there and his credit would be getting better. The tariff was greatly opposed by the southerners. South Carolina’s nullification bothered Jackson because he felt that he was not doing his job. South Carolina withdraws the nullification of the old tariff because they state that it does not apply to them therefore, they will not obey it. Jackson states that not matter what they say they have to obey it because it is federal law and they will be punished if they do not obey

Andrew Jackson was, and still is a beloved president to many people. The common person might look at our seventh president as a true war hero, when in fact Andrew Jackson was like a tyrant in many ways. He was the reason for about 7,000 Cherokees deaths, and violated many laws. The only reason Andrew Jackson was not impeached was because the senate did not provide a two thirds vote.

Andrew Jackson, the man on the twenty dollar bill, may have accomplished little achievements,during the course of his life but some of his actions were quite questionable. Depending on my own definition of successful, Andrew Jackson was a little successful but a bad president, in terms of “forcing the Cherokee off of their Georgian lands by passing the Indian Removal Act of 1830, killing the bank of the United States by preventing it from being rechartered or being successful at inspiring popular interest in politics and encouraging the participation in government of basically all white men of the day, hence inaugurating” .But then, you decide whether he was a good president or not. I'll let you be the judge of whether or not the good cancels out the bad.But let me present to you, in this article how he was a bad president by explaining the Indian Removal Acts and its injustice causing all the separations and problems that may exist today. since Andrew Jackson's presidency.

Even though Jackson was very successful during his presidency, there were some events in history that really showed his “weaknesses”. Jackson was classified as a lunatic. He was feared by many, especially his opponents. Due to his temper and poor decisions, Jackson did not mind to go to war for what he believed in or did not care to remove anyone against him. He was a real savage, and I feel the country at this time of period needed this type of mentality in the presidency. A negative event that took place during his term was the Trail of Tears, which was the forced removal of Native Americans from their homeland, resulting in the death of thousands of people. He also promoted slavery and he himself owned many and showed cruelty towards them. Andrew Jackson was stubborn and only cared about himself, but I do believe he

Andrew Jackson, whose presidential term lasted from 1829-1837, was the first president to ever be chosen by the people to lead. Because he was not born into a rich family, people felt that they could relate to him better. He too preferred supporting the common public over the wealthy aristocrats. During Jackson’s period in office he was able to shift the majority of power in the United States to farmers and small businesses in the western part of the country. Jackson vetoed many bills in order to benefit common people and also created the spoils system to balance out his cabinet. Like Jefferson, Jackson was extremely opposed to the Bank of the U.S., believing that it would only make the wealthy even

For years the president of the United States was seen as a man who was superior to the people they were leading until president Andrew Jackson changed that preconceived idea. Jackson was the first man that wanted to lead the country that provided a sense of equity with the common man, even though his impoverished background was far behind him and he was now a wealthy man, Jackson seemed to be a humble president, something America hadn’t seen. This new American vision led people to elect Jackson as a president in 1829, unfortunately overseeing his impulsive and arrogant attitude. By making questionable decisions during and before his time in office that encouraged brutality against Native Americans, and abusing his presidential power, Andrew Jackson proved to be an inadequate leader of the United States.

Born in 1767, Andrew Jackson came into a world where oppression ran through the streets by the orders of the monarchy of the time. This new world would have been in a period of discovery, and revolution as the people of the land attempted to free themselves. Jackson would grow up a stubborn child in this world, with a wild streak. His poor background contributed to a political campaign, for the people, that would span decades. As a result of his poor background and strategic campaigning, he was seen as a representative for the common folk, and lovingly referred to as “King Mob”. Yet to analyze the success of this impactful presidency, the question of whether Andrew Jackson was truly democratic, truly a representative of the people - must

Jackson’s presidency was primarily focused on the well-being of the common man. Jackson’s primary objective was to increase the economic opportunities of the common man, even if it meant in this case, destroying the lives and property of the Indians. This would soon lead to the passing of the Indian Removal Act. Although this act did destroy the lives of property of the Indians, it also helped to increase economic opportunities for normal citizens. Soon after, Jackson would also deal with the Second Bank of the United States, which helped ordinary citizens to trust the government more, as the Second Bank was very much distrusted due to its corrupt nature.

It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson had acted like a king. One reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was because he had owned slaves. Document 7, states that Andrew Jackson had slaves from 1794-mid 1830’s and became president in 1829 which means that he had owned slaves before his presidency, Andrew Jackson cannot be a hero of the common man if he owned the common man. A King will own servants and people to do work for him just as Andrew Jackson had done. A hero of the common man would not own another common man therefore President Jackson had taken action like a king .