preview

Animal Imagery In Hamlet

Good Essays

So finally it comes to this: a Shakespearean play is a spiritual experience a spatial organization ‘concerned with transcendental realities,’[ibidem] the visionary whole,” an expanded metaphor”, and those figures which the ethical critics call ‘characters’ are simply “conceptions” or “passion unveiled” or a “theme” or a “symbol”. If one looks askance in ones bewilderment and haltingly murmur that this “expanded metaphor” is cast in the mould of a drama and has characters who embodied with human sentiments which are manifested in such real human factors as greed, lust, ambition, frustration, rage, jealousy, revenge, racial hatred, religious bigotry etc., that they talk and behave like human-beings, that they have eyes, hands, organs, dimensions, …show more content…

Professor Oscar James Campbell said that through imagery Shakespeare “made his figurative language intensely an auditor’s response to particular situations and also used it to create and individualize his characters.” Bradley showed that the imagery helped to intensify certain themes (for example, the animal imagery in ‘Hamlet’ and the fire imagery in Coriolanus’) in the plays. Spurgeon demonstrated that the “Cluster” of imagery and certain “recruitment images” revealed Shakespeare’s “personality, temperament and thought,” together with the “themes and characters of the plays”. Clemen showed that through imagery, Shakespeare reveals characteristic features of his characters and the atmosphere of the play. Such study of imagery is purposeful and pertinent. But claims such as the purpose of imagery in Shakespeare is to probe the “transcendental realities, or, the imagery is inalienably related to a “developing pattern”, or, Shakespeare’s play is a poem where characters are non-existent, sound rather preposterous and make us legitimately think that the critic is “using the façade of the Cavendish to hide a convective of impressionist anarchists”. F.E. Halliday

Get Access