preview

Argument Against Christopher Columbus

Decent Essays

Children are often only taught that Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492 and discovered America. Though, only part of this is true, they aren’t taught about the awful man that Columbus was and the fact that he did not discover America. History should judge Columbus’ actions as they were. He was a cruel treasure seeker who focused only on enriching himself and would do anything to enrich and please the King and Queen. Columbus is often depicted as a hero and a great traveler. However, Columbus was simply a selfish man who’d kill to get what he wanted. “They ordered all persons fourteen years or older to collect a certain quantity of gold every three months… Indians found without a copper token had their hands cut off and bled to death”(Doc E). Meaning, if the Taino, the native people of the Americas, didn’t give Columbus what he wanted, he’d massacre them, which is an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people. Columbus would also order his men to kill the Taino. “Some Spaniards who immediately behaved like raving beasts , killing, terrorizing, afflicting, torturing, and destroying the native people… Christians have an …show more content…

As it states in Doc D, “I probably should have forbidden this exchange, but I wanted to take the cotton to Your Highnesses, and it seems to be an abundance”. Columbus is saying that he knows the trade is wrong but he’d do anything to make sure the King and Queen had the best quality goods. He also writes to them and claims, “If it pleases our Lord, I intend to at my return to carry home six of them to your Highnesses, that they may learn our language”(Doc C). He is saying that he’ll go as far as to confirm with their “Lord” to make sure it please him so he can take the best slaves to the King and Queen. Others may say that his actions were noble. However, Columbus was often known to take pleasure in his

Get Access