Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

Voluntary euthanasia is when a person make a conscious decision to end their and ask for help to use this. Euthanasia itself means an intentional termination of their life by others because the person is incurable or is in an irreversible coma. This topic became one of the most controversial topics in the world. Some argue whether voluntary euthanasia morally acceptable. However, others believe that we are playing with God since God create human alive and by taking our own life if like disrespect God.

When a patient is terminally ill or is experiencing extreme pain, often Euthanasia or Assisted Suicide can both be plausible options to end any suffering. Euthanasia is currently legalized in seven countries and parts of the United States (New Health Guide). This number is not likely to increase soon because of the high controversy, which is due to the very serious topic of this matter: a person 's life. The general process of these medical methods is usually understood as a doctor somehow deliberately causing the death of a patient or helping with their suicide. Many believe that it is unethical and violates laws, oaths, and more. Though people believe this, it is truly unethical to not give a person a choice in the manner in which they will perish.

The human body can only tolerate so much pain before it begins to shut down slowly. The elimination of suffering can allow the patient to go to Heaven peacefully instead of having a bad death that family members have to watch. Two examples of dealing of suffering is Brittney Maynard and Craig Schonegevel. Both patients had long-term illnesses and were entering the final stages. (Listverse) Brittney wanted to end her life with dignity, so she moved to Oregon, where it was legal, and died with her dignity using euthanasia to help her go peacefully. (Listverse) Craig, on the other hand, applied for euthanasia and was denied. He decided to take 12 sleeping pills and suffocate himself with plastic bags. He wanted to die listening to his favorite jams while his parents held his hands, but instead died harshly. (Listverse) He did not get the chance to die with dignity like Brittney did. Doctors have reviewed both cases and do not want patients to go to the extreme measures like suicide to end their pain. Euthanasia gives patients the opportunity to pass away in a moral and just way while taking away all the pain and

The act of deliberately ending one’s life ostensibly to relieve him/her from severely unrelenting pain and suffering is called Euthanasia. The word Euthanasia is derived from a combination Greek prefix, ‘Eu’ and ‘thanatos’ meaning good and death respectively (Humphry 1-A). According to Webster’s Dictionary, Euthanasia is the practice or an act of ending the life of a hopelessly sick or injured person and will eventually lead to his/her death. Euthanasia—commonly referred to as mercy killing draws and a lot of unending debates and unparallel controversies not only the medical doctors and the families of the affected individuals, but also from the general public, governments, policy makers and scholars alike. Euthanasia is arguably attributed with socioeconomic benefits as well as moral aspects of life. If anything, death being an inevitable natural phenomenon and every living organism, at one point or another must die.

Physician assisted suicide is “the voluntary termination of one’s own life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician” (“Medical Definition of Physician-Assisted…”). Throughout the years, assisted suicide has been a slippery slope for Americans to accept, therefore, making individuals believe this practice is murder while nations across the world have been carrying this out well before the United States planted their hands on the idea. On that account, euthanasia is only legal in six different states, while it is strictly illegal in the other 44 because of the racking up reasons individuals have implanted in their brains (“State-by-State…”). Every person has a specific outlook on mercy killing, although, physician assisted suicide is a patient's given right if they are terminally ill.

Physician-Assisted Suicide has always been a topic of great debate among individuals. Not only a contemporary issue, assisted-suicide, or euthanasia, has been practiced since the time of ancient Greeks and Romans; physicians often participated in the suicide of their patients for merciful reasons (Kopelman and De Ville 1). Euthanasia, which means “good death”, had a broader meaning than what we use it for today. According to Manning, it was “essential that death be met in a psychologically balanced state of mind, under composed circumstances, in a condition of self-control” (6). In other words, it was the manner in which one died rather than the method death was delivered that was important to the Greeks and Romans. Euthanasia did not have the negative stigma that suicide had attached to it, rather, it was advocated for by the ancients, granted that it was done for the right reasons.

Often times many people who live with terminal illnesses suffer so terribly that they become depressed. These people then decide that their pain is not worth living through anymore and turn to euthanasia. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. However there are two different types, active and passive. Active is dubbed “good death” meaning it is the most peaceful usually done by drugs. Passive (which is seen as more unethical) refers to restraint of the basic means of survival such as depriving the patient of food, dehydration, and discontinuation of medicines. The practice as a whole is illegal in most countries. Euthanasia, also called assisted suicide, is equivalent to manslaughter in the justice system and the government has dismissed any ideas to fund it. Some question if it is ethically correct to give doctors permission to end a patient’s life; but should an extremely ill person have a say on whether he or she wants to end his or her life? Although euthanasia is seen to be inhumane and

Euthanasia is “The act or practice of ending the life of a person or animal having a terminal illness or a medical condition that causes suffering perceived as incompatible with an acceptable quality of life, as by lethal injection or the suspension of certain medical treatments.” Tracing back the history of how the concept of euthanasia emerged, we are made aware of various facts. It was during the Hippocratic Era when physicians had two obligations, one was to cure and the other to kill if no cure was available. However, euthanasia was first formally legalized in 1935 in Nazi Germany. The laws of euthanasia vary from country to country, however, there are some categories of euthanasia that are extremely unethical and oppose human rights. These include involuntary euthanasia, where the person who is euthanized is able to provide informed consent, but does not, either because they do not intend to die or because they were not asked. Non-voluntary euthanasia ,on the other hand, is performed against the patient 's will, this is illegal and unacceptable around the world. The only form that allows “the practice of ending a life in a painless manner” but with the consent of the patient is via voluntary euthanasia.

In 1997, Oregon passed The Oregon Death With Dignity Act, which became the first law to permit physician-assisted suicide. Since then, six other states in the U.S. have joined Oregon. The topic debates that assisted death goes against religion and that it devalues human life. Many churches will tell people that if anyone commits suicide, that person will be condemned to hell. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) stated, “The movement to legalize euthanasia does not enhance freedom or self-determination because many of those fighting to kill themselves are depressed and need treatment or may be unduly influenced by familial, societal, or institutional pressures to end their lives. Furthermore, one cannot enhance human freedom and dignity by devaluing human life, the bishops explain” (“Euthanasia Devalues Human”). However, that’s far from the truth, people that choose assisted death have one hundred percent control of the whole process. Because most of the country doesn’t fully agree with physician-assisted death, it continues to be very controversial.

The very first time I recall learning about euthanasia was when some of my childhood pets fell ill. At ten years of age, my beloved maine-coon, Pooh Bear, was diagnosed with a rare form of cancer. My parents discussed treatment, but tried explaining to my ten year old self that the intense radiation would have only prolonged her already miserable state, and it was too costly of a bill to simply put off an inevitable death. They told me she had to be “put to sleep.” This was “putting her out of her misery.” As an animal lover and an attached, emotional child, I cried for days on end and argued that we didn’t know how she felt. This is unfair to her. One would never make such a decision for another human being. Right? My dad, being in law enforcement for twenty-something years, told me that there are such situations in the world similar to this, involving people, and I would learn this as I got older. I never realized how true this was, as

When a person commits an act of euthanasia he believes the present existence is so bad that the person would be better off dead or believes that until he intervenes and ends her life, it will progress to be so bad that she would feel better off dead. Euthanasia is the act of assisted

Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good death" and originally referred to as “intentional killing” ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis, Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed. Euthanasia is a divisive topic, and different interpretations of its meaning, depend on whether the person supports it or not. While a few societies have accepted euthanasia, there are

    America’s founding fathers declared that every person had certain inalienable rights they are born with and cannot be separated from. They listed citizens’ rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Today's government must decide if a right to life equates to a right to death.

Most adults diagnosed with cancer undergo years of treatment in attempts to cure that cancer. However, sometimes these treatments may not work, or the cancer is found too late in a patient to be stopped, and a patient’s cancer can be determined terminal, which means that the cancer can not be cured and will lead to death. If cancer is determined terminal, end-of-life care can be administered patients to control lasting pains, including shortness of breath, nausea, and constipation. However, this treatment does not cure the cancer, and will not prevent death in a terminally ill cancer patient. In some cases, patients decide that receiving end-of-life treatment is not worth it if the treatment does not prevent death. Terminally ill cancer patients may also continue to experience unbearable suffering, despite end-of-life treatments, as it is not always effective. These factors may push some terminally ill cancer patients to request to be actively euthanized. Active euthanasia is the merciful ending of a patient’s life through a single act, such as an injection. Terminally ill cancer patients should have the right to determine if they are actively euthanized. However, only patients who consider their suffering unbearable should have the right to be euthanized.

Voluntary euthanasia, or physician-assisted suicide, has been a controversial issue for many years. It usually involves ending a patient’s life early to relieve their illness. Most of the controversy stemmed from personal values like ethics or religion. The euthanasia debate puts a huge emphasis on what doctors should do for their patients and how much a person’s life is worth. Supporters of euthanasia primarily focus on cost and pain alleviation. Opponents of euthanasia tend to focus on morality. Whether euthanasia is legal or not could significantly affect future generations’ attitudes about death. Euthanasia should be legalized nationally because it helps patients that could be in unimaginable pain, offers more options for more people, and it is relatively inexpensive compared to the alternatives.