Argumentative Essay On Euthanasia

Albert Camus once quoted, “But in the end, one needs more courage to live than to kill them self.” Today I will be discussing the topic of Euthanasia also known as “assisted suicide.” The word originated from the Greeks, meaning “good death”. Euthanasia refers to the ending of one’s life, primarily to end suffering and pain. Euthanasia is a controversial topic and generates many political and religious debates. Although euthanasia is illegal in Canada, in some jurisdictions such as the Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and the American states of Washington, Oregon and Montana, euthanasia is a legal and common practice.

Euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is one of the most controversial issues in health care. Euthanasia is intentionally ending one’s life to relieve persistent pain and suffering. Dr. Kevorkian, an assisted suicide activist, was known for using unorthodox methods of terminating a life. As a result, he made headlines in 90’s. Dr. Kevorkian brought dignity to those suffering from unbearable terminal diseases by terminating their life with a lethal dose of potassium chloride. (Schencker, 2015)

In a sense, euthanasia has been one of the most controversial and debated topics to ever arise in medicine. Euthanasia is defined as the intentional, painless killing by act or omission of a dependent human being suffering from an incurable disease or irreversible coma (King, 2016). Although the practice is still illegal in many areas, it is becoming more accepted, legal, and decriminalized in many parts of the United States. In majority of cases, the termination is carried out at the person's request, but there are times when they may be too ill or not in their right mind, and it is left to close relatives to make the decision. Euthanasia directly affects autonomy, which is a patient's right to make his own decision regarding his own life (Lachman, 2010). It is also important to be able to identify the different types of euthanasia, because it is not as simple as just "terminating a life." It is much more difficult that the previous definitions leads on. It can be done in several different ways, each with their own defining characteristics, and issues can arise from every one of them. Euthanasia, also known as patient assisted suicide or "mercy killing" has many pros, cons, morality concerns, and legal issues that directly impact the future of the practice.

Euthanasia, the medical term for assisted suicide or mercy killing, is an issue still being debated almost a hundred years after a proposal to legalize it in Ohio. The medical community was in turmoil even before its legal proposition, unable to decide amongst themselves how to deal with the issue. The same arguments still rage today, though the public is more aware of the issue thanks to high-profile court cases, like the trial of Dr. Jack Kevorkian. Some claim that the terminally ill have a “right to die”, but no human life should end by unnatural means.

 "The good death." "Dying with dignity." "Assisted-suicide." Those are all terms for what doctors call euthanasia. Euthanasia is physician-assisted suicide, carried out by lethal injection or excessive barbiturates. In 1991 Jack Kevorkian assisted two women who were chronically ill to die. This was the first publicized case of euthanasia. Since then lawmakers have wondered if euthanasia should be legal in every state. Since Americans have control over every aspect of their lives, they should have control over if and when they die. If a person is terminally ill they should have the choice to die with dignity or live their death sentence. Mentally competent, terminally ill patients who have

Life, once gone is forever gone. In any case that is what is demonstrated by the evidence. Medical professionals; surgeons, nurses, and g.p’s sacrifice 4-7 years of their life studying and discovering the human body, and all the intricate and interconnecting clusters of cells, nerves, muscles and organs systems that so flawlessly, constitute it. But when the body starts to collapse and break down, when cells start to become tumorous, when muscles begin to rapture there are only so many tricks up a surgeon’s sleeve to attempt to reconcile it. It’s not a piece of cake as if they can just wave a wand or cast a spell to make the situation all better. And when the body is left irrevocably wounded it remains in a continual state of pain. And pain

Euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide,has continued to be an ongoing debate within today’s news. Euthanasia is known as the killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma. Some interpret euthanasia as the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. Many disagree with this interpretation, because it needs to include a reference to intractable suffering.

Euthanasia is defined as, "The act or practice of putting to death painlessly a person suffering from an incurable disease." Euthanasia can be traced back as far back as the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations. It was sometimes allowed in these civilizations to help others die. Voluntary euthanasia was approved in these ancient societies. Today, the practice of euthanasia causes great controversy. Both pro-life groups and right-to-die groups present arguments for their different sides. Pro-life groups make arguments and present fears against euthanasia. I contend that the case for the right to die is the stronger argument.

Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good death" and originally referred to as “intentional killing” ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis, Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed. Euthanasia is a divisive topic, and different interpretations of its meaning, depend on whether the person supports it or not. While a few societies have accepted euthanasia, there are

Opponents to the use and legalization of euthanasia have raised concerns about the morals behind the action; however, euthanasia ends a person's pain and suffering and allows them to die with dignity. According to Dr. Jack Kevorkian in 2002, “assisted suicide sets up a double standard, with suicide prevention for some and suicide assistance for others, depending on one’s health and functional abilities”. The double standard is on another ground than

The opponents of euthanasia claim that there are three main reasons for the criminalization of assisted suicide. The first reason is that some people abuse euthanasia and misuse it for their own unacceptable circumstance. Although Betty Coumbias is healthy, she requested for euthanasia because she wanted to die simultaneously with her husband who suffers from deadly disease. Here, Betty Coumbias is completely violating the purpose of euthanasia. To be specific, it isn’t right for physically or mentally normal people to ask for euthanasia and there aren’t any laws or realistic safety nets that can block these abuses. The second reason is that the patients usually draw misjudgments when they suffer physically and mentally at the moment of their decision. David William once seriously considered euthanasia because of his horrendous back pain. After recovering from the disease, he now says, “Everything was great. And then it all went wrong. Things do flash by you at that point.” The

The mind is a terrible thing to waste, stated by anti-drug commercials. We all will either appreciate or underrate our life based on certain experiences we live through. Many go through dramatic experiences that make life uncomfortable or more strenuous than surrounding patrons do. Religious beliefs often affect the reasoning of decisions and the importance of life. Some people live in a vegetable status since their body is still performing, but their mind is not. The government will not allow their death since it is unconstitutional and deemed as murder. Euthanasia ends a life and is exercised regularly overseas. The immoral act of euthanasia defies humanity and the purpose of life.

    America’s founding fathers declared that every person had certain inalienable rights they are born with and cannot be separated from. They listed citizens’ rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Today's government must decide if a right to life equates to a right to death.

Some believe that euthanasia should be ethically viewed similarly to suicide because of the idea of choosing to end one’s own life, which is considered unethical. However, some oppose this belief, and believe

Voluntary euthanasia, or physician-assisted suicide, has been a controversial issue for many years. It usually involves ending a patient’s life early to relieve their illness. Most of the controversy stemmed from personal values like ethics or religion. The euthanasia debate puts a huge emphasis on what doctors should do for their patients and how much a person’s life is worth. Supporters of euthanasia primarily focus on cost and pain alleviation. Opponents of euthanasia tend to focus on morality. Whether euthanasia is legal or not could significantly affect future generations’ attitudes about death. Euthanasia should be legalized nationally because it helps patients that could be in unimaginable pain, offers more options for more people, and it is relatively inexpensive compared to the alternatives.