Argumentative Essay On Homeopathy

The first reason for supporting alternative medicine is because it’s effective. In fact, Traditional Chinese medicine has been used for more than 5,000 years with proof of its effectiveness (Sutton, 2010, 95). In addition, TCM has punch of methods for treating patient's widely such as herbs and other (Sutton, 2010, 94-95). That means alternative medicine has proved its worth and won people’s respect.

In their research, Cohen, et al. (2001) and colleagues suggest that randomized controlled trials conducted in research settings, may not provide the whole picture about the most

For the scholarly article review, I chose “Integrating Naturopathy: Can We Move Forward?” from The Permanente Journal. The focus of the article addresses why the integrative role of naturopathy, given the growing demand from patients for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM), has yet to be well integrated into the conventional continuum of care. The article discusses the benefits naturopathic medicine delivers, various obstacles that interfere with the success of its integration, and suggests improved communication between physicians to enhance its application in the conventional care framework.

In all, we are a white paper when we born. First we learn the knowledge form someone else; after we grow up we learn the knowledge from our thinking, and it is the reason people can develop their technology again. Because people become skeptical, so we can find the truth in our world. People, who are skeptically, are not meant they are negative, but only when we have the bravery, so we can break our mind of stereotype. Even right now, homeopathy is a not approved by most people, but I believe someday we will change our thoughts, and I am looking forward to the arrival of that day.

Alternative medicine should not be funded because it is not as successful as conventional treatments. Holistic medicine is nothing more than the study of natural products in an effort to scrutinize what herbs help in a dietary way or revitalize health. When has the study of natural and dietary products become “alternative”? David Gorski an associate professor at Wayne State University argues that the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) should not be funded because the agency promotes alternative and complementary therapies in the absence of rigorous scientific evidence that they are effective. Conventional treatments become conventional treatments due to rigorous testing. Rigorous testing is required because it

earlier than I , I have to first make it recognized that i am now not a health care professional. I do nonetheless have a fascination for typical remedies and homeopathic therapies, despite the fact that i'm also not thoroughly against western treatment. I just think that if a traditional comfort can comfortably treat a distinctive disorder, then there's no motive why I must take pharmaceutical medications.

Testimony by the Homeopathic Academy of Naturopathic Physicians, HANP Testimony to Homeopathic Product Regulation: Evaluating FDA’s Regulatory Framework After a Quarter-Century Hearing, April 20-21, 2015 Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0540 Cong. (2015) (testimony of Lisa Amerine, ND, DHANP). Print.

Dr. John Ioannidis is a “meta-researcher” and “one of the world’s foremost experts on the credibility of medical research” and he proposes that the majority, upwards to ninety percent of medical research-studies are untrustworthy. The general population tends to, like Ionnadis once did, believe that everything physicians did was basically right, but his own research into the

MedlinePlus Complementary and Integrative Medicine. (CAM). NIH. U.S. National Library of Medicine. NIH. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Retrieved from www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus. and www.nlm.nih.gov. or www.nccih.nih.gov. NCCIH Pub No.: D428. (March 2009 - October

In addition, homoeopathic treatment can aid recovery in many conditions where a medical practitioner might wish to avoid the use of allopathic medicines

There have been several different studies composed to help determine the usefulness and safety of CAM practices. Some researchers are unaware of the safety of the CAM treatments and their functions. Consequently, it is difficult for people to make informed decisions about using some treatments because of the lack of consistent data. A variety of practices and systems of complementary medicine that have not been embraced by mainstream Western medicine are because of cultural, economic, social, and scientific reasons.

Health problems are based on science and theory. To resolve most chronic health problems, the practitioner must understand integrative approaches to health. Modern medicine give the practitioner the science, while alternative medical philosophies help to restore the body’s homeostasis. This is called complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).

Furnham and Smith (1988) hypothesised that this was key factor in the rise in popularity of CAM and their results supported this. Recent studies, however, have shown that those who use CAM are no more likely to distrust TM than those who do not use CAM (Betthauser et al., 2014; McFadden, Hermandez & Ito, 2010; Stokely, Cullen, Kennedy & Bardenheir 2008; Astin, 1998). This is measured by determining the extent by which participants accept TM and their trust in it (McFadden et al., 2010). However, these findings are limited as they looked at CAM generically when it is a diverse set of practises (Stokely et al, 2008). Studies that examine CAM use by its specific modalities has found relationships between distrust in TM and CAM use (Bishop, Yardley & Lewith 2016; Robinson et al., 2007; Cartwright & Torr, 2005; O’Callaghan & Jorndan, 2003). For example, Robbinson et al. (2007) found that naturopathy predicted distrust in TM, whilst chiropractic predicted trust in TM. It is interesting to note that those who use natural modalities (homeopathy, naturopathy, Chinese herbal medicine, Western herbal medicine) were more likely to report symptoms of depression and anxiety (Robinson et al., 2007). Thus, there is reason to suspect that natural modalities might appeal to those with languishing mental health and this is driven out of distrust with

In this standard report on a convention of science meeting alternative medicine in Philedalphia, Pat Rich examines the deep-set conservative values that became apparent through the "unpleasant sneering attitude" (para. 2) of the scientists. Rich delicately describes the opinions of the professionals by citing their "chortling and scoffing" (para. 1) when presented with the alternative practices such as "homeopathy, chiropractic, [and] traditional Chinese medicine" (para. 3). The reluctance and dismissal of alternative therapies by Western medicine supporters is subtly related to a sense of superiority amongst the group. Rich earnestly implores the readers to think otherwise.

13) True or False – A IRB reviews the risks and benefits of alternative therapies?