Athens has a better citizenship system than Rome because they believed that every citizens place was to vote, citizen responsibilities were important in keeping a strong government, and equal rights were granted when you became a citizen.
• Every citizen was supposed to vote, and participate in political debates.
• In Document D, it states that every citizen was to write down the name of the person that they thought were most deserving of a high political power, and to govern the democracy. After being elected, each man could only be in power for ten years, meaning that Athens had a sense of organization, and they could prevent someone from getting too much power.
• In Document A, it says that only men could become citizens. In this time
Athens is a city-state in the southern Mediterranean that has had many accomplishments but not many in terms of their citizenship. Rome is a very large, successful, fair city-state in terms of citizenship and other things and it is located in the southern Mediterranean. Citizenship in Athens and Rome: Which was the better system of citizenship? Rome has a better system of citizenship because it had fair rights, it allows more people to become citizens, and it is in a controlled and organized matter.
Athens’s democracy was created to develop a long lasting organizations with a concept in mind of individual rights for citizens. An excellent quality of the Athenian democracy was that citizens were elected annually and allowed to further a long term unless an awry situation, then an abrupt
In Rome they allow a lot of people to become citizens. Romes people included :native men, native women, native male children, and female children. In Athens they only let native men be citizens. How would athens increase if they didn't give females citizenship? In athens they didn't even consider children citizens. To be considered a citizen in Athens you had to complete education and serve two years in the military.
In Document A created by various sources there is chart that explains how to get a citizenship in Rome and Athens. The chart shows that Romans gave away citizenship more than Athens, and they had more regulations. The only people who could not obtain a citizenship in Rome were slaves and freed slaves. Whereas in Athens the only one on the chart to obtain citizenship without work or training was a, free native-born adult male, and in order to get that his parents had to be free born Athenians. Although free native-born male children could obtain citizenship they had to get a education and have 2 years of military training. The facts on the chart show that in Rome everyone, except freed slaves and slaves, mattered to a certain extinct.The extinct
Athens had a better government in my opinion. I think Athens had a better government because they created a democracy. According to the Athens and Sparta Document Set, a democracy means “rule by the people”. The Athens also got to abolish politicians they did not like. Athens also had ten generals, meanwhile, Sparta has two kings. In my opinion, I think that having ten generals is better than two kings because they understand you more. Sadly not all Ancient Athens were citizens, but if a free male would be a citizen if his father was a citizen of Athens. Later on, they changed that law, it was then bothering the father and mother had to be a citizen for the child to be considered a citizen. Sadly the women didn’t get that many rights but they soon they got more status. The Athens also made it to where not only the wealthy can engage in the jury service. In the Athens, you have to be an 18-year-old man to complete military training. On the other hand, in Sparta, you have to be a 30-year-old to complete military training. Basically, I’m trying to say that the Athens had a better
Since ; Athens was a democracy I feel that this better benefitted the citizens living their because it allowed citizens to vote for what they agreed with and what they opposed. For example in Document E it stated that there was an Athenian assembly and they had the power to pass laws, set budgets, and declare war. Whilst in Rome all of the decision making was in the hands of the Senates. All of this could not happen unless the Citizens came to vote. In Athens all forty thousand citizens were allowed to attend, however for some reason there was a shortage of citizens able attend at least six thousand have to be present to make important decisions . Voters had to make the treacherous trip to a hillside called the Pnyx near the Acroplois. Document B The Old oligarch was comparing Rome an Athens for instance it said "It is the poor man's fleet and
Women in the U.S. weren't allowed to vote until about 60 years ago, but in ancient time they became citizens all the way back in about 500 B.C.E. In ancient Rome was located in Italy and was from 743 BCE to 64 AD, and Athens was located in Greece and was from 500 BCE to 79 AD. Did Athens or Rome have a better citizenship system. Rome had a better system of citizenship for these reasons the Roman Senate cared for foreigners, had 300 men in the Senate, and served for life.
Can you believe that in ancient Rome most people could become citizens while in Athens most people could not? Around 500 BC, in the southern Mediterranean, in two ancient civilizations, Athens and Rome, the idea of citizenship started to form. The idea of citizenship gave both responsibilities and rights to people. This made them feel important and like they belonged. Rome had the better system for many reasons. Three of these reasons are that Rome was more generous with their citizenship, their government was better organized, and they were more selective about the people in their government.
One reason that the system of citizenship in Rome was better was who was able to be a citizen they considered almost every human to be a citizen except slaves. One example of this is in document A when it tells us that all men, women, and children were able to be citizens. His evidence helps explain that Rome had a stronger system because when they let more people
Why did the greatest and biggest empire (at the time) , Rome, fall? The Roman empire was full of conquered people, no one wanted to stay. Rome was full of problems but the biggest problems were foreign invaders, political assassinations, and miliary laziness, the Roman empire was bound to fall.
A roller coaster. This describes the Roman empire. On the way up, Rome was the strongest and best empire, but on the way down, it started to fall and weaken. The main reasons for the fall of Rome were the natural disasters, laziness, and foreign invaders.
The ancient civilization of Rome developed an empire using very distinct tactics. These great leaders used tactics like setting laws in place, creating a infrastructure, and creating one of the best trading systems ever to exist.
By creating a constitution, the citizens under a government are granted certain rights they would not receive otherwise. By using a Constitution, the members of a political society give authority to the government to use coercive power for the good of the entire society.
Citizenship in Rome and Athens were very different on where they stood and what should be allowed. Not only were their views quite different but so was their area and size. Comparing the two, the Roman Empire was huge and Athens was just a small greek city-state. Rome had better citizenship because of its stronger politics and intellectual thinking. The Romans social system was also better than the Athenians which allowed for more participation.
It was not just anyone who could participate in the decision making that would affect the community. In order to participate in the government in Athens you had to be a free male. Athens was a democracy and it had a legislative council (Boule). The Boule was made up of 500 councilors, with 50 men each selected from the ten tribes. The Boule would then create laws that they would present back to the popular assembly (all the free men in the ten tribes) who would vote for or against the new laws (Brand).