After getting admitted to a hospital in the past, health facilities would send a bill to the insurance company including charges for every procedure conducted on a patient and room payments. This process encouraged many hospitals to keep an individual for the longest time possible and administer as many procedures as they could to increase their earnings. Due to this reason, the health care costs increased, prompting the government to invent better payment methods with an emphasis on efficiency, hence implementing the DRG. Diagnostic related grouping (DRG) entails the process of categorizing and determining hospitalization costs by health insurance companies and Medicare. After hospitalization, Medicare pays a fixed amount to the hospital with a basis on the patients’ DRG. Therefore, if the hospital spends less than the DRG payment on a patient’s treatment, it incurs profit, while spending more on the patient 's treatment exposes it to losses (What is a DRG and How Does It Work? 2016). Therefore, prospective payment and Interim payment systems have become the primary reimbursement procedure among others. They got adopted by the Congress to reduce the federal government’s spending on health.
The PPS Approach
The main aim of PPS was to offer the most appropriate compensations for the rendered services without compromising the ability to access hospital services. Additionally, it would make the payment rates reflect new medical technologies, inflation as well as other issues
In the healthcare environment, the challenges that providers face are revenue shortfalls due to insufficient payments from the reduction of Medicare reimbursement rates (Shi and Singh, 2015. p238). Payers that have employment-based insurance are charged extra to cover the remaining balance. This process is called cost shifting. In some healthcare systems, the relationship between reimbursement reduction and cost shifting is correlated in an inversely proportional trend. As the decrease in reimbursement from public insurance such as Medicare and Medicaid, the method of cost shifting would increase.
A health insurance plan pays for medical care only after the insured has first paid $500 out of pocket on an annual basis. The $500 annual cost is called
The reimbursement method used at St. Anthony’s hospital is quite distinct depending on the party doing the payments. Payments are received from Medicare, Medicaid, private insurers and also directly from patients. The party responsible for Medicare payment is the Federal government and it offers payment mainly for the elderly. With the Medicare payment, hospitals receive a flat fee depending on the case. According to Gee (2006), most hospital revenue has declined because of the revised payment set by the Diagnosis-Related Groupings. The fee for most cases varies according to the Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) it can be classified under. For example, Medicare pays only a fixed amount for an elderly patient suffering from pneumonia regardless
Since 1984, Medicare patients have been serviced under the prospective payment system of the Medicare program. Under this system, primary care providers are reimbursed for their services using a fixed payment for each patient that is determined by the patient’s diagnosis-related group at the time of the admission. Therefore, under the prospective payment system a hospital’s reimbursement is unaffected by the actual expenditures that are required to care for a patient.
For instance, patients will receive urgent hospital care and then will not be able to pay back their bills. Another policy affecting provider reimbursements is the change from volume-based care to value-based care. For instance, the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) have mandatory reporting guidelines that all healthcare providers have to participate in. These reports were based off volume of care (fee-for service) for the past 9 years, but due to the high costs in healthcare, the CMS is changing over to a valued based care (pay-for
| Prospective Payment System (PPS) first began in 1980 with a small number of hospitals partitioned into three groups according to their budget positions---breakeven, surplus, and deficit--- prior to the imposition of DRG payment (Diagnosis- related group). The PPS as DRG’s had been designed to limit the share of hospital revenues derived from the Medicare program budget, and in spite of doubtful results in New Jersey, it was decided in 1983 to impose DRG’s on hospitals nationwide.
“The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA), signed into law September 3, 1982, mandated the development of a prospective payment methodology for Medicare reimbursement to hospitals.” http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2009/09/08/slug/. It changed Medicare reimbursement from a fee for service to prospective payment system. Which is where there`s a reimbursement method where`s there an amount of payment determined in advance of services being performed. The rates are done annually. Reimbursements for inpatient care by a classification scheme called diagnosis-related groups. If the patient might have to stay longer in inpatient care more than average days, the hospital may lose money on that patient.
Hospital reimbursement: Outline the significant components that make up the CMS IPPS (inpatient prospective payment system).
Medicare changed overtime and in 1983 adopted the Prospective Payment Plan. PPS was designed to pay a facility a lump some to provide services for a set amount of patients covered by Medicare. One of the reasons behind it was to encourage health care practitioners to proved services in a timely manner in order to shorten the rehabilitation time of an individual.
Payment-determination bases are composed of three factors: cost, fee schedule, and price related. In a cost-payment basis the provider’s cost is the main method for payment (Cleverley, 2010). It is essentially a way to formulate fees for medical services. Prior to this practice, medical cost for medical services differ from state to state, which led to a variety of fee schedules. According to Brumley (2015), the varying fee schedules were inefficient for Medicare; therefore, to solve this issue Medicare linked fees to the actual cost of providing specific services. This became a component of the Section O of Title 42 in the code of Federal regulations; which sought to describe the different costs that can be included when it comes to calculating medical fees. The goal was to structure medical fees on a more cost-reasonable basis.
Healthcare reimbursement systems within the United States are a complex structure for obtaining payment for services rendered. The healthcare system officers are required to understand the ordinary principles of the payer system. Understanding the rules, and keeping up with the continuous changes will allow the providers, physicians, and facilities to gain an advantage in this growing healthcare domain. Both private and commercial insurance companies provide a diverse menu of choices to customers. All third-party payers create interest in decreasing healthcare costs and improve control access to the not needed services. This paper will address the complexity of the healthcare reimbursement systems in the United States. Additionally, the research
In 1983, the Medicare prospective payment program was implemented which allowed hospitals to be reimbursed a set payment based on the patient’s diagnosis, or Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG), regardless of what treatment was provided or how long the patient was hospitalized (Jacob & Cherry, 2007). To keep the costs below the diagnosis related payment, hospitals had to manage efficiently the treatment provided to a client and reduce the client’s length of stay (Jacob & Cherry, 2007). Case management, or internal case management “within the walls” of the health care facilities was created to streamline costs while maintaining quality care (Jacob & Cherry, 2007).
Besides, the financial incentives for hospitals and physicians that belong to ACOs, Jaffery & Golden 2013, asked and then answered the question “why would providers join this program? One reason is to prepare for the future”. Fee-for-service reimbursement, which has been how hospitals get paid for their services rely solely on the volume of patient seen without taking into consideration the quality of care provided. Payers today, such as government, commercial insurers, employers, and individual consumers are now requesting on value -based-payment, which consist of delivering the highest level of care at a lower cost. The volume based system even though the traditional way of how payments are made is not a viable long-term option (Jaffery and Golden, 2013, p.98).
Develop payment strategies to reduce unwarranted price variation, such as reference or value pricing (e.g., analysis of price variation among network providers by procedure and service types, pilot value pricing programs,
Under payment, an ideal healthcare system will have the challenge of delivering higher quality for lower costs. The system’s payment reform will involve a transition from fee-for-service to global from systems that are value-based important for the achievement of the overall healthcare goals. An ideal healthcare payment system will give a great deal of support to value-driven system of healthcare delivery (Kent, 2013). The fee-for-service payment system will be of great importance to the healthcare system as it will help control the costs of health care.