Essay on Benefits of a Tax on High Fat Foods

Better Essays

Descartes In this essay, I will explain Descartes’ central method of doubt to investigate the truth of things, in which he wanted to be critical and generated four rules that he would use as guidance. With his method, he suspends judgment and prejudices to obtain better results. Descartes argues that despite syllogisms has truth in logic, it still has something defective, which is predominantly the multiplicity of rules. These rules might bring immorality and confusion, thus prevent him for arriving at the knowledge of things because it might bring more doubt than truth.
At the beginning of the creation of his method, Descartes looks for a method of reason that would be free of the defects of logic, however, he still sought his method …show more content…

Following this model, he develops his method based on his reason alone without the interference from others or his prejudices that could affect his reasoning. He claims that the interference of more than one person, in the creation of something causes a less perfect and less organized thing compare to things done by only one person. For instance, he exemplifies this with his education; he considers his education has a deficiency because all the sciences taught to him were from different men from different eras.
Moreover, in order for Descartes’ method to discover a great way for seeking the truth of things, he based his method on the geometrical style, which entails clarity and certainty of things. In geometry, Descartes finds the notion of clear and distinct ideas, which are considered clear and distinct because they are simple and unquestionable truths, and also they could be easy understood. In addition to it, he finds this method to be promising because he comprehends geometrical figures to be absolutely evident, not probabilistic. The fact that Descartes was looking for a method that will help him to find the truth of things encourages him to look for a method with the properties of logic, mathematics and geometry, but obviously excluding their defects. He just set out four rules rather than a large number of rules: 1) to never accept anything as true unless it is so clear and distinctly, meaning there is no minimum doubt; 2) to reduce every single complex

Get Access