Founded in 1988, the Canadian Race Relations Foundation (CRRF) was created as one of the terms of agreement in the Japanese Canadian Redress Agreement. In it, the Government of Canada and the National Association of Japanese Canadians agreed that the Japanese Canadians during and after World War II were treated unjustly and were disregarded of their human rights. The Canadian Race Relations Foundation Act was then proclaimed into law by the federal government on October 28, 1996 and the foundation formally opened in November 1997 (CRRF, About CRRF). The CRRF then is a standing promise of the Canadian federal government to “foster racial harmony and cross-cultural understanding and help to eliminate racism (CRRF, About CRRF). To achieve its …show more content…
Their Board of Directors are quite diverse in terms of race and ethnicity, in comparison to other institutions that over represent white males. Furthermore, their 150 stories initiative gives an opportunity for people whom are not normally heard in Canadian society a voice. It gives them a platform to share their story and subsequently present our similarities as human beings. The demonstration of our shared identities as human beings is quiet significant as it disrupts the program that has been installed in us, which is to focus on differences and respond to it with fear and loathing (Lorde, “Exceprt from Age, Race, Class and Sex”). Therefore, the Canadian Race Relations Foundation is a crucial step towards the advancement of equity, but falls short in its execution. The organization tends to sustain the status quo than disrupt …show more content…
Unsurprisingly, multiculturalism is glorified and Canada is painted as the “tolerant” racism-free country. Bromberg defines multiculturalism as the “coexistence of diverse culture and acceptance of cultural differences” (13). The Canadian Race Relations Foundation’s glorification of multiculturalism erases the plethora of systems of oppression that racialized bodies and Indigenous people face in Canada. Bromberg associates multiculturalism for Canada’s high rank in “inter-ethnic trust and friendship, comfort with ethnic diversity…and low levels of support for anti-immigrant political parties or movement” (14). This is obviously a stretch as illustrated by the media representation of black people and Aboriginals, particularly in Toronto. In the Muzik nightclub shooting after the OVO Fest on August 2015, 2 people were shot: one was a girl named Ariela Navarro-Fenoy, who was portrayed as the “beautiful, smiling girl,” and the other was Duvel Hibbert, a black man whose death highlighted his past crimes rather than being a victim of a shooting (Matis, “Collateral Damage”). Media coverage of gun violence have been under scrutiny by lawyers, criminologists and media critics as it sustains the stereotype that Black people, specifically Jamaicans, are violent gang members that are a threat to the streets of Toronto (Matis, “Collateral Damage”). This glorified
When things have commenced are they able to come to a halt? Many people in this world wonder
Aboriginal persons in Canada have been facing oppression ever since colonization began. Even when Canada gained independence from the British Empire, the oppression continued and still goes on today. One major contributing factor to the oppression of Aboriginal people in Canada is the actions taken by the Government. The Government of Canada has in fact mistreated and found to be partaking in wrongdoing when dealing with the Aboriginal population in this country. With this ugly truth being revealed, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission had to be tasked with discovering and revealing past wrongdoing by a government in the hope of resolving conflict left over from the past. (cite)
In March of 2012, a white power rally in Edmonton drew out a dozen or two members of the Blood and Honour racist group. They were met and peaceably challenged by hundreds of participants in an anti-racism rally, which was "coincidental" (Dykstra). Therefore Canada still does have lurking racism, but in its overt forms it is socially unacceptable. This paper will address the overt forms of racism evident in Canada, which include hate groups like Blood and Honour. However, it is the covert forms of racism and bias that threaten to undermine the social fabric of Canada.
How often do we stop to think about the minorities of this country and how they become involved and are treated in the criminal justice system? I surmise; only some of us will concern ourselves with such details. For some like myself; we might work with individuals of the Aboriginal community or have interacted with members of this group whether through school or work. Canada “had an Aboriginal identity in 2011 of 4 % or 1.4 million people” (Kelly-Scott and Smith, 2015). Of this total there is a gross overrepresentation of Aboriginal people in Canada’s Criminal Justice System. This overrepresentation of Aboriginals in the CJS comes as a result of socio economic factors, sentencing reforms, systemic discrimination, education and employment and victimization of Aboriginal women. In partial fulfilment of this course, this paper will address the leading factors which has led to the overrepresentation of this group in the CJS.
Discrimination towards ethnic minority continues to find its way in our country. Unfortunately, the subject of racial profiling remains a part of Canada, as officers ignore individual behavior and instead, rely on race in police investigations. According to Katheryn Russell (as cited by Amy Hackney & Jack Glaser, 2013) racial profiling is defined as “The use of race or ethnicity by law enforcement officials as a basis for judgement of criminal suspicion” (Russell, 1998). Racial profiling within our country can be exposed through Canadian history, surveys and interviews from those treated unjustly. All of which stakeholders attempt to remedy for the victimization of the innocent.
This paper will explore the act of racial profiling and the constitutional rights it infringes upon, as that leads to a number of psychological and social damages within Canadian society. Today public and police encounters can be harmful and stressful events that are largely experienced by minority groups. As a multicultural nation, Canada is supposed to preserve its core values, such as freedom from discrimination, but this is not always the case. According to The Racial Profiling Debate In Canada, “In the criminological literature, racial profiling is said to exist when the members of certain racial or ethnic groups become
In the eyes of many Canadians our country is viewed as a historically racially-inclusive society. This idea is false, and there is very limited evidence to support the contrary. Many events in Canada’s history have shows that it is guilty of promoting racial hierarchies and cultural insensitivities. Throughout Canada’s development there has always remained an emphasis on promoting the supremacy of the white race, and Anglo-Canadian culture.
In this paper the role of the HCPs, in regards to not providing ethically safe care to AP will be explored. As the literature was reviewed there were many themes that came to the surface. For the purpose of this paper I will discuss the three themes, which I found throughout the literature which give a bit of historical context as to why HCPs may have an implicit bias towards AP, the emotional burden it puts on AP, and its impact on health within this population.
A few years ago in Smalltown, CA a burning cross was placed in the lawn of a visible minority family. Although the media seemed shocked at this explicit racial attack and portrayed the attackers as a group of abnormal, twisted deviants, I was not surprised. As an Asian student who is writing her Sociology honours thesis on visible minorities in Canada, I know on a personal and academic level that racism in Canada does exist. Although explicit racial incidents are not a common occurrence, they do happen. Here at school, a visible minority student left the school when a car sped past her, while the young men inside shouted racial slurs. Two weeks ago The school paper published an article about a group of
Many theorists lay blame for the perpetuation of racism in Canadian society on the mainstream news media, arguing that racist preconceptions are reflected and reinforced through the use of
Many will agree that the root of the horrendous conducts stipulated in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Report is an old classical racism; but has this classical racism vanished or just done a cosmetic face lift over time? It would be naïve to think that the report in question had any impact on the basis of racism in Canada. Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada may have opened some eyes, but correspondingly, has not and cannot eradicated the source of racism, so as to stop racist based injustices from reoccurring. The probability of repeating such racism stipulated in TRC report looks feeble in today’s Canada, nonetheless a kind of modern racism which is complicated, hard to penalize, and is multi-dimensional, that has developed in the recent years, and needs to be addressed, exists. As defined contemporary racism is the
Racial discrimination in the workplace has been a persistent theme in Canada’s history as well as present-day times. The occurrence of actions and attitudes that impose a sense of one being less equal than another on the basis of one’s race in Canada’s workplace inhibits both our nation’s ability to move forward as well as strengthen unification within our country. The belief in a more egalitarian society, where one’s race and ethnic background have little to no impact on employees (or potential employees) standings within the job market, would seemingly be reinforced by the majority of Canadians, who consistently show support for Canada’s multicultural identity. Couple that with the noticeable strides Canada has made in the past several
Canada is routinely defined as the exemplar multicultural society with the most diverse cities in the world such as Vancouver, Toronto and Quebec. The concepts of integrity and complexity are being shaped in Canadian society because of its co-existence of different cultures. Indeed, multiculturalism has been a keystone of Canadian policy for over 40 years with the aim of pursuing Canadian unity (Flegel 2002). Accordingly, Canada is generally estimated a country where people are all equal and where they can share fundamental values based upon freedom. Diversity is sustained and promoted by governmental policy, however, there are still racist interactions, which are destructive to minorities integration, especially recent ethnic groups’ arrival (Banting & Kymlicka 2010). This paper will examine challenges that multiculturalism has brought society and residents of Canada.
The role of Critical Race Theory provides us with the idea of “racial realism”, the idea that racism, the normalcy of white supremacy is part of the everyday life of an ‘other’, in other words, racial or indigenous minorities in Canada. Consequently, the Critical Race Theory gives an understanding of the power that can be given to a definition such as ‘race’, and how heavily influence the way society functions and sparked in a cultural divide in Canada due to the simple idea that biological and aesthetic difference. The Critical Race Theory gives us the understanding of how common it is for an individual, but most dominantly, a person who is Caucasian or who has light complexion can easily identifies with their ‘race’, and view a person of another colored complexion as an ‘other’ because this normalized.
A country built on immigration, Canada has long had a reputation of being culturally and ethnically diverse. While multiculturalism is meant to be built on equality and appreciation of different cultures, its concept has gained both support and opposition. On one hand, it allows for more assortment and the voices of minorities have a higher chance to be heard. On the other hand, loss of unity and conflicts may occur due to contrasting worldviews of the citizens. All in all, multiculturalism is a controversial policy that has both advantages and disadvantages, but has proven to be a successful strategy in Canada.