CM normally meets with the client every Wednesday for a face to face meeting. Client reported this week she was unable to meet for face to face because she was scheduled to work. On 3/24/2016, CM met with the client to complete Bi-Weekly ILP Review. In the meeting client was dressed with proper attire for the weather. She was cooperative and friendly in the meeting. SOCIAL SUPPORT UPDATE: Client reported during the day if she is not scheduled for work she will leave the shelter during the day to visit her sister. She continues to report she gets along well with most residents but bed no E-2 is a troublemaker and to avoid any trouble she will go visit her sister. RESOURCE UPDATE: Client report she has an active PA case. Food Stamps $182.00 …show more content…
Client mentioned she is going back to Center 37 to reapply for Linc V certificate. CM provided client with a Residency Letter and Linc application form. Client also reported she is diligently searching for low income apartment with her sister and she filled out housing application with Linden Plaza and Spring Creek Garden. REVIEW ILP AND CLIENT REIGHTS AND C LIENT CODE OF CONDUCT VIOLATION: CM reiterate the shelter rule and regulation and for the client to adhere 10pm curfew. CM also advises the client if she has any issues or concern to see administration. WORKER ASSESSMENT OF CURRENT SITUATION: client continues to show the ability to identify and complete goals in a timely fashion. She is capable of living independent or in a SRO. Plan of action: Client must adhere to the 10pm curfew and to DHS Rules and Regulation. Client must participate in all scheduled meetings. Client must attend to all on-site and off-site medical appointments and provide medical documentations. Client must adhere to the saving contract. Client must provide updated information concerning her legal issue. CM reviewed the Bi-Weekly ILP. Client agreed and signed. Next Meeting is scheduled for
On Tuesday March 8th, 2016 Case Conference with Resident Ebony Rice #325 has been conducted with Janette Chirico from DHS , Program Director Felicita Rivera, Housing Program Supervisor Zenobia Garland and Senior Case Manager Ms. Arias. The purpose of this meeting was to address client noncompliance and to come with an exit strategy for this Ms. Rice. Client was asked the reason for her missing ILP meetings and her barrier to obtain permanent housing. Client has a LINCH voucher for the amount of $1515. Client stated that she hasn’t receives any help from facility staff so she is searching for apartment on her own. Ms. Rice has been receiving assistance by the onsite housing department but unfortunately she has been able to link to an apartment
Social Services: On 12/08/2016, client Lissy Figueroa met with assigned Case Manager Ms. Gilgen for Intake Assessment and Initial Independent Living Plan (ILP). Client is 21 years Hispanic female. Client has a 3 year old son named Maxwell. Case Manager asked client how and why she became homeless. Client stated that she was
At 0824 this clinician met with the patient who reports her weekend was not unpleasant. She reports she is continuing to have problems locating housing. She reports her family members continue to refuse to allow her to live with them specifically her father and her uncle. She reports she has one friend who is considering allotting her the capability to reside with her under the condition that she speak with her Child Protective Services (CPS) caseworker first. She reports she does not want to reside in a homeless shelter with her son as she has done this before and the experience was not up to her standards.
Client reported to CM she has a new granddaughter and tomorrow she will be spending the day with her. Client report no community support. CM enrolled the client to Adult Recreation Center.
I: CM guided client through ISP goals. CM inquired about updates related to the client’s housing goals. CM used open ended questions to inquired about the client most recent drug use. CM reminded client that starting Monday the 2nd he would have to meet with CCM for weekly case management going forward. CM continued to assess for PTSD symptoms, substance abuse, and medication compliance.
CM was out on vacation for the period of 8/15/2015 to 8/24/2015. On 9/1/2015, CM met with the client to complete Bi-Weekly ILP Review. Client arrived early for the meeting. She was alert, satisfactorily groomed, and casually dressed. She was cooperative and appropriate in the meeting. She made eye contact appropriately. The client described her mood as “good” Her affect was in appropriate. She doesn’t appear to be in distress. CM inquires how the client has been doing since the last Bi-Weekly ILP Review. Client replies “ she is good”. She continues to relate she doesn’t make anyone aggravate her. She also mentioned lately one of her male friend graph hole of her cell number, and he calls her every day. CM inquires how it got hold of her cell# client replies “she doesn’t know”. CM advised the client if he continues to harass her two things she can do: One file a police complain or change her cell number.
Meeting is arranged for Tuesday, September 20, 2016. Client continues to report not even her coordinator she gave him a copy of her psychosocial and psychiatric evaluation. She also mentions that her coordinator is requesting for client to be removed from his
Housing: Case Manager confirmed and verified that Ms. Williams has been attending housing meetings and that she has been submitting her weekly housing search logs. Ms. Williams has a City FEPS Voucher. Ms. Williams was escort it to go view an apartment by her assigned Housing Specialist and application was submitted. Case Manager encouraged to
On 7/11/2015, CM met with the client for Bi-Weekly ILP Review. Client arrived early for the meeting. In the meeting client appears to be well groomed with good hygiene and dressed appropriately for her age. She was calm, cooperative and well related. She discussed typical issues re: her political and activism work and automobile accident disbursement. She continues to relate her paralegal was in the neighborhood and she wanted this worker to meet her. Unfortunately, there was no parking and she left. She also mentioned the paralegal brought her documents that she need to filed with the state and the federal for her automobile entitlement.
Rules, Regulations, and Curfew: Ms. Hair was reminded of the facility’s curfew, rules, and Regulations. Case Manager asked Ms. Hair if she was aware that she has violated curfew several times since her last ILP meetings. Ms. Hair stated that she was aware. Ms. Hair was reminded that during intake she was informed that violating curfew is considered non-compliance. Ms. Hair stated that she was aware. Ms. Hair stated that the reason that she has violated curfew was due to her work schedule; however Ms. Hair has failed to submit proof of her work scheduled.
Client curfew violated numerous times. CM inquires where the client goes when she CV’D. Client reported for the weeks that she CV’D her uncle was hospitalized, and that the reason why she will come to the shelter after 10pm, missing her curfew. CM reiterates the shelter rule and regulations and for the client to adhere to the
Client Rights and Client Code of Conduct Violations & Facility Rules Violations: Client continues to be compliant with the shelter rules and
Williams the facility’s health and safety rules. Case Manager also reminded Ms. Williams that all children under the age of 2 are expected to sleep in their assigned crib. Ms. Williams stated that she was aware. Case Manager also reminded Ms. Williams that she is expected to continue maintaining her unit clean and organized. Ms. Williams was reminded that she is expected to respond all conducted fire drills. Ms. Williams was reminded that if she failed to comply with any health and safety rules she would be considered as non-compliance and a warning for non-compliance will be issued. Ms. Williams stated that she was aware. Ms. Williams maintains a clean and organized
I-CM informed the client that he had contacted and left a message with LA Family Housing the week prior, but no one answered due to the Thanksgiving holiday. CM contacted LA Family Housing again with the client present, but on one answered and a voice message was left. CM continued to assess client’s mental health and medication compliance. CM inquired what outside activities the client has been engaging in. CM inquired about client’s plans for Thanksgiving.
Client continues to report she wants to be transferred to another shelter, because she mistrusts staff and residents, there is no structure in the room and residents and staff are very inconsiderate towards her. She also states that worker are hacking her email account and also stealing things from her locker.