CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) is an international environmental agreements or treaty between 171 nations in 1975 that is aimed at ensuring that global wildlife trade is managed responsibly and sustainably. This was done because trade in wildlife was estimated to be worth billions of dollars every year. The purpose of CITES was also to ensure that international trade does not threaten the survival of different species. This convention establishes international cooperation of certain species from over exploitation through international trade, this is to say the main concern of CITES is conservation of species (Fiadjoe, Y. 2014).
CITES member states and the involved no governmental organisations represents attitudes towards wildlife either political, ethical and cultural differences that have
…show more content…
The success and progress of CITES is determined by the number of animals listed on the appendices, member states, proposals submitted and the permits …show more content…
These reports were then taken to CITES and the media on mass and gruesome killing of elephants. These elephants are also threatened by increased loos of their habitat and loss of range due to rapid human population growth and agricultural developments. There CITES member states are doing all they could to reduce the killing of such species so that they may be useful to the future generation. It is stated clearly that African elephants compete with people in Botswana for protected areas to ensure survival of elephants, because in many areas of Botswana people and animals depend on the same resources and space, therefore resulting in conflicts among the
All Saints is a member of the CITES management authority (Convention of International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora) who require strict adherence to record keeping.
Textual Evidence: “Elephants are also losing their habitats—and ancient migratory routes—due to expanding human settlements, plantation development and the construction of infrastructure such as roads, canals and pipelines.”
Elephant populations suffered a drop in numbers that carried the species into the endangered animals list. At the beginning of the twentieth century, about ten million elephants lived in Africa. Presently, the ten million is reduced to half a million because of illegal hunting and habitat loss. Studies of the population show twenty-two thousand were killed in 2012 and twenty-five thousand in 2011. When comparing the death rate to the natural population growth, there is a possibility the largest mammal on Earth could be extinct soon (Vaughan 1). Because the elephant is the largest animal to walk on land, the greatly increasing human population affects the elephant population first. They live in some regions of the world that have the densest human population which continues to grow, which therefore continuously decreases their own population (Bryner 1). As the human population swiftly increases, the elephant population in turn, decreases. This is so because they cannot cohabitate the same living space. Elephants and humans cannot cohabitate because they would kill each other due to the inability to communicate. About population recovery, the Animal wildlife foundation states, “Populations of elephants- especially in Southern and Eastern Africa- that once showed promising signs of recovery could be at risk due to the recent surge in poaching for the illegal ivory trade”(1). Poaching presents one of the main issues that make recovery so difficult for these animals.
Hunters, activist or conservationists have a common goal “ensure that endangered species are here for generations to come” . Some comments that conservation trough commerce is a worthy way to manage natural resources and create awareness of endangered species. Hunters are more likely to be interested in support charities in order to prevent endangered animals to become extinct.
Because of the poaching of game like the elephant, the number of species will start to diminish. What hunters brought to the villages of Botswana was the money and the meat from the animals to feed the many people that go hungry everyday. Hunters that would take animals such as an elephant wouldn’t take any of the meat for themselves but rather they give all of the meat to the villages in the area. However, when poaching starts to take over, there will be zero meat or money that will be put back into the community. Poachers that kill elephants are only after one thing and that is the ivory from the elephant tusks. After taking the tusks, the elephant is left to rot. Another animal that is sought after by poachers in Botswana is the rhino. The rhino is poached for their horns, which are supposedly an aphrodisiac in China so the demand is high. Because of these effects, groups like SCI are so important to different places around the world. The money brought in by the hunters is used to hire conservation officers to protect the rhinos and elephants and to buy land that will be put into game preserves so the numbers of these species will increase because there aren’t any pressures from hunting or
Nature culture dichotomy is a Western world view so it is appropriate to consider using this analytical approach when discussing the issues associated with the re-introduction of the Mexican wolf to other stakeholders because of the areas where they would be re-introduced. The area is important because the people in these areas will have many of the same thoughts on how they view the re-introduction
The National Wildlife Institute has published “Conservation Under the Endangered Species Act: A Promise Broken”. Their critique of the Act includes questioning the programs undertaken as a result of the Act have played sufficient roles in the recovery of species that were delisted, as well as questioning the allocation of funding to programs intended to aid listed species.
Because of the sale of illegal ivory so many elephants' lives are put at risk. If the poaching of elephants and ever-growing trade in illegal ivory is to be seriously addressed, part of the solution to this complex problem must be a return to the full ban on the sale of ivory established in 1989 (Bloody Ivory). Between 434,000 and 684,000 African savanna elephants in 18 countries remain, down 30% in the last seven years. Once again levels of poaching and illegal trade have spiraled out of control. Rates of poaching are now the worst they have been since 1989. There are no easy answers, but a total ivory trade ban is the one strategy we know has worked (Mary Rice). Hong Kong seized 779 elephant tusks three days into 2013, over a ton of ivory,
Founded by Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld (among others) in 1961, the WWF focuses on preserving forests, marine, freshwater, wildlife, food and climate that are threatened by the growing technosphere. Through donations, hands-on work, and political action, their 5 million member army of preservationists has amassed an endless list of accomplishments. Financially, this group has invested over 1$ billion in more than 12,000 conservation initiatives since 1995, and in terms of hands-on work, the WWF has helped to bring many species back from the brink of extinction, including the black rhinoceros, southern white rhinoceros, greater one-horned asian rhinoceros, gray whale, african savannah elephant, mountain gorilla, saiga (antelope), and others. Further in terms of political action, the WWF has engaged in countless court activities to protect the environment since 1961. In fact, “following several years of advocacy by WWF and others, 18 governments signed the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, which remains the world’s only international environmental treaty for a single biome (WWF, 50 Years of Achievement).”
Elephants have been victims of not just the incessant poaching but also of the civil wars; ultimately making them to fight back. The killing case have gone over the roof, as the “singular perversity” (Siebert 353) of the attacks. In India, “nearly one thousand people have been killed by elephants between 2000 and 2004” (Siebert 353). Several frequent attacks were recorded in Africa and other villages where the denizens were forced to evacuate their houses. ‘nearly one thousand’ which accentuates the gravity of the situation in 4 years had gained a lot of attention from the elephants researchers. Seibert’s prime third perspective, Gay Bradshaw, Oregon State psychologist, claims that that “everybody pretty much agrees that the relationship between elephants and people has dramatically changed” (Siebert 353). The choice of diction ‘dramatically’ indicates that elephants are not being violent towards human beings but they are also doing it intentionally. Dramatic behavior changes over the years are now being explained in the elephants. “Bradshaw and several colleagues argued that today’s elephant populations are suffering from a form of chronic stress, a kind of species-wide trauma” (Siebert 354), due to “decades of poaching and habitat loss” (Siebert 354). Elephants are becoming more destructive and Bradshaw looked into combining “traditional research into elephant behavior with insights about trauma drawn from
If Illegal poaching keeps killing Elpehants at the rate thats is going expeerts predict that within the next decade elephants will be an extinct species .
There are certain animals that are not protected by any general EU treaties, rules, controls or laws; hence they are excluded from the scope of protection of EU law.
Just imagine life without any elephants, wiped out just like the dinosaurs. In the early 1980’s, there were more than a million reported elephants in Africa. Tragically, during that decade, 600,000 elephants were destroyed for ivory products. Today, conceivably no more than 400,000 elephants remain across the continent. Elephants are facing a very real threat of extinction; In fact, the African elephants are listed on the
Simultaneously, thousands of other species across the globe face the same threat: extinction. Biodiversity is an essential part of our world, our global ecosystem. As Planet Earth?s resources diminish and its creatures vanish, those who recognize the need to preserve what is disappearing look to international politics to accomplish what individuals cannot. The most important instrument for implementation of international policy has been the Convention On International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), which went into effect in 1975.
“(i) Assisting in achieving the conservation and survival of species must be the aim of all members of the profession. Any actions taken in relation to an individual animal, e.g. euthanasia or