Central Venous Catheters Case Studies

4) Significance: This research shows that there is a gap in the evidence, but that the primary concern for nursing staff is to ensure that catheters are removed as soon as it is possible to do so.

The nurse driven protocol was tested in 4 intensive care units. It included evidence-based orders for discontinuing, handling, and properly managing the catheters. One of the most important factors was the removal of the catheters in a timely manner. The data pre

Lewis et al. explain in Medical-Surgical Nursing, a central line is a catheter placed into a large blood vessel for a patient who requires frequent or long-term access to the vascular system. The authors explain that catheters are used for the administration of high volume fluids, medications that are irritating (such as chemotherapy), long term pain medication, blood products, parenteral nutrition, and hemodialysis. Kaiser policy states four different types of central line used for patients: Centrally inserted catheters, peripherally inserted catheters, injection implanted ports and hemodialysis catheters. Centrally inserted catheters

Article by Clancy (2009) explained central lines were a result of an estimated 250,000 blood stream infections and accounted for 30,000 to 62,000 patient deaths, then adding that each infection cost upwards of $36,000 and cumulatively add up to at least $9 billion in preventable costs annually. The article also explains how the mindset has changed from the cost of having a central line in place and expecting complications to lowering infection rates by an intentional interventional process/s. The article speaks of 5 basic steps to reduce CLABSI, hand washing, insertion techniques, skin cleansing, avoidance of certain sites and earlier removal of the CVC. Studies showed that these guidelines were only followed 62% of the time. The system was changed to ascertain that all the clinicians were in compliance. This prompted 5 interventions, education, a CVC insertion cart with all necessary equipment, physicians having to validate central line necessity, a concise checklist for bedside clinicians and the empower of nurses to stop procedures if guidelines were not followed. These low cost interventions from 11.3/1000 in catheter days in 1998 to zero in the fourth quarter of 2002.

Focus on enhancing quality of care has exaggerated on a nationwide scale. Decreasing preventable damages within the health care settings is being on focus furthermore. From this there has been an immediate connection between repayment to quality through pay-for-reporting and pay-for-execution programs. Around 25% of the hospitalized patients have an indwelling catheter in place (Saint, Kowalski, Forman et al., 2008) and there is a 3% to 7% has the probability to get urinary tract infections in such cases. The infection could cause the signs of bladder distress, trouble in urination, and high temperature in such patients. Analysis shows that 48% of patient who has indwelling catheter complains of pain from the catheter, 42 % experience inconvenience from the catheter and 61% found that their daily activities are exceptionally constrained by these catheters (Saint, Lipsky, Baker, McDonald, & Ossenkop, 1999). Urinary tract infections may prompt bacteremia (infection

Central line bundle is a group of evidence-based practice strategy for patient with central catheters, when implemented together, produce better outcomes than implemented individually (Institute of health care improvement, 2010.). The main elements of central line bundle are hand hygiene, maximal barrier precaution upon insertion, Chlorhexidine skin antisepsis, optimal catheter selection, and daily review of line necessity with prompt removal of unnecessary lines Aseptic technique when using and caring for a central line catheter can decrease the chance of contamination in this critically ill infants. Staff education on adherence to aseptic technique and strict central line care guidelines are essential to decreasing bloodstream infections.

PICCs lines have become well recognized as reliable central venous access devices (VADs), with lower potential for complications than short-term central venous catheters. PICCs first gained popularity in the 1980s, and their use has grown steadily since then. They were initially popular in many parts of the United States due to the need for venous access in home care patients. They have grown in popularity because of their reduction in potential complications and costs compared with short-term central venous catheters, and because PICCs can be inserted by registered nurses who have been trained in the procedure.

Identifying what factors contribute to occlusion are background questions (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015) that should be addressed to ensure the foreground question is appropriately answered. Medication administration, fibrin sheath formation, duration, and frequency of use can each contribute to clot formation (Gabriel, 2011). If a patient is scheduled to receive a specific medication over a duration of time, it is imperative that the central venous catheter is patent and available for continuous use. Encouraging patient compliance will assist with ensuring that duration and catheter access doesn’t increase the risk of clot

Staff nurses on the unit expressed their frustration with the current practice regarding the frequency of PIV catheter replacements, stating that it was “time-consuming” and contributed to “patient dissatisfaction.” The process of replacing a PIV can often be time consuming and may take multiple attempts in order to successfully insert a new PIV. Research supports a change in practice that address these concerns. A pilot study performed in 2012, by Rickard, Webster, Wallis, Marsh, McGrail, French and Whitby indicated that replacing PIV catheters only when clinically indicated did not lead to catheter-related complications, as previously

Upon completion of this project I learned that many times patients were unaware of the compilations such as infection that may occur with central lines. This has taught me the importance of proving education to our patients in addition to staff members. Patients can help decrease central line associated blood stream infections by being aware of their surroundings and ensuring that nurses, physicians, and visitors take proper steps in decreasing infections rate. Implementing a policy to place alcohol infused caps on all central line that are not currently infusing is best practice back by evidence based practice to significantly decrease infection rates. This project as helped me identify evidence based practice and incorporate these practice in our daily care to help improve patient outcomes. The first couple of days there was not any patients within the intensive care unit with central line.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) can be used for routine patient care for treatment and have been increasingly used over the past years. They are more invasive than a peripheral intravenous line (PIV); however, they can be inserted at the bedside, are easily removed, and provide many positive benefits. PICCs relieve patients from frequent venipuncture for serial lab draws, decreases frequent re-starts of PIVs, and the patient can be discharged home, if needed, for continued IV therapy. Although there are benefits to these easily inserted central lines, central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are a possibility (Dumont & Nessselrodt, 2012).

Peripheral IV catheterization is a painful and potentially anxiety-provoking procedure for the patients. The interventions to reduce the pain caused by venipuncture were explored in the past decades (Oman, 2014). The majority of the studies reviewed in this summary included one level 1 evidence of meta-analyses (Oman, 2014), three level 2 evidences of randomized controlled trials (Beck, 2011; Deguzman, 2012; Kahre, 2011) and one level 3 evidence of controlled trials without randomization (Levitt , 2013). Many studies have demonstrated that 1% lidocaine intradermal injection before IV insertion can reduce the pain significantly (Oman, 2014). Kahre and his colleagues’ study indicated bacteriostatic normal saline (BNS) group had lower pain score

The hospital’s current practice for CAUTI prevention includes the use of the HOUDINI protocol. This protocol features the acronym for the strict indications required for the insertion and the continued use of the urinary catheter (hematuria, obstruction, urologic surgery, decubitus ulcer, intake and output, no code/comfort care, and immobilization). The physician places the original order for the catheter with HOUDINI protocol and chooses the indication that applies. The order empowers the nurse to assess the patient daily for the continued indications and to remove any urinary catheter that no longer meets the indications. Hospital wide the protocol has been successful at decreasing CAUTI rates, however the target for CAUTI rates is 0 and our current rate is 1.37 per 1000 catheter days. Intensive care units have higher urinary catheter usage than in medical surgical or telemetry units (Halm, O’Conner, 2014). In MICU the most common indication for a urinary catheter is the need for accurate intake and output on patients with hemodynamic instability. Staff nurses are required to assess the patient daily and readdress the continued indications. In the past month no urinary catheters were removed

A peripherally inserted central catheter or PICC line “is a thin soft flexible tube” (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC). (2015). It is usually inserted in the upper arm just above the elbow in a main vein that will lead to the heart where the blood flows more rapidly. Midlines are inserted usually into the vein in the arm. Sometimes you will need to use a leg vein when caring for infants. They last longer than a regular IV, but not as long as a PICC line. “It can usually be used for 2-4 weeks” (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC). (2015). The central venous catheter is “placed into a large vein leading into the heart and comes out through a small opening in the chest area” (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC). (2015). which they call the exit site. The big

The use of intravenous therapy in the hospitals is now considered a routine therapy. In 2016, DeVries and Valentine stated that 70% to 80% of hospital patients have peripheral intravenous lines at some time during their stay. A peripheral intravenous (PIV) line is a small hollow tube (catheter) that is inserted into a vein and can be connected to special tubing. PIV line is commonly used to administer medications or fluids directly into the vein. The article “Intravenous Therapy: A Review of Complications and Economic Considerations of Peripheral Access,” states that the history of intravenous (IV) therapy dates back to the Middle Ages. Dr. Thomas Latta pioneered the use of IV saline infusion during the cholera epidemic and in the 20th century, two world wars established a role for IV therapy as routine medical practice (Dychter, Gold, Carson, & Haller, 2012).