Sharon is also called Rosashara, she is a married, teenage daughter of senior Joads. Sharon’s husband leaves her and then this have-not bears a stillborn baby because of the hardships she endures. As the story ends, she gives her own milk to a starving man to save his life. Noah is the slow-witted second son of senior Joads. He finally wanders around. He undergoes the pressures of the journey. Hunger becomes too much for this have-not to bear in the hardships so he dies. Al is the third son of senior Joads. He is in his teens so interested in girls and automobiles. He idolizes his brother, Tom. Ruthie is the pre-teen age daughter of senior Joads. Winfield is the youngest of senior Joads. Uncle John is the brother of the Tom Joad, Sr. is a …show more content…
III. The Triumph of Human Spirit in the Novels of John Steinbeck
Steinbeck is committed to nothing except the triumph of humanity. His have-nots broadly have a rebellion spirit against selfishness and greed. "Steinbeck had an oceanic sense of involvement with all humanity. Every pursuit of the have-nots, no matter what its stated end, had as its foundation purpose, survival, growth and renewal. Steinbeck would mourn the changes in his native turf, but he was realistic about the need for evolutionary growth" (Steinbeck, John. “Monterey Peninsula Herald” 1957: 8).
A bunch of perfectly comfortable, selfish individuals cannot have an idea what actually it is to be a have-not, till Steinbeck beautifully interprets them. He repeatedly asserts that his have-not protagonists do have the stuff the heroes are made up of but they are perfect in their imperfectness. "A writer who does not passionately believe in the perfectibility of man has no dedication or any membership in literature" (Steinbeck, John “The Paris Review”.www.theparisreview.or/.the-art-of-sfiction-no45continuedjohnstein.Web13.Mar .2014).
Senator Robert M. nominated Steinbeck’s work for historical vindication. Carey McWilliams and La Follett inquire into California’s tyrannical farm labour conditions through Steinbeck’s works and give amazing conclusion that he amalgamates the social reality with celebration of human life even in dearth of the have-nots.
"John
In describing the land, Steinbeck is showing humanity is continuously immersed in a struggle of good versus evil; he suggests “the way in which this sense of opposed absolutes rises from deep within man, representing something profound and inevitable in human consciousness” (Owens).
John Steinbeck is the renowned author of novels such as Of Mice and Men, East of Eden, and The Pearl. In his novel The Grapes of Wrath Steinbeck expounds on the theme of the cruelty people inflict on one another as well as how they can overcome the inhumanity of others. Steinbeck’s artfully demonstrates that this cruelty is often born out of the human tendency to think of oneself first; others, if they are thought of at all, come second.
The sermon-like feel of the chapter is effective because it motivates the audience, willing the workers to come together and unite against the elite. The words that Steinbeck chooses to use in this chapter not only resemble biblical language, they also show a clear contrast with how the land is being used. The biblical language can be recognized when Steinbeck beautifully depicts California before the greed manifested. He describes what can be perceived as paradise, an allusion of sorts to the Garden of Eden. This language and allusion brings the audience a sense of serenity and peacefulness that soothes the reader. This sensation is ripped away from the reader when he begins to describe the rot and the decay caused by the miserliness of the elite. By depicting the good found in the land with quasi-biblical language, the greed of the privileged becomes much more malicious and cruel. This contrast helps the audience grasp Steinbeck’s message of how the greed is causing so much turmoil in a state that was once plentiful and luscious. Steinbeck also relies on symbolism to portray his message.
Steinbeck utilizes the novel as a form of social protest by enunciating the brutal and inhumane way the wealthier class treat the migrant workers. For instance, in order to not loose any profit from the fields, the affluent bankers decide to forcefully drive the families off the fields using tractors to “bite into the house corner, crumble the wall, wrench the little houses from its foundation”(39). However, the working class does not have the opportunity to refuse this decision because of the desperate
Seventy-five years later, John Steinbeck’s novel, The Grapes of Wrath, and the film adaptation, are still relevant to life now, because there are several relatable themes running through the book and movie. The novel depicts the about the economic inequality of the 1840s and 1930s. Yet still today, there is economic inequality. The wealthier people with jobs also look down on the poorer, unemployed people. Perhaps there is a fear that the jobless will come in and steal jobs. However, the American dream is clearly present in the novel and has been throughout history.
John Steinbeck’s novel, The Grapes of Wrath, takes place during the Great Depression, a time when troubled and distressed American men and women lived; a time of poverty and an economic crisis. When change is thought upon, it is to be thought of new life and new experiences. The Great Depression is the kind of change that replaces a part of American living with “ Somepin’s happening. I went up an’ I looked, an’ the houses is all empty, an’ the lan’ is empty, an’ this whole country is empty” ( Steinbeck 94). In his work, Steinbeck presents the hardships that Americans had to go through by being mindful of particular aspects which makes the reader understand the characters’ distress. For example, the landscape of the farm lands. Even though the land has its brutality, it grows to be the scenery for humans to be able to recognize and consider their troubles about work and life in general. With these concerns, there are differences between the people who are accustomed to the landscape and admire it, and those who do not agree with it. In the novel, Steinbeck uses attributes of class conflict and injustice as a way of presenting and socially commenting that the Great Depression brought attention to more problems beyond the idea of poverty.
The 1930's were a decade of great change politically, economically, and socially. The Great Depression and the Dust Bowl wore raw the nerves of the people, and our true strength was shown. From it arose John Steinbeck, a storyteller of the Okies and their hardships. His books, especially The Grapes of Wrath, are reflections of what really went on in the 1930's. John Steinbeck did not write about what he had previously read, he instead wrote what he experienced through his travels with the migrant workers. "His method was not to present himself notebook in hand and interview people. Instead he worked and traveled with the migrants as one of them, living as they did and arousing no suspicion from employers militantly alert against
Empathy is vital to trust- but what if that understanding is absent, or if sympathy is not given as needed? Such is the case of The Grapes of Wrath, where class differences rule over a turbulent and aggressive rivalry. The novel follows the struggling lower class, oppressed by the corrupt upper class, who cannot understand their hardships. This lack of understanding and willingness to sympathize with the lower class boosts tensions and further emphasizes differences between the classes, leading to the primary conflicts of the story. Through the use of juxtaposition and point of view in his novel, The Grapes of Wrath, John Steinbeck shows that the upper class lacks the empathy to relate to the struggles of the lower class.
Through his use of imagery, Steinbeck not only creates a brilliant setting, but also ties man’s inherent good into an otherwise dark portrait of the human condition, reminding me of the good within us all.
The unconventionally written intercalary chapters of Steinbeck's novel, “The Grapes of Wrath”, are designed to show the readers a view of economic depression and social aspects of America during this time period. Steinbeck tells the reader about the situation through a macroscopic point of view, when he writes the intercalary chapters. It is through these intercalary chapters that Steinbeck tells us about the struggle of many migrant farmers who are pushed out of their homes and start to live their lives on the road, while trying to find places for them to work. Between each of these intercalary chapters are narrative chapters where Steinbeck gives the readers a microscopic view of the situation, by giving us an example of one of the migrant
In the novel The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, Steinbeck portrays the lives of migrant workers as a difficult life. The migrant workers Steinbeck’s novel are described as facing constant struggle, fear, and discrimination. Steinbeck’s portrayal of migrant workers in the 1930s can be compared to the lives of of migrant workers today. Migrant workers today also face fear, discrimination and a constant struggle to survive. Although certain aspects of migrant workers has changed since the 1930s, Steinbeck’s portrayal of the lives of migrant workers in The Grapes of Wrath is consistent with the lives of migrant workers today.
A few years later, Steinbeck returned to California to write “Grapes of Wrath” and to further research the flawed California labor. “He was not, however, merely researching materials for his next book, but passionately involved in the suffering and injustice” (Lisca 16). His fervor for the migrant cause almost lead him to abandon his recent writing and revise “Of Mice and Men” and sell it so he could donate to money to the migrant workers.
a very handy pacifier for him such as: When he thought he might go to
John Steinbeck wrote about what surrounded him. At the time he was writing, the nineteen-thirties, a great depression was plaguing the United States. Many people were out of work. Many farmers were losing their farms and homes. An extreme drought had also wrecked the farms of the Midwest and made them into what is now referred to as the "dust bowl". It was a terrible time to be poor, and most were. People died of malnutrition every day. In California, where Steinbeck resided, migrant workers dominated the workforce. Thousands traveled from all around to pick fruit in the farms of the Salinas Valley for minuscule wages. Thousands more could not find suitable
John Steinbeck reveals his ideas about poverty through the setting of the novel. It is clear that the author had to set this novel during the Depression of the 1930’s, in a real agricultural valley--the Salinas Valley-- on a ranch with itinerant workers who have very little chance of achieving any financial success. They live in a sparsely furnished, poorly lit, bunkhouse with no real privacy. While this living situation may relieve some of the loneliness of this life for some of the workers, it also ensures that most of these men who are poor and move from one farm to another, have little opportunity to save up any money to have a place of their own and achieve their American Dream. They are driven by the need for immediate gratification--visiting