Christopher Columbus and John Smith are both similar in the fact that they made their kin very proud and became famous of their accounts of unexplored territory. Though their ideas of what to do with what they encountered was different, they both were very brave men. They were different in a way though. Columbus believed that there was a great value in terms of wealth to the natural resources he saw on the islands and he used a different rhetoric to explain it. John Smith saw economic growth possibilities in the fertile New England area that had a vast amount of natural resources, he also valued different commodities than Columbus.
Christopher Columbus’s description of the natural resources that he finds was actually quite similar to John Smith’s. Columbus’s idea was different from Smith’s though, he thought that these natural resources were much more valuable in terms of wealth. When Columbus saw the beautiful stretches of land that America had to offer he was excited of the riches that it will bring him and his mother country Spain. Columbus believed that there was gold to be found in America and that America stretched bigger than England. John Smith encountered natural resources like crops and fish in New England, “For hunting also: the woods, lakes and rivers afford not only chase sufficient, for any that delights in that kind of toil, or pleasure;…pay.”(Smith 125). The animals that John Smith run into are hawks, fish and unknown wild animals that can be heard in the
When Christopher Columbus sailed to America he was happy and proud of himself because he was the first to discover the land which is now named america, and he was also happy because he found out that there were a lot of resources found on that land which he found was necessary to take and use. According to the document A “Day after day they looked for land;They dreamed of trees and rocks and sand” this shows that the purposely are trying to find land for them to dock and discover. Additionally according to the document A “Columbus sailed on to find some gold To bring back home, as he'd been told.He made the trip again and again,Trading gold to bring to Spain” this shows that he was there not just to discover land but to make riches too and
Document B is about letter from Columbus to King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella.It was written in March 15,1493. It is about Columbus he sent sail from Spain to find an all-water route to Asia. This source was created in March 15,1493. During the time this source was created In beautiful mountains, great farms, groves and fields. This source reflects the time period because of Christopher Columbus is that on August 3, 1492, Columbus set sail from Spain to find an all-water route to Asia. Document C is about Account by Bartolome de las casas to the Spanish Monarchy. It was written in 1542. It is about Columbus was a killer and a lier. This source was created in 1542. During the time this source was created Killing, terrorizing and destroying the
Captain Cook and Columbus were similar in some ways in when they encountered the Natives of the lands they discovered but in other ways were very different. Christopher Columbus was more focused on understanding and getting to know the natives as a whole so they could help the people of Europe or be more people put under the faith of Christianity. James Cook was more into business with the Natives that he discovered not trying to get personal but rather trade with them and gain more items that they have never seen or had before to take back with them to
When Christopher Columbus sailed to the Americas he discovered the Bahamas. According to Document A in the poem it says “But "India" the land was not; It was the Bahamas, and it was hot. This means that when Christopher Columbus was trying to get to India, he accidentally discovered the Bahamas. This shows that he did discovered the Bahamas. Additionally, according to Document B, in the letter he(Christopher Columbus) says that “When Columbus arrived back in Spain on March 15, 1493.
“When Christopher Columbus sailed to the Americas he was excited because he found gold, land and people. He thought they could be slaves .“According to Document B, it explains how Christopher Columbus found the land with gold, metals and people. He wants to make them his slaves .“This shows that…” “Besides, this Hispana abounds in various kinds of species, gold and metals“Additionally, according to Document C, it is explaining how the spanish people from spain mistreated the navites and turned them into slaves and how they died “This shows that…” Once these were home to more than half a million souls, but they are now deserted, inhabited by not a single person.
Christopher Columbus and Charles Lindbergh both went across the Atlantic, so that is a start for similarities. More similarities between their journeys included the facts that both men were looked at differently after achieving their goals. People respected them and felt hope instead of being weary of what the world held. Charles Lindbergh and Christopher Columbus both faced many challenges when crossing that great expanse of water, but they both succeeded.
When Columbus landed in the Bahamas in 1492, he thought he reached Asia. He has made himself believe that he has found the New World and that he was the first to inhabit the land. This was not the case as an Indian Tribe, the Arawaks, was swimming to their boats with excitement. As Columbus’s crew arrived on the shores, he was shocked from the Indians hospitality. Columbus was carrying iron swords as the tribes brought gifts, food and water.
The different lives and experiences of William Bradford, John Smith, and Olaudah Equiano show how there are many ways to be adapted to a new world. There were many struggles that each of them faced, and each had different motives when writing their experiences. In some way, there are all connected to one another, with some similarities, but there are differences also.
Christopher Columbus and John Smith will always be remembered for their ego in their leadership. For many residence of Virginia, John Smith is considered as a hero. However, recorded documents provide varying evidence on his leadership and life in general. On the other hand, Christopher Columbus is seen as an explorer who encountered the Americans and was able to achieve immorality to satisfy his egos. He took advantage of every opportunity and is considered to be a leader who did not accept no as an answer which enable him to succeed and even come back to influence after a great misfortune. It is however clear that the success of Smith and Columbus as leaders of exploration can be attributed to their egos. Their writings were full of imaginations and fiction and are considered by some historians to be liars about the newly discovered world.
Throughout recorded human history, authors, leaders, and researchers, have documented the past from many different perspectives, and viewpoints. Not every historian has the same stance on a certain issue, therefore, differences in point of view occur in almost every writing. In the textbook The American Pageant, A People’s History of the United States by Larry Schweikart, and Michael Allen, and Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States, the reader can see many different perspectives throughout each reading. The infamous explorer known as Christopher Columbus, has been documented in many different ways. Depending on the reading, Columbus has be called everything from a “[...]symbol of the new age of hope”, to an inhuman tyrant who captured Indians and turned them into slaves.
The harsh living conditions of the land did not allow him and his fellow Pilgrims to thrive. Once people began to die, Bradford claimed that “yet the Lord upheld these persons…their recompense is with the Lord. (Bradford 170). He conveyed the message that in times of adversity, no matter what, God would be there in the end. Seeking solace in one’s religion may be beneficial, but in the case of Bradford, religion was all he and his people had left to spare. Therefore, it is evident to acknowledge that his negative sentiments were derived from the dismay of the New World and the fact that Bradford’s quest for religious freedom and prosperity ended in death and hardship. As for Columbus, he depicted the New World as a lush environment with a vast amount of land and people. In the Letter of Columbus to Luis de Sant’ Angel, it is evident when Columbus mentioned, “there are wonderful pine-groves…plains of verdure…honey…birds…is a marvel….I have discovered rhubarb and cinnamon…other things of value.” (Columbus 3-4). Columbus viewed the New World as a threshold for opportunity and economic prosperity, because the new spices would be used for trade. The antithesis between Bradford’s and Columbus’s perspective toward the New World was a direct result of their
The Jamestown landing in 1607 was the first English settlement to be established in North America. In the movie “The New World” Hollywood attempted to tell the story of the Jamestown settlement and the relationship between John Smith and Pocahontas. The movie’s portrayal of their relationship was one of two people falling in love. The historical facts of their relationship, however, paint a completely different picture. Hollywood failed to represent the truth and romanticized their relationship which was not one of love, but one of an acquaintance or friendship.
Sailing vast oceans with narrow minds: Columbus and da Gama’s disrespect towards the indigenous people
Christopher Columbus and Cabeza de Vaca were both well experienced explorers of the New World. They both traveled to the New World to find out what was out there and if what they would find, could help them and their country. In the narratives, “Letter of Discovery” by Christopher Columbus and Castaways by Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca, they exemplified the overall environment of the New World. Each explorer had quite the experience within the New World and interactions with the natives but they were not quite the same. Columbus’ journey consisted of learning about the new land and obtain resources to bring back to his country. Cabeza de Vaca also wanted to find resources and goods but mainly wanted to explore the land and try to understand if it was possible to create a society alongside the natives. As they went into the New World, they had found new discoveries but their purpose of the journey lead them down paths that would give off two different perspectives.
Columbus has always been portrayed as an enlightened, peaceful explorer who “discovered” a new world, and became friends with the native people. Howard Zinn’s view on Columbus’s encounter with the natives is an entirely different perspective. Zinn describes Columbus as a man who is willing to torture and kill others to be able to accomplish what he wants; in this case he wanted to obtain gold and other resources to take back with him to Spain.