preview

Compare And Contrast Disabled And The Necklace

Good Essays

‘Disabled’ and ‘The Necklace’ are two differing texts, dating from different times, and which both depict loss faced by the main characters. ‘The Necklace’, written by famous French writer Guy de Maupassant, tells the story of Mrs Loisel, a middle class woman living around late twentieth century France. She faces tragedy after losing a necklace she thought was inestimable, as she spends the rest of her life repaying it and sacrificing her riches, only to find out the necklace was an imitation. This philosophical story is based on morals and nevertheless warns us not to take granted what we already have. The other text, ‘Disabled’, is a poem written by the famous poet Wilfred Owen. It is set during World War One and is presented through the …show more content…

In ‘The Necklace’, it is rather her close past, which is lost; all that took place before the reception she attended, before she borrowed the necklace. The evolution of Mrs Loisel’s life can be seen, as she transits to a lower class in society. She lives in unpleasant conditions and tough standards, as described in the text by ‘the grindingly horrible life of the very poor’. The passage conveys life deteriorating in a sluggish sensation, emphasized by the long words the writer uses, as life gets worse as the days go by. The use of grindingly could be perceived as a way in which the writer brought by this new life style. The adjective is also an image of her life been grinded and turned to powder in a painful sensation; furthermore it is as if her dreams of luxury were been crushed every single day. Mrs Loisel envies better but is not able to obtain this life she thinks she deserves, a life where she can satisfy all her needs, a life where all look at her in admiration or jealousy from how elegant and rich she is and appears. It may seem that this loss of a past life is a moral telling us to be happy with what we have, as we can lose it at anytime, for any reason and by any …show more content…

Wilfred Owen shows us this distance by using the past tense, making the memories stay in the past for the soldier, and creating a certain link to regret and deception. Furthermore, deception is also evoked when referring to the female gender, who is interestingly not only referred as girls but also implied as women and mother who are generally caring and loving but are instead rejecting and deprive him from his pleasures. Deception comes as the women who have become frauds, compared to the young beautiful women of his youth, deceive him. Evidence to this is when Wilfred Owen writes in the second stanza about the women, as things turn from fun to horrid when the women ‘touch him like some queer disease’. The fact that the women do not see him as a person but as a disease that they must cure, a ‘queer’ disease, meaning strange and bizarre, suggests the disgust they feel as they touch him, but also the unloving manner in which he senses they treat him, as if he was a thing, and object of horror. The writer demonstrates to the reader how uncaring females have become onwards the soldier, showing a complete change in behaviour from them because he has lost his legs. Reasons for this may be gender roles at that time which expected men to be strong a protection for women; in the soldier’s case, this could be

Get Access