preview

Comparing Addison's 'Goofus And Gallant'

Decent Essays

The great Michael once uttered a good marriage would be between a blind wife and a deaf husband. This is obviously not the case, however, there is always a question being raised on what is an ideal marriage. There is a small portion in source B states "She pities all the valuable part of her own sex, and calls every woman of a prudent, modest, retired life, a poor-spirited, unpolished creature." So this in turns says Joseph Addison in his comparison of Aurelia and Eulalia, Addison's own "Goofus and Gallant" of wifeliness. Essentially, where Julia enjoys nothing so much as the Opera and being seen in society and city living, Aurelia only visits the city to remember how much she hates it and prefers to find her happiness at home with her family. Addison has his own opinions about which one is preferable, and they are just as certainly nonsense. An "ideal" marriage is neither so specific as to demand country living over city life nor so possessive that it would claim that a woman who wants to see the outside world lacks love for her family.
Of course one doesn't need to be modern in order to recognize that Addison was clearly working through some personal issues with his essay at the moment. One can tell he …show more content…

Dickens does not accuse anyone of crying over missing an Opera premier more than over the death of a child, as Addison does (Source B), but rather seems to be joking about the ultimately petty mannerisms by which "good couples" were judged in public (Source D). Dickens advises us to not judge a book by it's cover but certainly doesn't go so far as to treat being seen in society as being neglectful of more sacred duties. Dickens' view is a lot easier to swallow with how we understand an ideal marriage today: being affectionate and good to one another in public is all well and good, but what others don't see is just as important, if not more

Get Access