preview

Comparing John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

Decent Essays

Of Mice and Men, a book written by John Steinbeck, is a story about two men that are migrant workers during the Great Depression going to the Salinas Valley in California looking for work. One of the two men was named George he was a shorter man and he was the smart one of the group. The other of the two men was Lennie. Lennie is a child-minded adult that was big in size and very strong and because if his child’s mind he wasn’t able to know his strength. This book has a movie adaptation released in 1992 and was directed by Gary Sinise. He also acted in the movie as George, and his co-star was John Malkovich played Lennie. Both the book and movie share similarities, but like all things there are some differences. Something’s were added into …show more content…

Although this is an important change I can see why it was left out because it would’ve confused the audience. But, there should’ve been another way to explain Lennie’s realization. That scene being as changing as it was there is another scene that really changes the ending result of the story. The movie and story both end with George shooting and killing Lennie so he wouldn’t be punished. But the difference between the two is that in the movie George doesn’t hesitate shooting Lennie. In the movie George ended Lennie’s life without having the look of pain and emotion in his eyes. As if he didn’t care for Lennie at all, or he just knew he needed to kill him so he could continue on his way without having Lennie around getting him in trouble and caught up in his messes. This changed the ending for me because if George doesn’t hesitate to kill Lennie, it makes it seem like their whole dynamic and relationship as characters changed. George, in the movie, gives the impression that he would’ve only kept Lennie around only for selfish gain and so he could defend him on his journey to find work and money. That would benefit him in the long run.

Get Access