Not all interactions will challenge attitudes and beliefs. Those interactions that have the potential to challenge an individual’s attitudes and beliefs depend upon the level of commitment the individual has to their beliefs; how committed the individual is to the relationships within the relevant social contexts and, of course, the ability to share a common understanding of the language used within that social context. These elements can be seen in the semi-autobiographical ‘teen flick’, Black Balloon, by Elissa Down, and the 1958 short story ‘Flowers for Algernon’ by Daniel Keyes. Both texts reveal the dangers of fixed perspectives that discriminate against individuals who are different and the importance of fostering equity in all interactions. …show more content…
Alternatively, in ‘Flowers for Algernon’, individual characters or whole groups are confronted by the enhanced intelligence of Charlie Gordon. What becomes obvious here is that interactions may challenge an individual but this doesn’t necessarily lead to a permanent change in their attitudes. The emerging difference between Charlie and his workmates, Joe Carp and Frank Reilly, resulted in evasive statements to avoid social interaction from them later in the narrative, in stark contrast to earlier interactions where they actively initiated contact with him to make a spectacle of his weak intelligence. Charlie’s analysis of the later interaction shows his emerging social awareness, ‘I guess it will take a little time for them to get used to the changes in me. Everybody seems frightened of me.’ What Keyes exposes, through the character of Charlie, is the fixed perspectives social groups can have about those with limited intelligence and how threatened they can feel when those who are disempowered become empowered. Keyes reminds the audience of the importance of treating everyone with respect regardless
The protagonist of Daniel Keyes’ Science Fiction short story, “Flowers for Algernon” Charlie Gordon should not have gotten the experiment. Charlie would have lost everyone he held dear, such as Miss Kinnian because he held a strong bond with her.As well as people he holds dear, his IQ dropped well below what it was before hand. Charlie had made a
As Charlie's intelligence increases he thinks that he will be more liked the higher his intelligence climbs, but later Charlie discovers that whether you are of lower intelligence then most of the population or of higher intelligence you still will not quite fit in. "I've discovered that no one really cares for Charlie Gordon whether he is a moron or a genius. (Keyes 172) Charlie's relationship with Alice also shows how whether he is of extreme low extreme high intellect he still cannot communicate with her the way he needs to. " I'm just as far away from Alice with an I.Q of 185 then when I had an IQ of 70" (Keyes 88). In today's society if a persons thoughts slightly differ from those of the majority of the population then they will be scrutinized and shunned from the others. People are not willing to look at an idea through a different perspective and this is shown in Flowers For Algernon, when Charlie discovers the fault in Dr. Nemur's experiment and confronts him about it, Dr. Nemur treats him like the old Charlie who is to mentally challenged to be correct. It is repeated numerous times during the novel that Charlie was "created" by the experiment and was not a "human being" because of his below 100 IQ before the operation. "I'm a human being, a person- with parents and memories and a history- and I was before you ever wheeled me into that operating room." (Keyes 112). Society needs to learn that even those who are different then most of us still are humans and
The author uses communication style as a method of character development, which the author utilized to build Charlie Gordon’s character. Throughout the book, Charlie’s communication changes from when his IQ is merely 68 to when the surgical procedure raises his IQ to 125. Initially, his grammar is full of errors and simple vocabulary but later improved drastically, after the procedure, by use of complex wordings (Allan 31). The communication style is different between the two phases especially through differentiated personalities and speech between two periods. Daniel Keyes also endeavors to capture the character’s history to enable the audience to understand the events that shape Charlie’s personality.
“Eagar, Determined, and Motivated:” these three words describe Charlie Gordon in Daniel Keyes’s story “Flowers for Algernon”. Daniel Keyes writes about a thirty two year old man with a low IQ (Charlie Gordon) who strives to become “normal”. Charlie will do anything to become smarter even letting two doctors preform brain surgery to enhance his learning capability. Charlie evolves throughout the novel and by the end of his journey although his IQ is low he is a more complete person. He learns the true meaning of friendship and demonstrates intellectual growth as a person by overcoming obstacles and understanding various lessons.
In the novel, Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, it is focused around the ironically unforgettable journey of Charlie Gordon. He is a 32 year old man who has an extremely low IQ, that qualified him to be a subject for an experimental surgery to help him raise his IQ, by a lot. Before the surgery, he had very little memories of his childhood, was very forgetful, and his inability to read or write made his want for knowledge even stronger. I picked this character because not only was he the main focus throughout the book, he has changed and has not changed at the same time and I found that rather unusual.Charlie has changed because after the surgery he got what he wanted, to be smart. But by the end of the book he lost his intelligence, along
“Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.” - Harriet Tubman. Charlie Gordon is a very welcoming, playful, and genuine man. He attends Beekman College for Retarded Adults and has a strong motivation to learn and to improve his intelligence. He dreams of being popular, and making friends. Throughout the novel Flowers for Algernon, Charlie Gordon changed in many ways. Prior to his life changing operation, he was not able to grasp that the people at Donner’s Bakery were not his friends, they only spoke to him to make fun of him. Charlie acknowledged their harsh actions, and started retaliating. Charlie is a very open
Charlie was known to have the personality that was always bright and talkative. Charlie had the lowest skill level out of all his “friends” and he didn't understand how real friends should treat one another so he never thought anything of it. Charlie felt good about himself but he wanted to be smart and know what his friends and other people around him knew. He was ready to learn and he wasn’t scared because he pushed fear away; he just wanted to know what it was like to comprehend what was going on in the world. The
In Flowers for Algernon, the main character, Charlie Gordon is a 32 year old who is mentally disabled. He has been living his life thus far with an IQ of sixty-eight. Although Charlie is not smart, he is very happy, but being happy does not always mean being content, and Charlie is a perfect example of this. Charlies teacher, Miss Kinnian, explained to him that there is a chance for him to get smarter, and that is through a secret surgery. He wants to fit in and be smart like everyone else, but the outcome of the surgery may not be as planned. Charlie’s increased intelligence causes him to lose his innocence. When Charlie loses his innocent mindset he gains experience, which also brings him emotional outbursts. The sacrifices Charlie makes
I had betrayed them, and they hated me for it”(Keyes 74). This quote displays how Charlie’s increasing IQ led to an extreme change in behavior, which causes him to lose his friends. In conclusion, due to the technological
In the short story “Flowers for Algernon,” Daniel Keyes leaves the reader saddened, stunned and ultimately forming questions. Keyes also highlights several characters, a particular character is a mentally disabled janitor named Charlie Gordon. He has a sixty-eight IQ, works at a paper factory in New York, and is oblivious to his surroundings. Gordon’s deepest desire is to increase his intelligence by doing an operation that has only been done on a mouse, whose name is Algernon. Soon after the operation is done, Gordon starts becoming a super-genius with more knowledge than most doctors. He understands elaborate mathematical equations and can read and write at an age beyond his years. However, his increased intelligence starts to “ware off,” Gordon starts losing huge chunks of intelligence, he is unmotivated and is overall ashamed. His three stages which include his wanting to be the one for the operation, his super genius self, and his deteriorating self-are important in Charlie Gordon’s character development.
Before his brain operation, Charlie Gordon was made fun of due to his low IQ by his coworkers and other members of his community. Whenever anybody had done something they would regard as ‘stupid’, his so-called friends would say they “pull[ed] a Charlie Gordon” [Keyes 293]. Gordon, in his feeble-minded phase of the novel, was the running gag of his neighbours and coworkers. Whenever a member of the community would ridicule Charlie, “they always laft” [Keyes, 289] but he “do[esn’t] know why they say that” [Keyes 289].
“Before, they had laughed at me, despising me for my ignorance and dullness; now, they hated me for my knowledge and understanding… This intelligence has driven a wedge between me and all the people I knew and loved…” (Keyes 108) . Charlie finds that even after his operation, there are still barriers between him and his coworkers, acquaintances, and family. “...language is sometimes a barrier instead of a pathway. Ironic to find myself on the other side of the intellectual fence.” (Keyes 114). This idea that language is also a barrier is significant because it shapes Charlie’s relationships with Professor Nemur and Dr.Strauss. “... he has succumbed to arrogance and superiority over those who have provided the opportunity for his intellectual development.” (Wroble). This criticism describes the effects of the growth of Charlie’s ego as his IQ grows too. Not only does Charlie face an intellectual barrier, but also faces an emotional
Imagine growing up and being told you will never amount to anything, by your parents, your friends, or people who see you on the street. The book Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes is a story from the point of view of Charlie Gordon a 32 year old man with an extremely low IQ. He is given an opportunity to become smart and takes it in order to fit in. He becomes the first human test subject for a surgery that raises intelligence. He navigates troubles of family, relationships, work and bad news in a journey to find the real Charlie Gordon. Through “progris riports” Charlie documents his life before and after surgery and the charge that happen when he is shown a little kindness.
Daniel Keyes, Author of Flowers for Algernon used a modern tragic hero to raise contemporary issues and ethical concerns about how we view intelligence, value it and treat others who do not have it. Keyes, in his Autobiography Algernon, Charlie and I, emphasised that the idea for his short story came to him years before writing it; he wished to increase the intelligence of many of the intellectually challenged adults surrounding him so that they could live better lives. The amalgamation of his personal experiences with intelligence, his background education in Psychology and cultural contexts led to the creation of Charlie Gordon, the first person narrator and protagonist of the novel, a character that defies the traditional Greek definition
After Charlie’s knowledge begins to improve dramatically his co-workers become scared of him and force Charlie to quit, even with Charlies increased knowledge Keyes has made it clear that Charlie does not yet fully understand emotions and socialising “what did I do to make them hate me so?” this also allows the audience to feel empathy for Charlie. The one co-worker who will talk to Charlie, Franny explains how everyone’s attitudes and beliefs are conflicted on Charlie’s intelligence with the majority believing it is wrong. When asked by Charlie what is wrong with a man acquiring new intelligence responds with a standpoint from her own belief, “It was evil when Eve listened to that snake and ate from the tree of knowledge. It was evil when she saw that she was naked. If not for that none of us would have to grow old and sick, and die.” This metaphor was purposely used by Keyes in order to not only force Charlie to undergo internal confliction of whether or not he should reconsider his choices with the use of a metaphorical question “what in god’s name do they want from me?” but also manipulates the audience’s opinion on their own beliefs on artificial