Comparison Of Emile Durkheim And The Division Of Labor In Society

908 Words4 Pages
In comparing Emile Durkheim’s The Division of Labor in Society and exerts from the The Rules of Sociological Method to Peter Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality, these authors portray a variety of perspectives in analyzing the framework and foundations of society. While these authors analyze how individuals are impacted by different factors of the environment and social interaction, they also take into account the critical aspect of humans as social beings that creates the foundation and builds on the concept of a society. While society is always subjected to change, the ideas that compose a society remain consistent in their ability to adjust accordingly to social, environmental and political changes that occur. There are several functions to the development of a society that occurs over a certain process process socialization that must develop over time. According to Durkheim, one of the factors that contribute to advancing in a specialized society leans heavily on the division of labor that make up a society. Typically with larger and more advanced societies, these types of groups are more likely to become more specialized in their different tasks that each individual provides. As each individual in this sense, is working together for the collective population that allows society to function more fluidly in an efficient manner that manner. He goes on to say that in order for society to function, all specializations within that society should work in
Get Access