Comparison of Wilfred Owen's Poem, 'Dulce Et Decorum Est' and Denise Levertov's 'Life at War'
1175 Words5 Pages
Poetry used as a tool to emphasize the hideous nature of warfare
War is a horrible concept and it is also responsible for inspiring people, considering the intense feelings that they experience as a result of observing it and the suffering that it generates. A series of artists have gotten actively involved in providing the masses with a more complex understanding of warfare and, in contrast to war propaganda artwork, most of these respective individuals focused on condemning the practice by relating to its terrible consequences. Wilfred Owen's poem "Dulce et Decorum Est" successfully appeals to people's emotions and influences them to want to get actively involved in stopping warfare from happening. Denise Levertov's "Life at War" similarly provides an intriguing look concerning war and its disastrous effects. These individuals basically want people to understand that there is nothing glorious about warfare and that it mainly involves suffering, blood, and young lives being lost for absurd purposes.
One of the most notable differences between these two poets is that Owen experienced war from a first person perspective and actually died as a result of his partake in the First World War. Even with the fact that Levertov did not experience warfare directly, she was well-acquainted with suffering resulting from war and thus had little to no problems writing in regard to it.
Owen's poem is certainly disturbing and this is primarily owed to the fact that the story that he