preview

Condemnatory Diction In The Rattler

Decent Essays

“What if” is something one asks oneself after a tough decision. They ask each other what would have happened if they had chosen another path; would they have felt better or worse. In the short story “The Rattler”, a man questions whether or not to kill a rattlesnake who had no intention of attacking him. He thinks hard about the situation. At the end he decides to kill him and is left with the thought of “what if”. Throughout the story the author presents a conflicted man, an ethical snake, and a tranquil setting to cause the reader to feel empathy along with anger towards the man and sympathy towards the snake.

The author uses arrogant tone, condemnatory diction, and the man’s point of view to cause the reader to feel betrayed and disappointed …show more content…

The man needs to be “the man” to protect all of his family and his ranch. At first glance, he seems valiant and great, but underneath, the reader feels slightly let down by his attitude towards his position. He is self-interested in his position and feels proud to say he has never killed. He makes it seem like the snake came into his territory. This causes the reader to feel disappointed and angry towards the man, causing the reader to view him as arrogant. His status goes down within the story. The writer also uses condemnatory diction to cause the audience feel let down by him. Even though he “reflected”, the man decided to “take his life” with an “unprovoked attack”. The man thought deeply about whether or not to kill the snake. He finally decided that the best route of action was to kill him. He took the first step towards attacking him, a pre-emptive strike. The reader sees his actions as uncalled for, it causes disappointment and anger towards the man. It compels the reader to view him as an insensible person and a slight hatred is formed towards him. The reader also feels resentment towards him, for attacking an innocent creature with no intentions to attack him. Humans are …show more content…

The author portrays the snake as calm and intuitive with an approving tone to get the acceptance of the reader. When the man finds the snake, it was waiting to see the man’s “intentions” in “calm watchfulness” . It did not even start “rattling yet”. The snake wanted to see what the man would do. It did not want to attack first without knowing whether the man was going to. Hurting the man was something he was opposed to. The snake was calm and careful, making him honorable. The audience is pleased with the snake’s noble decision. It makes the snake seem like the victim because he wanted to make certain he was in danger. This causes the reputation of the snake within the reader to go up. Portrayed as righteous by a sympathetic diction, the reader feels pity and pleased by the snake. When the man comes back with a hoe, the snake had “not moved”, but rather stayed still like a “live wire” when he “saw the hoe”. He did not move because he knows people do not want to mess with him and he does not want to trigger a fight. He is dangerous only if someone were to provoke or try to harm him. He will not attack unless he is forced to. This makes the snake seem virtuous. The reader feels very proud of the snake for being honorable, instead of the man, thus making the snake have a better moral conduct. This gives the reader more sympathy, towards the

Get Access