“What if” is something one asks oneself after a tough decision. They ask each other what would have happened if they had chosen another path; would they have felt better or worse. In the short story “The Rattler”, a man questions whether or not to kill a rattlesnake who had no intention of attacking him. He thinks hard about the situation. At the end he decides to kill him and is left with the thought of “what if”. Throughout the story the author presents a conflicted man, an ethical snake, and a tranquil setting to cause the reader to feel empathy along with anger towards the man and sympathy towards the snake.
The author uses arrogant tone, condemnatory diction, and the man’s point of view to cause the reader to feel betrayed and disappointed
…show more content…
The man needs to be “the man” to protect all of his family and his ranch. At first glance, he seems valiant and great, but underneath, the reader feels slightly let down by his attitude towards his position. He is self-interested in his position and feels proud to say he has never killed. He makes it seem like the snake came into his territory. This causes the reader to feel disappointed and angry towards the man, causing the reader to view him as arrogant. His status goes down within the story. The writer also uses condemnatory diction to cause the audience feel let down by him. Even though he “reflected”, the man decided to “take his life” with an “unprovoked attack”. The man thought deeply about whether or not to kill the snake. He finally decided that the best route of action was to kill him. He took the first step towards attacking him, a pre-emptive strike. The reader sees his actions as uncalled for, it causes disappointment and anger towards the man. It compels the reader to view him as an insensible person and a slight hatred is formed towards him. The reader also feels resentment towards him, for attacking an innocent creature with no intentions to attack him. Humans are …show more content…
The author portrays the snake as calm and intuitive with an approving tone to get the acceptance of the reader. When the man finds the snake, it was waiting to see the man’s “intentions” in “calm watchfulness” . It did not even start “rattling yet”. The snake wanted to see what the man would do. It did not want to attack first without knowing whether the man was going to. Hurting the man was something he was opposed to. The snake was calm and careful, making him honorable. The audience is pleased with the snake’s noble decision. It makes the snake seem like the victim because he wanted to make certain he was in danger. This causes the reputation of the snake within the reader to go up. Portrayed as righteous by a sympathetic diction, the reader feels pity and pleased by the snake. When the man comes back with a hoe, the snake had “not moved”, but rather stayed still like a “live wire” when he “saw the hoe”. He did not move because he knows people do not want to mess with him and he does not want to trigger a fight. He is dangerous only if someone were to provoke or try to harm him. He will not attack unless he is forced to. This makes the snake seem virtuous. The reader feels very proud of the snake for being honorable, instead of the man, thus making the snake have a better moral conduct. This gives the reader more sympathy, towards the
The details about how the man feels and thinks gives the reader a sense that he is a sensible man. The man does not take joy in the task of killing the snake given to him by himself. The man knows that “the sport in taking life is a satisfaction [he] can’t feel.” THe man wants to let the snake go and not kill it. It is a similar feeling to having to give something up despite wanting to keep it. The reader has some experience with a situation like this and can feel how the man wishes to let the snake go. The man feels that the job he has given himself is something that has to be done. He looked at it as “[his] duty, plainly, was to kill the snake.” The feeling of having to have to do something is not enjoyable. It comes with some kind of displeasure in what is going on. A similar feeling could be like having to go to the dentist to get teeth pulled. The situation
“..inserted a medicine into my skin that protected me from snakebite and enabled me to control snakes..” (pg 54). That quote explains how he supposedly can control snakes and protect him from a snakebite. Well, on the same page, there was another quote. “I accidentally stepped on the tail of a snake. I ran as fast as I could for a long time.” (pg 54). If the reader pays attention, then they will realize that the two quotes contradict themself. If he could supposedly control and protect himself from snakes, then why would he run away from it? Well, the theme of the novel is to inform readers about how children are affected by war, and having those two quotes contradicting themself, didn’t effect the theme at all. The author may seem dishonest at times, but the reader also has to ask themself if the “lie” affected the mood or theme at
Beeler uses symbolism, labeling and exaggeration. The snake symbolizes evil because he is trying to eat the man. Labeling is used on the snake, there is a bold and clear white label that says “debt”. The size of the man’s cellphone, his face, and the snake are exaggerated. The snake is much bigger than the man. These elements bring depth to the cartoon and give you more to look at than just a snake eating a man. The use of exaggeration on the snake shows that debt is bigger than you and it can be suffocating.
In the morosely reluctant passage, “The Rattler,” the author depicts a conflict between a man’s consciousness and his duty to kill the snake. With the detailed images of the scene, the reader comes to understand the man’s internal conflict. He must decide whether or not it is necessary to kill an innocent rattlesnake; however, when the obligation to protect others is greater than the life of the snake, the man has no other choice but to kill the snake. Throughout the passage, “The Rattler” brilliantly utilizes diction, detail, syntax and overall organization to convey his message.
“Works of literature often depict acts of betrayal. Friends and even family may betray a protagonist; main character may likewise be guilty of treachery of may betray their own values.”
The snake is harmless, minding its own business and is no threat to Margaret but she goes on to attack it because she had been told by Miss Laing that they are dangerous. This is therefore like the anti-German propaganda fed to the British public during the war. There are also biblical links in the relation to the snake as Adam and Eve were tempted by the devil in the form of a snake in Genes. Now Margaret has been tempted to disobeying Miss Laing.
It is apparent from the first line of the poem that author is in a state of overriding fear travelling through the unknown: likening the road to an “old snake shedding its skin.” A snake is a clear representation of childhood fear and youthful paranoia, due to its intimidating nature. Walcott compares the path to a snake because he fears it just like a snake, to him the path is daunting and potentially deadly at first. The author not only compares the road to a snake but a snake shedding its skin. This paints a grotesque image for readers and illustrates how he views his initial journey with anything but enthusiasm. The author is in the unfamiliar wilderness searching for not only the storyteller’s house but himself. His state of childhood terror is only counterbalanced by his encounter with the storyteller.
development of the plot. It comes down to the point where a self-respected-man like himself
The snake in the story symbolizes evil which portrays domestic violence. Sykes tried getting rid of Delia so he could go and be with Bertha, his mistress. He knew how afraid Delia was of snakes so he decided to bring one home. “Then, moved by both horror and terror, she sprang back toward the door. There lay the snake in the basket!” (Hurston 8). He really wanted the snake to bite Delia so he could get rid of her. Leaving the snake in the basket where he knew was the easiest place for it to bite her. Sykes knew that the snake would bite her. He was pure evil. The snake however did not bite Delia but it bit Sykes. “He crept an inch or two toward
The third stanza describes the snake as “cool and gleaming as a braided whip” (9-10). Describing the snake as a braided whip demonstrates the intricate woven pattern of the snake’s scales and the poet’s appreciation for nature and its’ beauty. The snake is not a useless piece of rubber, but a beautiful and vibrant part of nature. “He is as beautiful and quiet as a bead brother” (10-11). The snake is quiet, makes no sound, and snuggles into
Dante also relates how sins are punishable by the act that was committed. He does this through an allegory by saying things such as, “Their hands were bound behind by coils of serpents...A great snake shot up and bit him where the neck joins with the shoulder.” The snake in this canto depicts a couple things: The guilt that the thieves lived with from either stealing from the wrong person or hurting someone, always running and being bound by fear of being caught and the punishments that come back to get them. The snakes that bind their wrists and feet represent their emotions. While some certainly didn't care about their actions others were tormented by what they had done, be it from stealing from someone that didn't deserve it or being in the position where it was kill or be killed. The sneaky snake that jumps out and grabs the guy can represent the punishment they escaped catching back up with them.
Imagine you are at the alter with a priest who is willing to let a snake bite you. You are timid, scared, and unsure if you will live. You cry out for help from God, but the venom circulates through your body, proving your state of faith. This practice is called snake handling. Told from three different perspectives, Adelaide Lyle, sheriff Clem Barefield.
Another thing that relates to a snake is the way the saw leaped out at
“Piano” and “Snake” in D.H Lawrence’s representations express an inner conflict; the troubles they face are based upon distinct and similar reasons, they want an escape to their present state. “Piano” and “Snake” in D.H Lawrence’s representations express an inner conflict; the troubles they face are for distinct and similar reasons; they want an escape to their present state. The interpretation received when analyzing “Piano” was that the narrator himself was having a troublesome time because he aspired something that was nostalgically unreachable for him, his childhood. What caused this inclination to be unreachable was due to the time passing which resulted in him becoming an adult and conforming to the constitutional systems. Snake’s narrator’s inner distress came from the need to break down the structural voices and principles that educational systems had constructed upon him. Both narrators have heavily built up emotions for the want of liberation from the prisons that confine them to the structures meant for them; their desires although differing in context are similar in topic matter. There are in fact differences in what they long for, but there is no doubt that they do desire something different from what they presently have.
One of the main threats to the Eastern Hog-nosed snake is the lack of public awareness regarding their fascinating behaviour and their habitat requirements. In many places in Ontario, the destruction of suitable habitat is cause for concern. These snakes are completely harmless, but their bizarre defence technique can be confused with a dangerous display. When threatened, hog-nosed snakes will rear their head, flatten their neck to look like a cobra, and hiss loudly. If this display is not effective, the snake will harmlessly strike at the intruder with its mouth closed. The Eastern Hog-nosed snake has developed these techniques that resemble venomous snake activity as a defence mechanism to ward off predators. As a last resort the snake will