preview

Cultural Traditionalists

Decent Essays

Cultural traditionalists, as I call them, all belong to a well-organized larger movement that influences all aspects and levels of the national and local church. Working both inside and outside of political and administrative structures, they profoundly influence liturgical practice throughout the Church. But is not cultural preservation simply an agenda? Don't such agendas represent partisan camps who hang banners over worship that serve only constituencies resembling themselves? The mission constituency of cultural traditionalists is specifically confined to people who, for whatever reason, are willing and able to appropriate the ancient cultural heritage of the Church and express their spirituality in those terms. Their mission constituency …show more content…

A starting point exists and has always existed at the Church's radical center: in Christ. Only one agenda distinctly manifests partisanship for Christ. There exists but one banner hung over worship: a human on a cross. Jesus calls the Church to lay down, not just its burdens, but its banners as well. In Christ, lies the only context in which secular agendas can find a place in the liturgical life of the Church. Which agenda then, favors Christ in Liturgy? Which agenda embodies the fullest Tradition of the Greater Church? Which Tradition does the Church generally accepts as a whole. Consider partisanship for Christ in his death. In all four Gospel accounts of Jesus' burial, Joseph of Aramathea, a disciple in secret because he feared the Jews (John); a member of the Council waiting for the kingdom (Mk & Lk); who had not consented to the decision to crucify Jesus (Luke) boldly asked Pilate to hand over the body of Jesus (Mark). Clearly, Joseph belonged to the religious establishment yet was a follower of Jesus. His decision to ask Pilate for the body of Jesus took great courage considering his position on the Council. Only in John's Gospel did anyone try to help him. Nicodemus was a Pharisee and also a member of the ruling council, but a follower of Jesus by night. Together, they did the right thing, although they had …show more content…

They had the will and courage to face the facts as they were and still do the right thing. Although humiliating at times, ordained ministry also involves claiming a dead body and acknowledging and accepting failure. The reality of full churches and choir stalls, lively Sunday schools, and overflowing basements is dead in today's Church. The unexpected has happened. Christ's followers, gripped by fear, are now scattered, or remain silent. Parishes, at worst, carry on blindly, or at best, look for comfortable compromises and expediency. They ignore cultural diversity in general. The rhetoric of denial continues to pour out of parish bulletins, newsletters, and diocesan and national journals. It is status quo. Breaking this cycle of denial and compromise invokes the mandate of the priesthood. Individual priests must accept and interpret the current state of affairs boldly and dispassionately. A decision of partisanship for Christ requires acting decisively at times of abandonment and undertaking the distasteful and thankless, yet necessary, work that lies

Get Access