preview

David Gilbert Immune To Reality

Better Essays

Reality Is Not Real Immediately after reading Immune to Reality by Daniel Gilbert and Being Zack Morris by Chuck Klosterman, they may at first seem like they have nothing to do with the other. After all, Immune to Reality is written about how the mind “cooks facts” and diverts human attention away from the bad and has it focus on the good, and Being Zack Morris is written about how cliche life really is. Throughout both Gilbert and Klosterman’s pieces a certain type of reality is being constructed. Gilbert’s piece, through many examples of research implies that the reality that people believe to be real, is in turn, not real. Klosterman’s piece alludes to the concept of reality is not real by using real life examples that anybody who has been through high school can relate to. Both Klosterman and Gilbert’s texts are arguably related through the ontological concept of human construct their own version of reality and that reality is not real. Klosterman starts out with a very bold claim saying that “important things are inevitably cliche but nobody wants to admit that” (Klosterman 136). As soon as the …show more content…

However, nobody dies, or even gets hurt. Before the car ride, everyone acknowledges that it is a bad idea to get in the car, but they eventually do and the viewers are all ready for what happens next; “If these kids drink and drive, they will have to have a bad accident–but no one will actually die, because we all deserve a second chance” (Klosterman 143). The audience knew that the cast would live, “every decision they made was generated by whatever the audience would expect them to do; it was almost like the people watching the show wrote the dialogue” (Klosterman 143). Even if in real life they would not have survived, the show allows for this constructed reality to seem authentic to the

Get Access