Decade of Corporate Greed

As a result of lower taxes, it prompted corporation to invest, leading U.S consumers to buy more. As the company grew, due to increased consumer spending, it would indirectly raise government tax revenues. The trend would trickle to benefit even the poorest U.S citizens. Reaganomics principles encouraged many industries to have self-control during the early 80s. This led to greater competition and lower prices for consumers (Boskin 1887).

The economy began to recover in 1983 and was surging in 1984. Unemployment and interest rates dropped, allowing more Americans to buy homes and cars (Moss & Thomas, 2013, p. 236). Inflation dropped to four percent, the lowest since the early 1970s. Americans were earning more money, and oil prices were dropping, making fuel more affordable (Moss & Thomas, 2013, p. 236). “Economic growth generated 18 million new jobs and tripled the price of stocks by 1990” (Moss & Thomas, 2013, p. 236).

Reagan really focused on improving the economy during his presidency, with a plan he called Reaganomics, or supply side economics. The main parts of this plan were cuts on taxes and budgets, and monetary policy. Also, he wanted to reduce government regulation on businesses. He thought that these and increasing defense expenditures would heighten economic efficiency. Reagan managed to cut taxes by twenty five percent in three years. However, the plans did not work out at first, causing a recession that some call “The Great Inflation.” The national debt heightened substantially, and the rate of unemployment reached up to eleven percent. Despite these negative outcomes, the economy experienced a sudden growth and prosperity in 1983, which was

The growing corporations in America dominated most of the economy, creating a large gap between the rich and the poor. During this time period food, lightening, and fuel prices declined significantly, and the cost of living

Conte & Karr (2001) report the economic growth of the 1980’s in the United States sees President Regan cutting taxes and slashing social programs. President Reagan also

There were many critical issues with Reaganomics, which was intended to help expand the economy, but it eventually became the downturn during 1981 through 1982 (Foner 832). For example, the wealthiest American families benefited the most from the economic expansion because they had spent most of their income not on productive investments and charity, but on luxury goods and corporate buyouts (Foner 832). Whereas, the poorest 40 percent of the population’s incomes have declined, especially those with wives who did not work outside of their homes (Foner 832). Foner states that the 1980s was remembered as a decade of misplaced values because buying out companies generated more profits than actually running them or

This, however, created chaos in other public programs for instance, Medicare and Social Security. Reagan was fairly ‘laissez faire’ and delivered on his promise to decrease government-intervention by reducing federal regulations on business and industry, a policy preferably known as deregulation which had begun under Carter’s presidency (Newman and Schmalbach 650). Nevertheless, Reagan opposed labor unions-he once fired thousands of striking air traffics who were against their contracts- and many businesses followed suit by taking strict measures against striking. As a result, labor union membership and striking drastically decreased as the economy grew tough during the Recession of 1982, and foreign competition for American jobs made jobs insecure and negatively affected worker’s wages (Newman and Schmalbach).

One major reason Ronald Reagan was able to defeat Carter in the election of 1980 was because Carter failed to rescue the hostages from the American embassy, prior to the election. He had already run for president in 1968 and in 1976, but didn’t win until 1980 as a Republican nominee because he established himself as the conservative candidate with the support of like-minded organizations such as the American Conservative Union. Reagan had several policies to try to recover the economy, one of them being deregulation, in which he advocated limiting government involvement in business. Following this policy, he deregulated several industries from government control. Another policy was to reduce inflation by controlling the growth of the money

While the rich were getting richer, the poor were getting poorer. As Henry George said in his book “Progress and Poverty”, “The wealthy class is becoming more wealthy; but the poorer class is becoming more dependent. The gulf between the employed and the employer is growing wider; social contrasts are becoming sharper; as liveried carriages appear; so do barefooted children.” The United States was becoming dependent on these “Robber Barons” for jobs because of the influx of immigrants. Employees worked extremely long hours at a ridiculously low rate while owners made millions. The government, meanwhile was enjoying a wonderful Gilded Age.

In statistical terms, over the course of Reagan’s career, “seventeen million new jobs were created… with the unemployment rate falling from 7.6 per cent to 5.5 per cent over the same period” (Hannaford). The American middle class significantly grew during Reagan’s presidency, and by the end of it, “there were 5.9 million more Americans who had salaries exceeding $50,000 (adjusted for inflation) than when Reagan took office—an increase of 60 percent… [Furthermore,] there were 2.5 million more Americans who had salaries exceeding $75,000—an 83 per cent increase” (Hannaford). It is clear that, under Reagan, not only was the quantity of jobs increased, but quality as well, with a higher number of people

Hayek believed the economy should remain untouched and in times of trouble, with enough time, the markets would regain equilibrium. He also surfaced the ideas that increasing taxes led to discouragement of consumer spending. These ideas are viewed as flawed because during times of depression unemployment remains constant and there is so guaranteed time issues will resolve while the economy is trying to rebalance itself. No government regulation results in unfair monopolies of industries or businesses in the free market. This restricts modern liberal principles such as the equality of outcome. No government intervention is an ineffective way to structure the economy. It allows for numerous issues such as cheap labor, overpriced goods, non-equal wages. All issues could be resolved through government action and regulation. Hayek’s ideas can be closely ties with those of the Untied States president in 1981, Ronald Reagan. Reagan upheld a huge economic practice know as “Trickle-Down Economics”. This practice involved an attempt to redistribute wealth among different social classes. The government would cute taxes on wealthier citizens with hopes the wealth would trickle down in the economy through mass spending of the elite. This effect was never successful in practice, by cutting taxes for the rich it left them with a high concentration on wealth. This practice aimed at the wrong target and did not prevent relative poverty; it just increased the economic gap between the rich and poor. Both theory’s are evidently flawed and validate the need for a government to obtain economic responsibilities. Regulations ensure an equal ground for the mixed market, which is a key aspect in a stable economy. Modern liberal principles require government involvement to achieve economic

Reagan implemented policies based on supply-side economics and advocated a classical liberal and laissez-faire philosophy, seeking to stimulate the economy with large, across-the-board tax cuts. Reagan’s outlook on economics was what he and the public called “Reaganomics”. “The blueprint for “Reaganomics,” was a sketched out supply-side approach to the economic, including massive cuts in income taxes, capital gains taxes, and corporate taxes,”(340). His platform advocated reducing tax rates to spur economic growth, controlling the money supply to reduce inflation, deregulation of the economy, and reducing government spending. Reagan's policies proposed that economic growth would occur when marginal tax rates were low enough to spur investment, which would then lead to increased economic growth, higher employment, and wages. Reagan’s beliefs on cutting taxes were supported by ideas of William Sumner who believed that the best equipped to win the struggle for existence was the American businessman, and concluded that taxes and regulations serve as dangers to his survival. Reagan believed strong nations were composed of people who were successful at expanding their empires and these strong nations would survive in the struggle for dominance.

Leading up to the year 1981, America had fallen into a period of “stagflation”, a portmanteau for ‘stagnant economy’ and ‘high inflation’. Characterized by high taxes, high unemployment, high interest rates, and low national spirit, America needed to look to something other than Keynesian economics to pull itself out of this low. During the election of 1980, Ronald Reagan’s campaign focused on a new stream of economic policy. His objective was to turn the economy into “a healthy, vigorous, growing economy [which would provide] equal opportunities for all Americans, with no barriers born of bigotry or discrimination.” Reagan’s policy, later known as ‘Reaganomics’, entailed a four-point plan which cut taxes, reduced government spending,

Within seven years the wealthy had more money, but could also afford to give better pensions and pay raises. He reduced income tax from the top bracket 70% down to 28% spurring growth from the top on down and vice versa. This gave some people who lived in poverty a view that Reagan was indifferent to their struggles. This may have seemed the case but growth did happen, and hopefully those critics found jobs; however, driving to those jobs still pinched the pocket book a bit due to the energy crisis at that time.

Reaganomics refers to economic policies implemented during President Reagan’s administration from 1981-1989. The main ideology of Reaganomics was conservation which promoted that “government is the problem, not solution”. That means, society and market would function better with limited government power and regulations. Accordingly, Social wealth was distributed by unrestricted market, and profits that capitalists earned would trickle down to the bottom of society. In this way, people were in charge of improving their lives instead of relying on the aid of government. In order to recover from the economic crisis occurred between 1981and1982, the major Reaganomics objectives was to reduce government intervention in business and social aids. The policies were specified as marginal tax cut, tightening money supply, reducing social welfare programs and regulations. Generally, Reaganomics that impact citizens the most would be tax cut, reducing welfares and regulations.