Title:
Kidd, C., Palmeri, H., Aslin, R. N., (2013), Rational snacking: Young children’s decision-making on the marshmallow task is moderated by beliefs about environmental reliability. Cognition, 126(1), 109-114. url: http://journals1.scholarsportal.info.ca/details/00100277/ v126i0001/109_rsycdombbaer.xml#cited
Research question or issue: The researchers conducting the experiment were evaluating the ability that children have to make rational decisions when performing delayed gratification tasks. The analysts wanted to observe the effect of the environment’s reliability on the participants’ decision making. The researchers wished to confirm or disprove their predictions that a child’s perception of their environment will affect their decision making. They also wanted to test their prediction that children have not yet developed the ability to suppress there motive for prompt gratification. During the classic marshmallow task children were offered a choice between eating one marshmallow immediately or waiting and receiving a second. The study found that most children are unable to wait very long before deciding to eat the marshmallow they have in front of them.
The results of the classic marshmallow task compelled them to postulate this hypothesis.
Method:
The researchers evaluated 28 participants, male and female, from age three years and six months to five years and ten months. Among them, none had recently attended the laboratory where the experiment was
A total of 59 participants took part in this experiment. They were split into two independent experimental groups, one being the control group, and the other the experimental group. There were 30 participants in the control group, and 29 participants in the experimental group. The male to female ratio was fairly equal with
In order to study human development and perform naturalistic observation I went to the mall. I selected a 9-year-old white girl as the subject for my observation. I observed the subject for 30 minutes. During my observation the subject was not interrupted and was not aware of my study.
Whether research is experimental or developmental, there are no guarantees of perfect study processes or results, since both random and systematic errors are expected. Errors and uncertainties of a study’s outcomes surface almost every time. Faulty, aged or incorrectly calibrated instruments, during an experiment, can lead to important alterations of results. Distracting environments definitely influence the outcome. Finally, the human parameter in the sense of having ability to properly operate instruments and correctly interpret measurements definitely consist another factor of imperfect research (Bell 7-9).
Box 3.2: Why do it this way? is especially relevant, as it considers an important advantage of the experimental method. Chapter 6: No experiments are discussed in this chapter, however, the essay question requires you to discuss the value of experiments. Consider if there are certain aspects of human behaviour and/or performance that cannot be meaningfully investigated using experiments. What are the alternative methods of studying behaviour? Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter 6 are relevant in this respect.
An individual can always learn new aspects of life when they are observing an infant. This observation took place in the home of the participant. The participant is familiar with the house. During the observation the child played with her toys in the living room. The participant was a 12-month-old girl who is cared for by both her mother and father. Other participant included the child's mother and the child's aunt. The mother is a teacher, so during this observation and in the summer, they both stay at home. The participant is the only child in the household. After an afternoon nap and snack, the child sat in her mother's lap on the couch in the living room. While she was with her mother, she stayed close to her mother and made eye contact with everyone in the room. The child then got down and played with her toys in the floor of the living room. She began with the toy closest to her and began pushing the buttons while singing along with the different rhythms. The next toy she found was a child's magazine and she quickly flipped through the pages and found pictures of other infants similar to her. After a quick look around the room, she proceeded to crawl over to the nearest shelf in the living room. She began to pull her self up to a standing position and began pulling items off of the shelf and putting them on the floor. The mother quickly diverted her attention by
The Marshmallow Experiment Does willpower matter? According to an experiment that took place in 1968, children who had more willpower generally ended up being more successful than those that were not able to control themselves. The marshmallow experiment is an experiment that involved four-year-olds where they were given the option to either one marshmallow immediately, or if they waited fifteen minutes they would receive two marshmallows. I believe that willpower plays a major part in being successful.
Most of the kid’s in this experiment struggled to wait the 15 minutes for the second marshmallow but for others, “To extend their limited self-control, the little kids spontaneously invented a variety of mental strategies. ”(Source 1). This worked for about twenty-five percent of four-year olds. After twelve years,
NPR’s broadcast on how western and asian cultures view struggle in the classroom is a
In the experiment group, children were asked to postpone their desire to eat marshmallow for ten minutes, but they were notified how much time left to hold their
This study is performed on 2.5 year olds, and tests their ability to use their knowledge of the
This experience consisted of 20 subjects from Woden plaza varying of age and gender. It also included one student who was going to conduct the experiment.
A repeated measures research design was used in conducting the experiment to allow all participants to be involved in each test. A repeated measures design involves participants taking part in both groups of the study so that each participant is tested on two occasions. This allows for a lower number of participants and minimalizes the extraneous variables by eliminating participant variables. This research design was strongly suited to the experiment as it allowed for the tests to be conducted with the relatively low number of participants involved whilst also preventing participant variables such as the eye sensitivity of a participant.
On February 17, 2016, our Life-Span Development class observed the physical, cognitive, and social development of Asher, a 5.5-month-old male. The observation was conducted at Dordt College in room CL2260 and the infant’s parent consented to participate in the live observation. Asher was quite sick and later saw a doctor, so the findings of this report may not entirely represent Asher’s development.
Throughout this course I have learned many things about research at an introductory level. Research is a critical part of all of our lives in many ways. God blesses each of us with a degree of common sense and we all learn from observing others even as babies, we learned behaviors and skills by observing our parents. Walking through experiences throughout life teach us a lot we need to know as well but sometimes we have to take a better approach when we need to learn about certain things. Many of us know that what works in some situations or with certain individuals doesn’t always work or is the safest option for another situation. Controlled and precisely organized study allows scientists to compare and examine contrasting methods and concepts, also helps them to discover various approaches and be able to learn from individual’s behaviors and experiences. I will act as the case study throughout this paper in order to observe what I have learned about.
Observe the details of the experiment with the 16-month old babies who are shown Cookie Monster and Big Bird. Explain the experiment’s design, including the question posed by the researchers and the conclusions they reach regarding children’s acquisition of