This agreement was written in English, to the extent any translated version of this agreement conflicts with the English version, the English version controls.
Declaration of Rights and Responsibilities
This Declaration of Rights and Responsibilities ("Declaration," "Terms," or "DRR") originates from Flought’s Ideology, and is our terms of service that oversee our relationship with Floughters, as well as Services. By using or accessing the Flought, you agree to this Declaration, as updated from time to time in accordance with Section 11 below. In addition, you will find resources at the end of this document that help you understand how Flought works. As Flought provides a wide range of Services, we may ask you to review and accept supplemental terms that apply to your interaction with any specific service. To the extent those supplemental terms conflict with this DRR, the supplemental terms associated with the service govern with respect to your use of such service to the extent of the conflict.
1. Privacy
Your privacy is very important to us. We designed our Data Policy to formulate significant disclosures about how you can use Flought to share with others and how we collect and can use your content and information. We encourage you to read the Data Policy, and to use it to help you construct informed verdicts.
2. Sharing Your Content, Information and Protecting Other People’s Rights
You own all of the content and information you post on Flought and you can control
The identity of a society is verified through the rights which are given to the citizens. The rights of man have been at many different standards throughout time. Often being very one sided, and at times striving for a median between the two sides. In Edmund Burke's essay Reflections on the Revolution in France Burke states that a king is in one sense a servant but in everyday situations they are above every individual. All persons under him owe him a legal agreement to serve his hopes. This essay will demonstrate why Thomas Paine's essay The Rights of Man is more convincing than Edmund Burke's through examination of a heredity government, the nature of rights and the uselessness of the monarchy.
The Bill of Rights and Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen are based on the same principles of natural rights; therefore each document is similar in protecting the people's natural rights. However, despite their similarities, their differences are apparent due to the social situations in which they were adopted. The Bill of Rights stood to protect the freedoms of each individual by establishing a democratic government. The French Revolution eliminated the hierarchy of class and established equality among men with the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen. Several influences from past philosophers and documents assisted the frame work of the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Rights and Citizen.
Through the years America has been built on freedom. Freedom to choose, freedom of religion, freedom to speak, and freedom for just about any person to complete anything they wish within that of the law. These laws have already been place in spot to keep and protect our freedom.
Your privacy is important to us. This privacy policy is intended to give you confidence in the privacy and security of the personal information we obtain from you.
By 1765, at a Stamp Act Congress, all but four colonies were represented as the “Declaration of Rights and Grievances” was passed. They were determined to let Parliament know that they were equal to British citizens, that there would be no “taxation without representation,” and all efforts to stop tax on colonists would continue (Kennedy, etal 2011.) Although Lord Rockingham, the predecessor of Grenville, sought to repeal of the Stamp Act, this in no way meant Parliament was conceding their control. In fact, while the Stamp Act was repealed, another called the “Declaratory Act of 1766,” gave Parliament the authority to make laws binding the American Colonies, “in all cases whatsoever.” In 1767, George III passed the Townshend Acts to collect tax on glass, lead, paints, paper and, tea. Recognizing that tea was a favorite among the Americans, it ensured greater revenue the British government. Again, the colonists’ rights for representation were ignored and they started to boycott British goods and ultimately, smuggle tea. When the Quartering Act was passed, which specified that colonists were to give room and board to British troops, tension began to rise. For two years, the colonists tolerated British troops on their soil and their dissatisfaction with the British Parliament and King George III became evident through many violent riots, abusiveness of tax collectors and destruction of property. According to Kennedy, etal (2011), Parliament, continually met with
In Canada, we as Canadians live in a country in which our values are protected and respected, and this is all thanks to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As a part of the Canadian Constitution, the Charter sets out those rights and freedoms that Canadians believe are necessary in our country. Since its enactment in 1982, the Charter has improved all Canadian citizen’s ability to participate in society.1 So, today, I am here to convince you that the Charter is a key contributor to Canada as it helped shaped Canada into the nation it is today.
In my opinion I think Canada should include eco-rights in the charter of rights and freedom. There are many reasons supporting this and a few against it. In this write up I will bring up a few examples where this supports my opinion. I will also look at this at different ways so adding different perspectives.
The Bill of Rights is, perhaps, the most important, meaningful, and controversial part of the United States Constitution. The document is one of most influential of its kind in the history of the country. A disagreement between the Federalists and Anti-federalists brought the first ten amendments to the forefront all at once, making the constitution, as a whole, able to be agreed upon. As an American, each of the ten amendments is of varying importance to the individual citizen. Subjective as it is to rank the Bill of Rights from most important to least important, ranking can shed some light on the importance of the document to Americans from then, now and even into the future.
The “Bill of rights” had been proposed as a follow up to Parliament’s original Habeas Corpus bill, which safeguarded personal freedom and liberty. Now just about every colony had a bill of rights, so James Madison suggested that if the United States was to survived as a a country it would need to have a set of rules versus thirtheen and every state would have the same rules.
France’s, The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, played an integral role in the development of democracy and the pursuit of liberty throughout Europe. This document was written and introduced by General Lafayette as a result of the French Revolution. The French Constituent Assembly passed it in August of 1789. Influenced by Thomas Jefferson, the American Declaration of Independence, the American Revolution, and the ideas of the Enlightenment philosophers, the document reiterates the values of the French Revolution. Declaring that the rights of man should be universal and remain valid no matter the time or place. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen was a very purposeful document expressing many of the ideas of the French Revolution and the Declaration of Independence.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises contained herein, intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties agree as follows:
The UDHR and the United States Bill of Rights do not have as many similarities as one might think, but some do exist. One of these similarities of these two documents is the freedom from torture and inhumane treatment. In the UDHR this freedom can be found in article 5 when it is stated protection is provided against, "torture, under any circumstances." This coincides with article 8 of the United States Bill of Rights, which states, "excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." Freedom of religion is also mentioned in both documents. Both Article 18 of the UDHR and Article 1 of the U.S. Bill of rights say that people have the right to exercise
Welcome to WritePoint, the automated review system that recognizes errors most commonly made by university students in academic essays. The system embeds comments into your paper and suggests possible changes in grammar and style. Please evaluate each comment carefully to ensure that the suggested change is appropriate for your paper, but remember that your instructor's preferences for style and format prevail. You will also need to review your own citations and references since WritePoint capability in this area is limited. NOTE: WritePoint comments are computer-generated writing and grammar suggestions inviting the consideration and analysis of the writer; they are not infallible statements of right/wrong, and they should not be used as
Human rights are the basic rights that apply to all individuals universally. They play a primary role in protecting and empowering individuals in a just manner free from discrimination. According to the Australian Human rights commission, “Human rights recognise the inherent value of each person, regardless of background, where we live, what we look like, what we think or what we believe”, (Team, 2016). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is a document that was established on December 10 1948 which outlines all 30 articles that have been recognised as fundamental human rights.
Education is a elemental human right and essential for all other human rights. It is a powerful tool by which socially and economically marginalized children and adults can lift themselves out of poverty. It also consists of the right to freedom of education. Freedom of education is the right given to human beings to have access to the education of their preference without any constrictions. Right to education is a human right recognized by the United Nations. It includes the entire compulsion to eliminate inequity at all levels of the educational system.