Delusional Thinking In A Tell-Tale Heart

One might object here that the narrator lacked the mental capacity to distinguish right from wrong. The claim of mental insanity could be supported by the narrator’s abnormal hearing of the dead old man’s heart thumping. “...but the noise arose over all and continually increased. It grew-louder-louder-louder!” (Poe). It is correct that normal people do not hear dead people’s hearts beating, however, what he likely heard was the sound of his own heart ringing loudly in his ears due to his guilty conscience.

Insanity is a mental illness that causes people to not be able to recognize the difference between what is real and what is fake. They are unable to control their abrupt behavior and they cannot manage their own affairs. Someone who is insane should not be held accountable for actions they have no control over. In the short story “The Tell-Tale Heart” by Edgar Allen Poe the narrator is in fact insane because he is unable to tell the difference between what is right and what is wrong, has no control over this actions, and he cannot differentiate fantasy from reality. He should not be sent to prison but instead receive help.

Referring from the text, the narrator explained, “Ha!—would a madman have been so wise as this?” In the beginning of the narrative, the slaughterer attempted to justify his sanity, which confirms that he can establish his own status. According to “The Tell-Tale Heart Insanity Plea”, no mentally unstable person could not perceive reality. “You should have seen how wisely I proceeded—with what caution— with what foresight—with what dissimulation.” If the murderer was legally insane, he would not have had such a comprehensible memory of the crime, however he did indeed. Considering the belief that evil eyes had such misfortune upon it, the narrator can be considered balanced, for it perhaps caused injuries and nobody would desire for anything like an evil eye in proximity of them. Nonetheless, the murder himself confirmed his guilt with all the precautions he took, therefore, he should be sent to prison instead of receiving medical

Without that initial statement, why would we think him mad? Then he says; "Now this is the point. You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing." How does he know that madmen know nothing? I wrote in my own journal once; "Insanity is not madness. Sanity is madness, if one can distinguish the difference between sanity and insanity, does that not then make you sane?" So then, if the narrator questions our thoughts on his sanity, he must then know the difference or that there is a difference between sanity and insanity, does that not then create some question as to his own sanity? I think from the very beginning he questioned his own sanity to himself thereby creating the question of insanity to the reader! Isn't that insane? (ha ha) But was he insane? Insane is defined in Webster's New Concise Dictionary as: "Not Sane; mentally deranged or unsound. Set apart for demented persons. Not Whole." OK, well we still cannot prove that he was or was not insane. Was he a psychopath? Some would say yes, most definitely. But what is a psychopath? Psychopaths have a character type that enables them to pursue pleasure with indifference to the suffering they cause others. Psychopaths are completely lacking such virtues as benevolence and compassion. In this story, the narrator says; "I loved the old man.

Insanity- the state of being mentally ill. Could insanity be an excuse for an unforgivable crime? In the short story “The Tell Tale Heart” by Edgar Allen Poe, we come face to face with a man reliving his killing of an innocent man and learn the chilling state of mind the narrator has decreased to. It is clear he is mentally ill from the start of the story and it is constant throughout the text. The narrator is not guilty for reasons of insanity because he converses and argues with voices in his head, hears nonexistent sounds, and killed an innocent man because he believed his eye was haunting him. Some may claim that there is no excuse for murder, but this man is obviously mentally challenged, therefore should not be degraded any further

The narrator is constantly trying to prove his sanity, yet we can conclude that he actually, if not consciously, subconsciously understands he is going mad. He is the one that first puts the idea of him being mad in the reader?s mind, and he is the one that continually asks how it could be possible that he is mad, which shows that he himself is not sure. He?s trying to prove his sanity in such a desperate way, that I believe it is obvious he must have some idea of his insanity, otherwise he would just state his sanity, rather than trying to prove it.

Poe proposes that the main character is insane by his declarations of sanity. For example, the narrator says that there is no way that he could be insane because he planned the murders so perfectly. In the story, “The Tell-Tale Heart”, written by Edgar Allen Poe, the main character states “Now this is the point. You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen me. You should have seen how wisely I proceeded--with what caution--with what foresight--with what dissimulation I went to work! I was never kinder to the old man than during the whole week I killed him” (388). This quote shows how the narrator actually thinks that he is sane because of the acts that he partakes in during the week that he was going to kill the old man. Another example of this comes from the article, “Ego-Evil and The Tell-Tale Heart”, written by Magdalen Wing-chi Ki, where it notes “In Poe’s stories, Ego-Evil stands out because his hero’s frame of mind is utterly corrupt at its root: the villain can recognize his deviance through the other;

Some readers may argue that the narrator is sane because he constantly explains that his actions are sane. However, the narrator is actually insane because the actions that he justifies are very abnormal. The narrator explains that he concealed the body by, “ First of all, [dismembering] the corpse. [He] cut off the head and the arms and the legs” (Poe l 133-134). Clearly, the narrator’s actions mentioned above are not normal. No sane person would be proud of how carefully they concealed a dead body. The narrator is just trying to explain his peculiar actions in a normal way, which he hopes will convince the reader he is sane. Although the narrator justifies himself, the actions he carried out are not even something a sane person would do, therefore making him insane.

Imagine a world where the most insane people in literature came to life. “The Tell-Tale Heart” is a story by Edgar Allen Poe where a mad man stalks, and eventually kills, an old man just because of the old man’s eye. “I Felt a Funeral in my Brain” is poem by Emily Dickinson portraying the path the narrator’s brain took to becoming insane. Both pieces show insanity well but one prevails. Edgar Allen Poe shows insanity most effectively by creating suspense in the story.

Certain type of people have delusions. These could be a delusion of grandeur, a delusion of popularity, or a delusion that something might be wrong with them. The reader may even have a few lying beneath the surface; waiting to come out and play. These delusions are usually simple things that hardly affect the way we perceive the world, and they are often written off as overthinking and simply ignored by the person having them. However, some let their delusions take ahold of their very being.

It is believed that the narrator has a mental disorder. It is not normal for his roommate’s eye to have so much control over him. “It becomes clear to the reader that this madman cannot judge reality from fantasy” (associated content). The definition of mental illness according to Houghton Mifflin is: any of various psychiatric conditions, usually characterized by impairment of an individual’s normal cognitive, emotional, or behavioral functioning, and caused by psychological or psychosocial factors. Also called mental disease, mental disorder. Basically it’s a disability in a person that causes then to behave in a not so normal way. I believe that the narrator in the story suffers from schizophrenia. Symptoms of schizophrenia are hallucinations, delusions, talking nonsense and aggressive behavior. The madman shows all these symptoms with his false perception, false beliefs, talk of the eye and violence against the old man. Yes everyone has evil thoughts sometimes but if your mental state is intact, you should be able to control those urges. “Human nature is a balance of light and dark good and evil, most of the time this balance is maintained. In those of us not mentally stable the dark side will always emerge”.

Even during the time when the narrator was in the process of hiding the body, he does not find himself insane. The narrator speaks of how is was so cunning and intelligent enough to not get a spot of blood anywhere, of how he placed the boards of the floor precisely as they were before the murder.

In the first few paragraphs of the story, the narrator makes a point of rejecting the idea that he is mad. It almost seems as if he goes out of his way to reassure readers that he is indeed sane. It was at this point that I first got an inclination that the narrator was unreliable, either because he is insane, or just lying. The average person who

Insanity is defined as “lack of understanding” (Insanity). However, Poe has already established the narrator comprehends the repercussions of his actions. The narrator understands what is right and what is wrong, but he does not care. The narrator feels he is too intelligent, and that he is above the law: “I took my visitors all over the house. I bade them search — search well…In the enthusiasm of my confidence…[I] placed my own seat upon the very spot beneath which reposed the corpse of the victim” (386). Poe, rightly, asserts a person may be insane and still understand the actions of good and evil. The narrator applies cunning and forethought to his crime. He is proud of himself and thinks himself more intelligent than the police officers. In fact, Freeland offers that the narrator’s impulse to confess was not born from guilt, subconscious or otherwise at all, but as an urge to flaunt his superior intelligence. Freeland enforces that the narrator’s understanding and level of intelligence makes him much more dangerous than a sane man, or an insane man who is unable to identify between right and

The answer that Ken Frieden gives to this question is a positive one. He downplays the contrast between the sane narrative and mad narrator: “The discrepancy between sane narrator and madman perhaps shows the error of assuming that linguistic normalcy implies psychological normalcy.” Friedan took it for granted that the narrator is mad because he kills an old man for no reason. He is doubly mad, Friedan said, when he imagines he hears the pounding of the dead man's heart and gives away the crime he had concealed. Yet the narrator tells a coherent tale, as if to demonstrate out of spite that he is sane, refuting the ordinary belief that he must be mad.