The dreaming argument
The dream argument claims that the act of dreaming provides an intuitive evidence that cannot be distinguished from those that our senses give us when we are in the waking state, and for this reason, we cannot give full credit to the senses we use to distinguish reality from illusion. Consequently, any experience from our senses should at least be considered carefully and rigorously tested to determine if it really refers to reality. In this essay, I will argue that Descartes’s Dream Argument proves that we cannot gain knowledge through the senses because senses are often deceiving and cannot be fully trusted. Our senses are our primary way of interacting with the world, they give us a raw information about what is present
…show more content…
After all, it seems kind of meaningless to ask whether we can know anything since it is obvious we do. It is even sillier when you consider that to even ask the question, you must assume you know something. But most adults tend not to ask what knowledge is before they can evaluate whether they have it or not. We just claim to know things and most of us, I presume, are comfortable with that. But in order to claim to know something, a person should be able to meet three conditions; believing the statement to be true, the statement is in fact true and the person is justified in believing the statement to be true.
There are significant ways in which our knowledge is gained. In some cases, sense experience alone can provide knowledge but only on certain grounds. In other cases, the content of our knowledge outstrips the information that sense experience can provide and we need reason in some form to provide an additional information. In the dream argument Descartes states that the act of
…show more content…
Unless he could be absolutely certain of something he would refuse to accept it as a basis for true knowledge. And that is precisely the case; the grass is not green, the color is only an effect of light on our sensory system; the color is relative to our perceptual system. Other species perceive the world differently. The sky is not blue, the blue color is not his, and it is only a second quality, resulting from the presence of water vapor in the atmosphere, which refracts sunlight. When I perceive an object, I believe it is a real object because of my perception; while when I imagine that I alone build an image, the perception could be similar to the imagination. Let us remember that Descartes does not convince us that we live in a world of illusion; skepticism is for him a stage. But the possibility of this illusion questions the reliability of sensitive knowledge as a whole including sensations that relate to closer objects. The dream argument is remarkable because it calls into question the sensible knowledge as a whole, even in the most everyday situations. And one cannot dismiss the argument as madness; because the dream is a normal hallucination. Descartes’s argument may seem extravagant, but can you prove that you do not dream forever? If this is not
In “Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and The Matrix”, Christopher Grau analyzes Rene Descartes argument concerning reality. The argument starts on page 181 in the bottom left hand corner of the page and continues onto page 182, ending at the bottom right corner of the page. In this text, Grau explains Descartes argument that what one may interpret as reality may not be more than a figment of their imagination and then uses it to develop his own argument. Grau explains that you cannot know whether you are in the dream world or the real world, and therefore argues that we cannot be sure that our beliefs about the world are true.
In “Bad Dreams, Evil Demons, and the Experience Machine: Philosophy and the Matrix”, Christopher Grau explains Rene Descartes argument in Meditation. What one may interpret as reality may not be more than a figment of one’s imagination. One argument that Grau points out in Descartes essay is how one knows that what one think is an everyday experience awake is not all a part of a hallucination. He uses the example of dreams to draw a conclusion about is claim based on experiences one would experience with dreaming. He asserts that there are times when one wake up from a dream that seems to be “vivid and realistic” however soon finds that it was not. The experience of reality in the dream was all a part of the mind. If dreams seem to be
Descartes first presents this idea with the statement "How often does my evening slumber persuade me of such ordinary things as these: that I am here, clothed in my dressing gown, seated next to the fireplace -- when in fact I am lying undressed in bed!" (Descartes 490). By using an experience of his own, Descartes shows how dreams can be asymptotic to reality. Descartes implies that he often sits next to his fireplace, clothed in his dressing gown, so his dream that he is doing so is very believable. In conclusion, one cannot distinguish between a dream and reality because the gradient between them is so finitely small at times.
The topic of this essay is Descartes’ First Meditations and I will be discussing in detail the Dreaming argument and the Evil Demon argument.
Descartes’ Dreaming Argument comes from his thinking that there is no way of knowing if you are sleeping or if you are awake. To know something is to have no doubt of a fact, it must be a justified true belief. To be justified it must hold logical reason, you cannot state something is true without evidence. In order for it to be true it is not enough to justify it, but it must be justified with true facts. Finally, you must believe it, in order to know something it must be true in your mind. As a result Descartes doubts his consciousness as he cannot truly know that he is awake. This spurs Descartes to question if any perceived knowledge of reality is really true. Descartes calls his senses into questions as he notes, “it is prudent never to trust completely those who have deceived us even once” and therefore concludes that as a result it is prudent, never to trust his sense. In
The last step in Descartes argument says if he cannot tell whether he is dreaming, then how can he trust any of his senses telling him about the environment? To know anything about the external world on the basis of his sensory experiences, it seems like
Descartes dreaming argument suggests that perhaps our senses cannot be fully trusted because we cannot be certain we are not dreaming, and this means we therefore cannot be certain of anything. His evil demon argument is similar but uses the idea of an evil demon deceiving you instead of your senses. These sceptical arguments mean that we cannot be certain of anything at all for it may be happening whilst we are dreaming, or we are being tricked into thinking it is happening. I do not agree with Descartes because I feel that I can be certain I am not dreaming, and I do not believe that other supernatural creatures; such as an evil demon exists.
Descartes organised his ideas on knowledge and skepticism to establish two main arguments, the dreaming argument and the evil demon argument. The dreaming argument suggests that it is not possible to distinguish between having a waking experience and dreaming an experience. Whereas, the evil demon argument suggests that we are deceived in all areas of our experiences by an evil demon. This essay will investigate the validity of the arguments and to what extent the conclusion of these arguments is true. The soundness and the extent to which the premises are true will also be explored. After evaluating these arguments it will be concluded that the dreaming argument is valid, but is not sound. Whereas, the evil demon argument is both valid and sound.
Many different interpretations of Descartes’ dream argument could derive from his theory. In lecture we interpreted Descartes’ Dream Argument as follows:
One of Rene Descartes’s most famous arguments, from his not only from his first meditation but all of the meditations, is his Dream Argument. Descartes believes that there is no way to be able to distinguish being in awake from being in a state of dreaming. In fact you could actually be in a dream right now. Rene Descartes’s theory that one is unable distinguish being awake from dreaming, as interesting as it is, can be at times a little farfetched, along with a few contradictions to himself, Descartes’s dream argument does not entitle himself to any sort of claim.
This essay will take a look at Descartes Dreaming argument and Evil Demon argument. As well as discussing their weaknesses and strengths to later decide which argument is the best. Despite my belief of subjective truths, the reason for doing this is to establish both arguments on an equal basis and to determine which would be best in an argument.
I mentioned Rene Descartes earlier in my writing and want to unpack his thinking a little more. In “Meditation on the First Philosophy,” Descartes starts to question whether he can really tell the difference between being asleep and being awake. He says the following: “Let us then suppose* that we are dreaming, and that these particular things (that we have our eyes open, are moving our head, stretching out our hands) are not true; and that perhaps we do not even have hands or the rest of a body like what we see. It must nonetheless be admitted that the things we see in sleep are, so to speak, painted
Are we actually living in reality? Or is this all just a dream? The father of modern philosophy, René Descartes, had a view of his own on whether we are dreaming or living reality as he introduced this philosophy with more importance than it had had before. The dream argument is what this essay will be covering as it was originally said by Plato and Socrates, expanded on by Descartes, and how it’s interpreted by philosophers today. René Descartes was a French mathematician-philosopher.
Descartes uses the justification that we have all experienced vivid dreams that made it seem as though we were awake, to explain that everything we experience may in fact just be another dream. In this possibility the only thing we are able to know is that the basis for objects in the dream are based on objects in the real world, as we had to first experience these objects to be able to dream about them. The final possibility is that a malevolent being is controlling everything that we see and think about the surrounding environment. With this final possibility Descartes concludes that nothing is able to be fully known, as any logic used to know that something exists could merely be the malevolent being tricking
There are many philosophers who came with theory and belief. Rene Descartes is one the most known philosophers shows theory in First Meditation involves those things that can be called into doubt. Throughout the “Meditations on First Philosophy”, Descartes present this three main skeptical arguments; Senses sometimes deceive, Dreaming and Evil Demon to bring doubt on what he considers his fundamental beliefs. First Meditation, his main subject is to introduce his method of doubt. He believes that the best way to extend clear and obvious knowledge is to begin by doubting his proof of his senses. One of the most famous Descartes argument is Dreaming argument, indicate no objective way to confirm whether we are awake, or actually dreaming. Dreaming argument is a very important argument that is different from his Senses and Evil Demon argument.