preview

Descent Of Amida And Twenty Analysis

Decent Essays

Two different artists share the same canvas. As trade increases between many countries, the flow of ideas becomes inevitable to limit. Therefore beliefs and values intertwine from the
Europe and Asia continent. If we focus on the central figures of each painting, we are given two examples of the interweaving of ideas in art, specifically in religion; Welcoming Descent of
Amida and Twenty–five Bodhisattvas (ca. 1336) and Diptych with Crucifixion and Madonna and
Child Enthroned (ca. 1315). Each work was created thousands of miles in distance, with separate beliefs, and within the century; however, these two works are parallel in structure. Welcoming
Descent of Amida and Twenty–five Bodhisattvas, a Buddhist handscroll, and Diptych with …show more content…

In contrast, the uses of space in the Buddha work are less as we can see the artist taking advantage of the scroll and limiting the negative space around the Buddha.
As compared to the Virgin Mary and child, Segna di Bonaventura wanted to show depth between
Mary and the angels surrounding them by an equal amount of positive and negative space between them; creating this illusion of a room that encompass the audience and the angels. In the
Buddha work, the artist depicts the figures as bodhisattvas by the item they are wearing
“crowns,” and the ropes they have shredded. This is key because it shows them returning from nirvana, and enlightenment to help others to achieve the identical outcome. Compared to …show more content…

Segna di Bonaventura stresses the ropes by the use of texture we see the angels are holding their garments showing a certain weight they bear. Also, the ropes of the Virgin Mary can be seen tugging at her legs, again, the use of texture within her ropes to show the silk in the cloth in a two-dimensional realm. The similarities and the differences in both of these works are things that could be discussed by many different people for numerous hours. Hopefully the examples put forth are sufficient in proving how these similar works are obviously created by different artists who lived in diverse countries with similar ideologies; to obtain eternal bless for ones’ self. Thus, the artists perceived this bless in their work with the use of iconography, hierarchical scale, and the icons being use; Jesus, halos, mandalas, and mudra. Also, there are differences with both works such as, spacing and the use of texture. We can speculate that the worship of idols in both works can be derived from the romans, in which they idolized their gods with sculptures and figurines.
Therefore, the world however grant, can still be seen as a small place. As both these

Get Access