Did Jim and Laura Buy a Car Essay

Question 4. 4. (TCO 4) Sandy mails a letter back to Andrea that she has signed; the letter makes reference to a car Andrea has for sale and Andrea’s desired price. When Andrea later delivers the car to Sandy, Sandy returns the car, claiming she does not want the car and that they did not have a contract, so she is not bound to keep the car. Andrea, however, claims they do have a contract and wants to enforce said contract for the price of the car. What standard would the court use to determine whether there is a contract between the parties for the sale of the car? (Points : 25)

Identify the facts from the scenario which support your decision on whether or not a contract exists for the purchase of the automobile.

An agreement cannot bind unless both parties to the agreement know what they are doing and freely choose to do it. This implies that the seller who intends to enter a contract with a customer has a duty to disclose exactly what the customer is buying and what the terms of the sale are.

Contracts can be defined through promises between parties that are enforceable through law. We know that both parties agreed verbally, an oral agreement was made to hold the car for one day with a hundred-dollar deposit and Stan agreed to the terms that the deposit was refundable. Contracts can be in in two form which are written or oral. Based on the elements of contracts, many fundamentals factors are considered mandatory to form a contract that is binding on parties and are primarily outlined through the following:

Offer – to form a contract there must be an offer by one party. It is a definite and clear statement of willingness to be bound on stated terms without further consultations. Offer can be in written or oral form but it is not effective if it is not being communicated to the offeree.

In order for a contract to be considered valid four elements must be present, 1) Agreement 2) consideration 3) contractual capacity and 4) legal object (Kubasek, N. 2011 pgs. 304/305).. In Sam’s case of his invention, the first element, Agreement, certainly exists. Sam had made a verbal “offer” to deliver one thousand units to the chain store, and the stores letter to Sam demanding delivery of the product can be considered an acceptance of his offer. The second element of a contract is the consideration or the bargained for exchange under the contract (Kubasek, N. 2011 pg. 343). While one might assume that in this situation each party had agreed to exchange something for others services, there is no evidence

I believe that there were two contracts made in this scenario. The first one was the verbal contract that sated that the stipulations of price and the fact that there needed to be a written contract before distributing the product. The email, since it was in writing can also count as a written contract; both parties had knowledge that there would be some sort of written agreement. Chou was in the right to think that the email stating the key terms and agreements counts as a contract.

Wilbert Heikkila listed eight parcels of property for sale and David McLaughlin was interested in purchasing three of them. Mr. Heikkila proposed a counter offer and then withdrew his offer to sell, was a contract ever reached? To conclude on this issue, we have to look at whether there was ever a “meeting of the minds” regarding this transaction. Mr. McLaughlin made an offer to purchase three of the parcels, however when Mr. Heikkila received the offer, he countered and resubmitted to Mr. McLaughlin. At that point, a counter offer rejects the original and becomes the current offer for consideration. Until the two parties come to an agreement on the terms, there is no contract, stated or implied. Mr. Heikkila also has no obligation to

The offeree is the only party with legal power to accept an offer, thus forming a contract. In addition, for the contract to be considered accepted, the offeree must accept all the terms of the offer unequivocally. This is called “the mirror image rule”. For example, if the offeree stated “I will purchase your home, but I wish the drive way was repaved”. The offeree accepted the terms, making this an accepted contract. An example of non-acceptance is if the offeree stated “I will purchase your home, if you pave the driveway”, This would be a

Most contracts are valid despite the fact that they may be only oral. Dan was knowledgeable that Pat wanted to buy a home, which she was not financially qualified to purchase. Consequently, he offered to purchase the home and sell it to her, when she had the capital to do so. The statement of Don to Pat, “When you come up with the money, I will sell the home to you for $250,000, plus a fair commission to be determined”, and Pat’s search and identification of a suitable home, and Dan’s purchase supports each intent to be bound.

In order to have a valid contract, Marsha should make an offer to buy the car and Jim has to accept it given the fact that all terms of sale has been agreed on.

Contract is defined as an agreement between two or more parties creating obligations that are enforceable or otherwise recognizable at law. For purposes of this chapter, we are concerned with agreements to buy and sell some type of agricultural product. Contracts 101 You should be concerned about contract law because it determines how parties to the contract will need to keep the promises they make. Although very few contracts ever end up in court, if the parties to a contract disagree on something and are unable to resolve the disagreement, they may have to resort to the judicial process. This means that as the parties negotiate a contract, they need to consider how a judge might ultimately interpret it. For a contract to be enforceable, it must involve:

For implied warranties, the Uniform Sales Act imposed obligations on the the seller as a matter of law, and thus did not depend upon any express agreement of the parties. Accordingly, the court held that when a manufacturer puts a new car in the stream of commerce, an implied warranty accompanies the car to the ultimate purchaser.

Have you ever been involved in a real estate transaction in which you were not certain whether the parties had a binding contract? Perhaps the buyer and seller had reached an oral agreement when another buyer made an offer on the property. Maybe one of the parties got "cold feet" and wanted to back out of the deal even after signing the contract.

Given the financial magnitude of this particular negotiation, all parts of this negotiation and interaction with one another required a great deal of listening and efficiently speaking. The car salesman had to, and did, listen to what I was looking for as far as a vehicle to purchase and he was able