preview

Differences Between Chesapeake Colonies And New England Colonies

Decent Essays

Although the Chesapeake Colonies and New England Colonies were settled at around the same time, by 1700 the regions had evolved into two distinct societies. The New England colonies were made up of Connecticut, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Massachusetts Bay, and the Province of New Hampshire. On the flip side, the Chesapeake colonies only consisted of Maryland and Virginia. Both of which were populated by English colonists hoping for better lives. However, they differed in many ways, including : religion, family size , and economic structure. The reasons for this distinct development were mostly based on the type of people from England who chose to settle in the two areas. For example, the people who settled in New England were religious separatists, while people who immigrated to the Chesapeake region had no religious motives.“Forty-Five thousand Puritans left England between 1620 and 1640” (Document, 9). Puritans came to America to practice religious freedom because in England they changed the Roman catholic church into the church of England. Furthermore, John Winthrop and other members of the colonies wanted to have a “city upon hill” (Document, 1). They were trying to obtain a pure colony …show more content…

In the New England colony there were large families with different ages settling. While , in the Chesapeake usually single males would settle. As shown in document 2 and 3, there is a clear distinction between the two. In document 2 , lists all the people bound for New England , they all have different ages, but all consists of families which include children. In document 3, however, lists all names embarking to Virginia and the majority of them are single older men with no children. Because the New England colony had families colonize it , it made their colonies more structured and more friendly. The Chesapeake colonies were more secluded and less

Get Access